[COMMITTED] Make frange selftests work on !HONOR_NANS systems.
Commit Message
I'm just shuffling the FP self tests here, with no change to existing
functionality.
If we agree that explicit NANs in the source code with !HONOR_NANS
should behave any differently, I'm happy to address whatever needs
fixing, but for now I'd like to unblock the !HONOR_NANS build systems.
I have added an adaptation of a test Jakub suggested we handle in the PR:
void funk(int cond)
{
float x;
if (cond)
x = __builtin_nan ("");
else
x = 1.24;
bar(x);
}
For !HONOR_NANS, the range for the PHI of x_1 is the union of 1.24 and
NAN which is really 1.24 with a maybe NAN. This reflects the IL-- the
presence of the actual NAN. However, VRP will propagate this because
it sees the 1.24 and ignores the possibility of a NAN, per
!HONOR_NANS. IMO, this is correct. OTOH, for HONOR_NANS the unknown
NAN property keeps us from propagating the value.
Is there a reason we don't warn for calls to __builtin_nan when
!HONOR_NANS? That makes no sense to me.
PR tree-optimization/106785
gcc/ChangeLog:
* value-range.cc (range_tests_nan): Adjust tests for !HONOR_NANS.
(range_tests_floats): Same.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp-float-nan-1.c: New test.
---
.../gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp-float-nan-1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++
gcc/value-range.cc | 23 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp-float-nan-1.c
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -ffinite-math-only -fdump-tree-evrp" }
+
+void bar(float);
+
+void funk(int cond)
+{
+ float x;
+
+ if (cond)
+ x = __builtin_nan ("");
+ else
+ x = 1.24;
+
+ bar(x);
+}
+
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "bar \\(1.24" 1 "evrp" } }
@@ -3535,13 +3535,16 @@ range_tests_nan ()
REAL_VALUE_TYPE q, r;
// Equal ranges but with differing NAN bits are not equal.
- r1 = frange_float ("10", "12");
- r0 = r1;
- ASSERT_EQ (r0, r1);
- r0.set_nan (fp_prop::NO);
- ASSERT_NE (r0, r1);
- r0.set_nan (fp_prop::YES);
- ASSERT_NE (r0, r1);
+ if (HONOR_NANS (float_type_node))
+ {
+ r1 = frange_float ("10", "12");
+ r0 = r1;
+ ASSERT_EQ (r0, r1);
+ r0.set_nan (fp_prop::NO);
+ ASSERT_NE (r0, r1);
+ r0.set_nan (fp_prop::YES);
+ ASSERT_NE (r0, r1);
+ }
// NAN ranges are not equal to each other.
r0 = frange_nan (float_type_node);
@@ -3624,9 +3627,11 @@ range_tests_floats ()
if (HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (float_type_node))
range_tests_signed_zeros ();
- // A range of [-INF,+INF] is actually VARYING...
+ // A range of [-INF,+INF] is actually VARYING if no other properties
+ // are set.
r0 = frange_float ("-Inf", "+Inf");
- ASSERT_TRUE (r0.varying_p ());
+ if (r0.get_nan ().varying_p ())
+ ASSERT_TRUE (r0.varying_p ());
// ...unless it has some special property...
r0.set_nan (fp_prop::NO);
ASSERT_FALSE (r0.varying_p ());