RDMA/restrack: Correct spelling

Message ID 20230206085725.1507-1-wangdeming@inspur.com
State New
Headers
Series RDMA/restrack: Correct spelling |

Commit Message

Deming Wang Feb. 6, 2023, 8:57 a.m. UTC
  We should use this replace thie.

Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
---
 include/rdma/restrack.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) Feb. 6, 2023, 9:08 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 5:57 PM Deming Wang wrote:
> 
> We should use this replace thie.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
> ---
>  include/rdma/restrack.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/rdma/restrack.h b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> index 79d109c47242..d7ee54b7b9ae 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/restrack.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct rdma_restrack_entry *rdma_restrack_get_byid(struct ib_device *dev,
>   * rdma_restrack_no_track() - don't add resource to the DB
>   * @res: resource entry
>   *
> - * Every user of thie API should be cross examined.
> + * Every user of this API should be cross examined.
>   * Probaby you don't need to use this function.

'Probably' instead of 'Probaby', right?

Daisuke

>   */
>  static inline void rdma_restrack_no_track(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res)
> --
> 2.27.0
  
Leon Romanovsky Feb. 7, 2023, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 03:57:25 -0500, Deming Wang wrote:
> We should use this replace thie.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] RDMA/restrack: Correct spelling
      https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/68e416255b29c2

Best regards,
  
Leon Romanovsky Feb. 7, 2023, 9:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 09:08:06AM +0000, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 5:57 PM Deming Wang wrote:
> > 
> > We should use this replace thie.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
> > ---
> >  include/rdma/restrack.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/rdma/restrack.h b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> > index 79d109c47242..d7ee54b7b9ae 100644
> > --- a/include/rdma/restrack.h
> > +++ b/include/rdma/restrack.h
> > @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct rdma_restrack_entry *rdma_restrack_get_byid(struct ib_device *dev,
> >   * rdma_restrack_no_track() - don't add resource to the DB
> >   * @res: resource entry
> >   *
> > - * Every user of thie API should be cross examined.
> > + * Every user of this API should be cross examined.
> >   * Probaby you don't need to use this function.
> 
> 'Probably' instead of 'Probaby', right?

I fixed it locally, thanks.

> 
> Daisuke
> 
> >   */
> >  static inline void rdma_restrack_no_track(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res)
> > --
> > 2.27.0
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/include/rdma/restrack.h b/include/rdma/restrack.h
index 79d109c47242..d7ee54b7b9ae 100644
--- a/include/rdma/restrack.h
+++ b/include/rdma/restrack.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@  struct rdma_restrack_entry *rdma_restrack_get_byid(struct ib_device *dev,
  * rdma_restrack_no_track() - don't add resource to the DB
  * @res: resource entry
  *
- * Every user of thie API should be cross examined.
+ * Every user of this API should be cross examined.
  * Probaby you don't need to use this function.
  */
 static inline void rdma_restrack_no_track(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res)