[1/2] perf: Add sched_task callback during ctx reschedule

Message ID 20230328222735.1367829-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
State New
Headers
Series [1/2] perf: Add sched_task callback during ctx reschedule |

Commit Message

Liang, Kan March 28, 2023, 10:27 p.m. UTC
  From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Several similar kernel warnings can be triggered,

  [56605.607840] CPU0 PEBS record size 0, expected 32, config 0
  cpuc->record_size=208

when the below commands are running in parallel for a while on SPR.

  while true; do perf record --no-buildid -a --intr-regs=AX -e
  cpu/event=0xd0,umask=0x81/pp -c 10003 -o /dev/null ./triad; done &

  while true; do perf record -o /tmp/out -W -d -e
  '{ld_blocks.store_forward:period=1000000,
  MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY:u:precise=2:ldlat=4}'
  -c 1037 ./triad; done
  *The triad program is just the generation of loads/stores.

The warnings are triggered when an unexpected PEBS record (with a
different config and size) is found.

In a context switch, different events may be applied to the old task and
the new task. The sched_task callback is used to switch the PMU-specific
data. For the PEBS, the callback flushes the DS area and parses the PEBS
records from the old task when schedule out. The new task never sees the
stale PEBS records.

However, the exec() doesn't have similar support. The new command may
see the PEBS records from the old command. In the perf_event_exec(), the
ctx_resched() is invoked to reschedule the context. It may updates the
active events, which may change the global PEBS configuration. The PEBS
record from the old command may have a different config and size from
the new command. The warning is triggered.

The sched_task callback should be invoked in all the places where the
context can be changed. Add the sched_task callback in the ctx_resched()
as well.

Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Peter Zijlstra April 6, 2023, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:27:34PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Several similar kernel warnings can be triggered,
> 
>   [56605.607840] CPU0 PEBS record size 0, expected 32, config 0
>   cpuc->record_size=208
> 
> when the below commands are running in parallel for a while on SPR.
> 
>   while true; do perf record --no-buildid -a --intr-regs=AX -e
>   cpu/event=0xd0,umask=0x81/pp -c 10003 -o /dev/null ./triad; done &
> 
>   while true; do perf record -o /tmp/out -W -d -e
>   '{ld_blocks.store_forward:period=1000000,
>   MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY:u:precise=2:ldlat=4}'
>   -c 1037 ./triad; done
>   *The triad program is just the generation of loads/stores.
> 
> The warnings are triggered when an unexpected PEBS record (with a
> different config and size) is found.
> 
> In a context switch, different events may be applied to the old task and
> the new task. The sched_task callback is used to switch the PMU-specific
> data. For the PEBS, the callback flushes the DS area and parses the PEBS
> records from the old task when schedule out. The new task never sees the
> stale PEBS records.
> 
> However, the exec() doesn't have similar support. The new command may
> see the PEBS records from the old command. In the perf_event_exec(), the
> ctx_resched() is invoked to reschedule the context. It may updates the
> active events, which may change the global PEBS configuration. The PEBS
> record from the old command may have a different config and size from
> the new command. The warning is triggered.
> 
> The sched_task callback should be invoked in all the places where the
> context can be changed. Add the sched_task callback in the ctx_resched()
> as well.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index f79fd8b87f75..0c49183656fd 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2642,6 +2642,8 @@ static void perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>  		 ctx_sched_in(ctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
>  }
>  
> +static void perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in);
> +
>  /*
>   * We want to maintain the following priority of scheduling:
>   *  - CPU pinned (EVENT_CPU | EVENT_PINNED)
> @@ -2680,6 +2682,7 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>  	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx);
>  	if (task_ctx) {
>  		perf_ctx_disable(task_ctx);
> +		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(task_ctx, false);
>  		task_ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, event_type);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2698,8 +2701,10 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>  	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx);
>  
>  	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx);
> -	if (task_ctx)
> +	if (task_ctx) {
> +		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(task_ctx, true);
>  		perf_ctx_enable(task_ctx);
> +	}
>  }
>  

Urgh... yuck.. Also I think you missed perf_rotate_context() which has
an open coded resched.

But I think this is a very fragile approach. Why can't the x86 pmu/pebs
driver not flush when it's programming changes -- it, as no other, knows
when this happens.
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index f79fd8b87f75..0c49183656fd 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2642,6 +2642,8 @@  static void perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 		 ctx_sched_in(ctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
 }
 
+static void perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in);
+
 /*
  * We want to maintain the following priority of scheduling:
  *  - CPU pinned (EVENT_CPU | EVENT_PINNED)
@@ -2680,6 +2682,7 @@  static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx);
 	if (task_ctx) {
 		perf_ctx_disable(task_ctx);
+		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(task_ctx, false);
 		task_ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, event_type);
 	}
 
@@ -2698,8 +2701,10 @@  static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx);
 
 	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx);
-	if (task_ctx)
+	if (task_ctx) {
+		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(task_ctx, true);
 		perf_ctx_enable(task_ctx);
+	}
 }
 
 void perf_pmu_resched(struct pmu *pmu)