s390: Add -munroll-only-small-loops.
Commit Message
Hi,
inspired by Power we also introduce -munroll-only-small-loops. This
implies activating -funroll-loops and -munroll-only-small-loops at -O2
and above.
Bootstrapped and regtested.
This introduces one regression in gcc.dg/sms-compare-debug-1.c but
currently dumps for sms are broken as well. The difference is in the
location of some INSN_DELETED notes so I would consider this a minor issue.
Is it OK?
Regards
Robin
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/s390/s390-common.cc: Enable -funroll-loops and
-munroll-only-small-loops for OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS_SPEED_ONLY.
* config/s390/s390.cc (s390_loop_unroll_adjust): Do not unroll
loops larger than 12 instructions.
(s390_override_options_after_change): Set unroll options.
(s390_option_override_internal): Likewise.
* config/s390/s390.opt: Document munroll-only-small-loops.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/s390/vector/vec-copysign.c: Do not unroll.
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-quiet-uneq.c: Dito.
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-signaling-ltgt.c: Dito.
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-quiet-uneq.c: Dito.
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-signaling-ltgt.c: Dito.
---
gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc | 5 +++
gcc/config/s390/s390.cc | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
gcc/config/s390/s390.opt | 4 +++
.../gcc.target/s390/vector/vec-copysign.c | 2 +-
.../s390/zvector/autovec-double-quiet-uneq.c | 2 +-
.../zvector/autovec-double-signaling-ltgt.c | 2 +-
.../s390/zvector/autovec-float-quiet-uneq.c | 2 +-
.../zvector/autovec-float-signaling-ltgt.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
On 8/12/22 12:00, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> inspired by Power we also introduce -munroll-only-small-loops. This
> implies activating -funroll-loops and -munroll-only-small-loops at -O2
> and above.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested.
>
> This introduces one regression in gcc.dg/sms-compare-debug-1.c but
> currently dumps for sms are broken as well. The difference is in the
> location of some INSN_DELETED notes so I would consider this a minor issue.
>
> Is it OK?
>
> Regards
> Robin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * common/config/s390/s390-common.cc: Enable -funroll-loops and
> -munroll-only-small-loops for OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS_SPEED_ONLY.
> * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_loop_unroll_adjust): Do not unroll
> loops larger than 12 instructions.
> (s390_override_options_after_change): Set unroll options.
> (s390_option_override_internal): Likewise.
> * config/s390/s390.opt: Document munroll-only-small-loops.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/s390/vector/vec-copysign.c: Do not unroll.
> * gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-quiet-uneq.c: Dito.
> * gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-signaling-ltgt.c: Dito.
> * gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-quiet-uneq.c: Dito.
> * gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-signaling-ltgt.c: Dito.
Ok. Thanks!
Andreas
b/gcc/common/config/s390/s390-common.cc
@@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static const struct default_options
s390_option_optimization_table[] =
/* Enable -fsched-pressure by default when optimizing. */
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fsched_pressure, NULL, 1 },
+ /* Enable -munroll-only-small-loops with -funroll-loops to unroll small
+ loops at -O2 and above by default. */
+ { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS_SPEED_ONLY, OPT_funroll_loops, NULL, 1 },
+ { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS_SPEED_ONLY, OPT_munroll_only_small_loops, NULL,
1 },
+
/* ??? There are apparently still problems with -fcaller-saves. */
{ OPT_LEVELS_ALL, OPT_fcaller_saves, NULL, 0 },
@@ -15457,6 +15457,21 @@ s390_loop_unroll_adjust (unsigned nunroll,
struct loop *loop)
if (s390_tune < PROCESSOR_2097_Z10)
return nunroll;
+ if (unroll_only_small_loops)
+ {
+ /* Only unroll loops smaller than or equal to 12 insns. */
+ const unsigned int small_threshold = 12;
+
+ if (loop->ninsns > small_threshold)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* ???: Make this dependent on the type of registers in
+ the loop. Increase the limit for vector registers. */
+ const unsigned int max_insns = optimize >= 3 ? 36 : 24;
+
+ nunroll = MIN (nunroll, max_insns / loop->ninsns);
+ }
+
/* Count the number of memory references within the loop body. */
bbs = get_loop_body (loop);
subrtx_iterator::array_type array;
@@ -15531,6 +15546,19 @@ static void
s390_override_options_after_change (void)
{
s390_default_align (&global_options);
+
+ /* Explicit -funroll-loops turns -munroll-only-small-loops off. */
+ if ((OPTION_SET_P (flag_unroll_loops) && flag_unroll_loops)
+ || (OPTION_SET_P (flag_unroll_all_loops)
+ && flag_unroll_all_loops))
+ {
+ if (!OPTION_SET_P (unroll_only_small_loops))
+ unroll_only_small_loops = 0;
+ if (!OPTION_SET_P (flag_cunroll_grow_size))
+ flag_cunroll_grow_size = 1;
+ }
+ else if (!OPTION_SET_P (flag_cunroll_grow_size))
+ flag_cunroll_grow_size = flag_peel_loops || optimize >= 3;
}
static void
@@ -15740,6 +15768,9 @@ s390_option_override_internal (struct
gcc_options *opts,
/* Set the default alignment. */
s390_default_align (opts);
+ /* Set unroll options. */
+ s390_override_options_after_change ();
+
/* Call target specific restore function to do post-init work. At
the moment,
this just sets opts->x_s390_cost_pointer. */
s390_function_specific_restore (opts, opts_set, NULL);
@@ -321,3 +321,7 @@ and the default behavior is to emit separate
multiplication and addition
instructions for long doubles in vector registers, because measurements
show
that this improves performance. This option allows overriding it for
testing
purposes.
+
+munroll-only-small-loops
+Target Undocumented Var(unroll_only_small_loops) Init(0) Save
+; Use conservative small loop unrolling.
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/vec-copysign.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile { target { s390*-*-* } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -mzarch -fno-unroll-loops" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vgmg" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vgmf" 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vsel" 2 } } */
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-quiet-uneq.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-quiet-uneq.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z13 -mzvector -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z13 -mzvector -mzarch -fno-unroll-loops" } */
#include "autovec.h"
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-signaling-ltgt.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-double-signaling-ltgt.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch -fno-unroll-loops" } */
#include "autovec.h"
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-quiet-uneq.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-quiet-uneq.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch -fno-unroll-loops" } */
#include "autovec.h"
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-signaling-ltgt.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/autovec-float-signaling-ltgt.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -mzarch -fno-unroll-loops" } */
#include "autovec.h"