diff mbox series

[v2] ACPI: video: Fix missing native backlight on Chromebooks

Message ID 20221024141210.67784-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com
State New
Headers
Series [v2] ACPI: video: Fix missing native backlight on Chromebooks |

Commit Message

Dmitry Osipenko Oct. 24, 2022, 2:12 p.m. UTC 
  Chromebooks don't have backlight in ACPI table, they suppose to use
native backlight in this case. Check presence of the CrOS embedded
controller ACPI device and prefer the native backlight if EC found.

Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Fixes: 2600bfa3df99 ("ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
---

Changelog:

v2: - Added explanatory comment to the code and added check for the
      native backlight presence, like was requested by Hans de Goede.

 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Comments

Rafael J. Wysocki Oct. 24, 2022, 2:45 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:32 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/24/22 16:12, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Chromebooks don't have backlight in ACPI table, they suppose to use
> > native backlight in this case. Check presence of the CrOS embedded
> > controller ACPI device and prefer the native backlight if EC found.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> > Fixes: 2600bfa3df99 ("ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > v2: - Added explanatory comment to the code and added check for the
> >       native backlight presence, like was requested by Hans de Goede.
>
> Thanks this version looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Rafael, can you pick this up and send it in a fixes pull-req
> for 6.1 to Linus? Or shall I pick this one up and include it
> in my next pull-req?

It would be better if you could pick this up IMV, so please free to add

Acled-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

to it.

Thanks!

> >
> >  drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> > index 0d9064a9804c..9cd8797d12bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
> > @@ -668,6 +668,11 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
> >       { },
> >  };
> >
> > +static bool google_cros_ec_present(void)
> > +{
> > +     return acpi_dev_found("GOOG0004");
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Determine which type of backlight interface to use on this system,
> >   * First check cmdline, then dmi quirks, then do autodetect.
> > @@ -730,6 +735,13 @@ static enum acpi_backlight_type __acpi_video_get_backlight_type(bool native)
> >                       return acpi_backlight_video;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * Chromebooks that don't have backlight handle in ACPI table
> > +      * are supposed to use native backlight if it's available.
> > +      */
> > +     if (google_cros_ec_present() && native_available)
> > +             return acpi_backlight_native;
> > +
> >       /* No ACPI video (old hw), use vendor specific fw methods. */
> >       return acpi_backlight_vendor;
> >  }
>
Hans de Goede Oct. 24, 2022, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi,

On 10/24/22 16:52, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2022/10/24 23:12, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Chromebooks don't have backlight in ACPI table, they suppose to use
>> native backlight in this case. Check presence of the CrOS embedded
>> controller ACPI device and prefer the native backlight if EC found.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: 2600bfa3df99 ("ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper")
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v2: - Added explanatory comment to the code and added check for the
>>        native backlight presence, like was requested by Hans de Goede.
>>
>>   drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>> index 0d9064a9804c..9cd8797d12bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>> @@ -668,6 +668,11 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
>>       { },
>>   };
>>   +static bool google_cros_ec_present(void)
>> +{
>> +    return acpi_dev_found("GOOG0004");
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Determine which type of backlight interface to use on this system,
>>    * First check cmdline, then dmi quirks, then do autodetect.
>> @@ -730,6 +735,13 @@ static enum acpi_backlight_type __acpi_video_get_backlight_type(bool native)
>>               return acpi_backlight_video;
>>       }
>>   +    /*
>> +     * Chromebooks that don't have backlight handle in ACPI table
>> +     * are supposed to use native backlight if it's available.
>> +     */
>> +    if (google_cros_ec_present() && native_available)
>> +        return acpi_backlight_native;
>> +
>>       /* No ACPI video (old hw), use vendor specific fw methods. */
>>       return acpi_backlight_vendor;
>>   }
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The native_available check does not prevent duplicate registration if vendor backlight registers first. It was enough for the combination of ACPI video and native because ACPI video delays its registration, but it is not the case for vendor/native combination.

There are no drivers providing acpi_backlight_vendor functionality on chromebooks.

All the drivers providing acpi_backlight_vendor functionality use vendor (Dell, Acer, Asus, etc.)
specific firmware (smbios, EC bitbanging or ACPI) backlight control method which are not available
on CoreBoot based ChromeBooks.

Also notice that the theoretical problem of a vendor driver loading first was already present
before the backlight refactor which landed in 6.1 and this has never been an issue.

Regards,

Hans
Hans de Goede Oct. 24, 2022, 3:12 p.m. UTC | #3 
Hi,

On 10/24/22 16:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:32 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/24/22 16:12, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Chromebooks don't have backlight in ACPI table, they suppose to use
>>> native backlight in this case. Check presence of the CrOS embedded
>>> controller ACPI device and prefer the native backlight if EC found.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> Fixes: 2600bfa3df99 ("ACPI: video: Add acpi_video_backlight_use_native() helper")
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>>
>>> v2: - Added explanatory comment to the code and added check for the
>>>       native backlight presence, like was requested by Hans de Goede.
>>
>> Thanks this version looks good to me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>
>> Rafael, can you pick this up and send it in a fixes pull-req
>> for 6.1 to Linus? Or shall I pick this one up and include it
>> in my next pull-req?
> 
> It would be better if you could pick this up IMV, so please free to add
> 
> Acled-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Ok, I've merged this now and I'll send out fixes pull-req with this
to Linus before coming Friday.

Dmitry, Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my
fixes branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=fixes

Regards,

Hans




> 
> to it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>>>
>>>  drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> index 0d9064a9804c..9cd8797d12bb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> @@ -668,6 +668,11 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
>>>       { },
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +static bool google_cros_ec_present(void)
>>> +{
>>> +     return acpi_dev_found("GOOG0004");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Determine which type of backlight interface to use on this system,
>>>   * First check cmdline, then dmi quirks, then do autodetect.
>>> @@ -730,6 +735,13 @@ static enum acpi_backlight_type __acpi_video_get_backlight_type(bool native)
>>>                       return acpi_backlight_video;
>>>       }
>>>
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * Chromebooks that don't have backlight handle in ACPI table
>>> +      * are supposed to use native backlight if it's available.
>>> +      */
>>> +     if (google_cros_ec_present() && native_available)
>>> +             return acpi_backlight_native;
>>> +
>>>       /* No ACPI video (old hw), use vendor specific fw methods. */
>>>       return acpi_backlight_vendor;
>>>  }
>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 0d9064a9804c..9cd8797d12bb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -668,6 +668,11 @@  static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
 	{ },
 };
 
+static bool google_cros_ec_present(void)
+{
+	return acpi_dev_found("GOOG0004");
+}
+
 /*
  * Determine which type of backlight interface to use on this system,
  * First check cmdline, then dmi quirks, then do autodetect.
@@ -730,6 +735,13 @@  static enum acpi_backlight_type __acpi_video_get_backlight_type(bool native)
 			return acpi_backlight_video;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Chromebooks that don't have backlight handle in ACPI table
+	 * are supposed to use native backlight if it's available.
+	 */
+	if (google_cros_ec_present() && native_available)
+		return acpi_backlight_native;
+
 	/* No ACPI video (old hw), use vendor specific fw methods. */
 	return acpi_backlight_vendor;
 }