[1/2] Fix C/107926: Wrong error message when initializing char array
Checks
Commit Message
From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
The problem here is the code which handles {"a"} is supposed
to handle the case where the is something after the string but
it only handles the case where there is another string so
we go down the other path and error out saying "excess elements
in struct initializer" even though this was a character array.
To fix this, we need to move the ckeck if the initializer is
a string after the check for array and initializer.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Thanks,
Adnrew Pinski
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR c/107926
* c-typeck.cc (process_init_element):
Move the ceck for string cst until
after the error message.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c/107926
* gcc.dg/init-excess-3.c: New test.
---
gcc/c/c-typeck.cc | 15 ++++++++++-----
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/init-excess-3.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/init-excess-3.c
Comments
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:18:14AM -0800, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/107926
> * c-typeck.cc (process_init_element):
> Move the ceck for string cst until
> after the error message.
Just a ChangeLog nit, not a patch review for which I defer to C FE
maintainers/reviewers.
s/ceck/check/, plus don't start the description uselessly on a next line
when half of it would fit on the first line after ):.
* c-typeck.cc (process_init_element): Move the check for string cst
until after the error message.
Jakub
On 11/30/22 10:18, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
> From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
>
> The problem here is the code which handles {"a"} is supposed
> to handle the case where the is something after the string but
> it only handles the case where there is another string so
> we go down the other path and error out saying "excess elements
> in struct initializer" even though this was a character array.
> To fix this, we need to move the ckeck if the initializer is
> a string after the check for array and initializer.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>
> Thanks,
> Adnrew Pinski
>
> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/107926
> * c-typeck.cc (process_init_element):
> Move the ceck for string cst until
> after the error message.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/107926
> * gcc.dg/init-excess-3.c: New test.
OK
jeff
@@ -10623,17 +10623,22 @@ process_init_element (location_t loc, struct c_expr value, bool implicit,
/* Handle superfluous braces around string cst as in
char x[] = {"foo"}; */
- if (string_flag
- && constructor_type
+ if (constructor_type
&& !was_designated
&& TREE_CODE (constructor_type) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (constructor_type))
&& integer_zerop (constructor_unfilled_index))
{
if (constructor_stack->replacement_value.value)
- error_init (loc, "excess elements in %<char%> array initializer");
- constructor_stack->replacement_value = value;
- return;
+ {
+ error_init (loc, "excess elements in %<char%> array initializer");
+ return;
+ }
+ else if (string_flag)
+ {
+ constructor_stack->replacement_value = value;
+ return;
+ }
}
if (constructor_stack->replacement_value.value != NULL_TREE)
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* Test for various cases of excess initializers for char arrays,
+ bug 107926. */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+
+
+char s0[] = {"abc",1}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init" } */
+char s1[] = {"abc","a"}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init" } */
+char s2[] = {1,"abc"}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init|computable at load time" } */
+/* { dg-warning "integer from pointer without a cast" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+
+char s3[5] = {"abc",1}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init" } */
+char s4[5] = {"abc","a"}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init" } */
+char s5[5] = {1,"abc"}; /* { dg-error "array initializer|near init|computable at load time" } */
+/* { dg-warning "integer from pointer without a cast" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */