[v2,3/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to rtmutex torture tests
Commit Message
This patch adds randomized nested locking to the rtmutex torture
tests. Additionally it adds LOCK09 config files for testing
rtmutexes with nested locking.
This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/
Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v2:
* Add LOCK08 config file suggested by Paul McKenney
---
kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST | 1 +
.../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK09 | 6 ++++
.../rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK09.boot | 1 +
4 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK09
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK09.boot
Comments
On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
>This patch adds randomized nested locking to the rtmutex torture
>tests. Additionally it adds LOCK09 config files for testing
>rtmutexes with nested locking.
>
>This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
>by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/
>
>Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
Same comments for all the patches in the series.
>
>Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
>Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
>This patch adds randomized nested locking to the rtmutex torture
>tests. Additionally it adds LOCK09 config files for testing
>rtmutexes with nested locking.
>
>This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
>by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/
>
>Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>
>Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
>Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
@@ -506,6 +506,28 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
+static struct rt_mutex torture_nested_rtmutexes[MAX_LOCKS];
+static struct lock_class_key nested_rtmutex_keys[MAX_LOCKS];
+
+static void torture_rtmutex_init(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCKS; i++)
+ __rt_mutex_init(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i], __func__,
+ &nested_rtmutex_keys[i]);
+}
+
+static int torture_rtmutex_nested_lock(int tid __maybe_unused,
+ u32 lockset)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nlocks; i++)
+ if (lockset & (1 << i))
+ rt_mutex_lock(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i]);
+ return 0;
+}
static int torture_rtmutex_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
__acquires(torture_rtmutex)
@@ -570,11 +592,24 @@ __releases(torture_rtmutex)
rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_rtmutex);
}
+static void torture_rtmutex_nested_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused,
+ u32 lockset)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = nlocks - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ if (lockset & (1 << i))
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i]);
+}
+
static struct lock_torture_ops rtmutex_lock_ops = {
+ .init = torture_rtmutex_init,
+ .nested_lock = torture_rtmutex_nested_lock,
.writelock = torture_rtmutex_lock,
.write_delay = torture_rtmutex_delay,
.task_boost = torture_rtmutex_boost,
.writeunlock = torture_rtmutex_unlock,
+ .nested_unlock = torture_rtmutex_nested_unlock,
.readlock = NULL,
.read_delay = NULL,
.readunlock = NULL,
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ LOCK05
LOCK06
LOCK07
LOCK08
+LOCK09
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+CONFIG_SMP=y
+CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4
+CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n
+CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n
+CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+locktorture.torture_type=rtmutex_lock locktorture.nlocks=8