diff mbox series

testsuite: Add test for r11-4123

Message ID 20220822165737.39118-1-polacek@redhat.com
State New, archived
Headers
Series testsuite: Add test for r11-4123 |

Commit Message

Marek Polacek Aug. 22, 2022, 4:57 p.m. UTC 
  r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
ICE was:

phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
   28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
PHI argument
_12
for PHI node
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
(downstream)?  Thanks.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C


base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898

Comments

Andrew Pinski Aug. 22, 2022, 5:16 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:58 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
> ICE was:
>
> phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
>    28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> PHI argument
> _12
> for PHI node
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
>
> Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
> (downstream)?  Thanks.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..26cade052e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }

It seems better to put it in g++.dg/torture and remove -O part.
And then it will be tested for more than before.
Maybe even just mark makeArray as always_inline/inline and you might
be able to remove the param also.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

> +
> +struct Element;
> +template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
> +template <int _Nm> struct array {
> +  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
> +};
> +bool logLevel();
> +struct LogCapture {
> +  void stream();
> +};
> +struct Element {
> +  Element();
> +  long data_;
> +};
> +using ElementArray = array<6>;
> +struct ElementManager {
> +  ElementManager();
> +  ElementArray array_;
> +};
> +static ElementArray makeArray() {
> +  if (logLevel())
> +    LogCapture().stream();
> +  ElementArray foo;
> +  return foo;
> +}
> +ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
>
> base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
> --
> 2.37.2
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..26cade052e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ 
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }
+
+struct Element;
+template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
+template <int _Nm> struct array {
+  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
+};
+bool logLevel();
+struct LogCapture {
+  void stream();
+};
+struct Element {
+  Element();
+  long data_;
+};
+using ElementArray = array<6>;
+struct ElementManager {
+  ElementManager();
+  ElementArray array_;
+};
+static ElementArray makeArray() {
+  if (logLevel())
+    LogCapture().stream();
+  ElementArray foo;
+  return foo;
+}
+ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}