ipa/109607 - properly gimplify conversions introduced by IPA param manipulation
Checks
Commit Message
The following addresses IPA param manipulation (through IPA SRA)
replacing
BIT_FIELD_REF <*this_8(D), 8, 56>
with
BIT_FIELD_REF <VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<const struct profile_count>(ISRA.814), 8, 56>
which is supposed to be invalid GIMPLE (ISRA.814 is a register).
There's currently insufficient checking in place to catch this in the
IL verifier but I am working on that as part of fixing PR109594.
The solution for the particular testcase I am running into this is
to split the conversion to a separate stmt. Generally the modification
phase is set up for this but the extra_stmts sequence isn't passed
around everywhere. The following passes it to modify_expression
from modify_assignment when rewriting the RHS.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
PR ipa/109607
* ipa-param-manipulation.h
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression): Add extra_stmts
argument.
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression): Likewise.
When we need a conversion and the replacement is a register
split the conversion out.
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_assignment): Pass
extra_stmts to RHS modify_expression.
* g++.dg/torture/pr109607.C: New testcase.
---
gcc/ipa-param-manipulation.cc | 10 ++++++++--
gcc/ipa-param-manipulation.h | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr109607.C | 13 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr109607.C
@@ -1825,7 +1825,8 @@ ipa_param_body_adjustments::replace_removed_params_ssa_names (tree old_name,
necessary conversions. */
bool
-ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression (tree *expr_p, bool convert)
+ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression (tree *expr_p, bool convert,
+ gimple_seq *extra_stmts)
{
tree expr = *expr_p;
@@ -1860,6 +1861,11 @@ ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression (tree *expr_p, bool convert)
gcc_checking_assert (tree_to_shwi (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
== tree_to_shwi (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (repl))));
tree vce = build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (expr), repl);
+ if (is_gimple_reg (repl))
+ {
+ gcc_assert (extra_stmts);
+ vce = force_gimple_operand (vce, extra_stmts, true, NULL_TREE);
+ }
*expr_p = vce;
}
else
@@ -1887,7 +1893,7 @@ ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_assignment (gimple *stmt,
lhs_p = gimple_assign_lhs_ptr (stmt);
any = modify_expression (lhs_p, false);
- any |= modify_expression (rhs_p, false);
+ any |= modify_expression (rhs_p, false, extra_stmts);
if (any
&& !useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (*lhs_p), TREE_TYPE (*rhs_p)))
{
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ private:
unsigned unit_offset);
ipa_param_body_replacement *lookup_first_base_replacement (tree base);
tree replace_removed_params_ssa_names (tree old_name, gimple *stmt);
- bool modify_expression (tree *expr_p, bool convert);
+ bool modify_expression (tree *expr_p, bool convert, gimple_seq * = nullptr);
bool modify_assignment (gimple *stmt, gimple_seq *extra_stmts);
bool modify_call_stmt (gcall **stmt_p, gimple *orig_stmt);
bool modify_cfun_body ();
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-require-effective-target lp64 }
+
+enum profile_quality { GUESSED_LOCAL };
+struct profile_count {
+ long m_val : 61;
+ profile_quality m_quality : 3;
+ bool verify() {
+ m_quality ? __builtin_abort (), 0 : 0;
+ return m_val == GUESSED_LOCAL;
+ }
+} count;
+void verify_flow_info() { count.verify(); }