[pushed] c++: fix class-valued ?: extension
Commit Message
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
-- >8 --
When the gimplifier encounters the same TARGET_EXPR twice, it evaluates
TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL the first time and clears it so that the later
evaluation is just the temporary. With this testcase, using the extension
to treat an omitted middle operand as repeating the first operand, that led
to doing a bitwise copy of the S(1) temporary on return rather than properly
calling the copy constructor.
We can't use S(1) to initialize the return value here anyway, because we
need to materialize it into a temporary so we can convert it to bool and
determine which arm we're evaluating. So let's just treat the middle
operand as an xvalue.
PR c++/93046
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.cc (build_conditional_expr): For a?:c extension, treat
a reused class prvalue as an xvalue.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/ext/cond4.C: Add runtime test.
---
gcc/cp/call.cc | 5 +++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/cond4.C | 17 ++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
base-commit: af9034827e8f06f10767064e9fc7443b94e08184
prerequisite-patch-id: b1512f7473cce4cc8f21dbc772d07bd59c632e5e
@@ -5402,6 +5402,11 @@ build_conditional_expr (const op_location_t &loc,
arg1 = cp_stabilize_reference (arg1);
arg2 = arg1 = prevent_lifetime_extension (arg1);
}
+ else if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == TARGET_EXPR)
+ /* arg1 can't be a prvalue result of the conditional
+ expression, since it needs to be materialized for the
+ conversion to bool, so treat it as an xvalue in arg2. */
+ arg2 = move (TARGET_EXPR_SLOT (arg1));
else
arg2 = arg1 = cp_save_expr (arg1);
}
@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
// PR c++/93046
-// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-do run }
// { dg-options "" }
+int c;
+
struct S {
- S (int);
- operator bool ();
+ int i;
+ S (int i) : i(i) { ++c; }
+ S (const S &s): i(s.i) { ++c; }
+ operator bool () { return i; }
};
S
@@ -12,3 +16,10 @@ foo ()
{
return S (1) ? : S (2);
}
+
+int main()
+{
+ S s = foo();
+ if (s.i != 1 || c != 2)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+}