tree-optimization/109237 - last_stmt is possibly slow
Checks
Commit Message
Most uses of last_stmt are interested in control transfer stmts
and for the testcase gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges shows up in
the profile. But last_stmt looks past trailing debug stmts but
those would be rejected by GIMPLEs verify_flow_info. The following
adds possible_ctrl_stmt besides last_stmt which does not look
past trailing debug stmts and adjusts gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges.
I've put checking code into possible_ctrl_stmt that it will not
miss a control statement if the real last stmt is a debug stmt.
The alternative would be to change last_stmt, explicitely introducing
last_nondebug_stmt. I remember we chickened out and made last_stmt
conservative here but not anticipating the compile-time issues this
creates. I count 227 last_stmt and 12 last_and_only_stmt uses.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Any opinions? I probably lean towards s/last_stmt/last_nondebug_stmt/
in next stage1 and then adding last_stmt and changing some
uses back - through for maintainance that's going to be a
nightmare (or maybe not, a "wrong" last_stmt should be safe to
backport and a last_nondebug_stmt will fail to build).
Richard.
PR tree-optimization/109237
* tree-cfg.h (possible_ctrl_stmt): New function returning
the last stmt not skipping debug stmts.
(gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges): Use it.
---
gcc/tree-cfg.cc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
gcc/tree-cfg.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -2947,6 +2947,26 @@ first_non_label_stmt (basic_block bb)
return !gsi_end_p (i) ? gsi_stmt (i) : NULL;
}
+/* Return the last statement of a basic block BB that's possibly control
+ altering. Compared to last_stmt this will return a debug stmt if that
+ is the last stmt. */
+
+gimple *
+possible_ctrl_stmt (basic_block bb)
+{
+ gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_last_bb (bb);
+ if (gsi_end_p (i))
+ return NULL;
+ if (flag_checking && is_gimple_debug (gsi_stmt (i)))
+ {
+ /* Verify that if the real last stmt is a debug stmt the
+ last non-debug stmt isn't control altering. */
+ gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
+ gcc_assert (!last || !stmt_ends_bb_p (last));
+ }
+ return gsi_stmt (i);
+}
+
/* Return the last statement in basic block BB. */
gimple *
@@ -8990,7 +9010,7 @@ gimple_purge_dead_eh_edges (basic_block bb)
bool changed = false;
edge e;
edge_iterator ei;
- gimple *stmt = last_stmt (bb);
+ gimple *stmt = possible_ctrl_stmt (bb);
if (stmt && stmt_can_throw_internal (cfun, stmt))
return false;
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ extern bool assert_unreachable_fallthru_edge_p (edge);
extern void delete_tree_cfg_annotations (function *);
extern gphi *get_virtual_phi (basic_block);
extern gimple *first_stmt (basic_block);
+extern gimple *possible_ctrl_stmt (basic_block);
extern gimple *last_stmt (basic_block);
extern gimple *last_and_only_stmt (basic_block);
extern bool verify_gimple_in_seq (gimple_seq, bool = true);