[RFC] tools/nolibc: Add gitignore to avoid git complaints about sysroot

Message ID 20230124004707.GA318943@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1
State New
Headers
Series [RFC] tools/nolibc: Add gitignore to avoid git complaints about sysroot |

Commit Message

Paul E. McKenney Jan. 24, 2023, 12:47 a.m. UTC
  Testing of nolibc can produce a tools/include/nolibc/sysroot file, which
is not known to git.  Because it is automatically generated, there is no
reason for it to be known to git.  Therefore, add a .gitignore to remove
it from git's field of view.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
  

Comments

Ammar Faizi Jan. 24, 2023, 1:06 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:47:07PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Testing of nolibc can produce a tools/include/nolibc/sysroot file, which
> is not known to git.  Because it is automatically generated, there is no
> reason for it to be known to git.  Therefore, add a .gitignore to remove
> it from git's field of view.

Yeah, I hit the same "git status" complaint and have a pending patch
for that too:

https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/89bfe86a03c173863de12.patch

^ I'll drop this one.

> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..dea22eaaed2ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +sysroot

Small nit about the naming, not so much important, but the common
pattern for directory has a trailing slash. So, I would write
"sysroot/".

".gitignore" and "tools/testing/selftests/.gitignore" do that too :-)

Reviewed-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>

Thanks!
  
Paul E. McKenney Jan. 24, 2023, 1:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:06:00AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:47:07PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Testing of nolibc can produce a tools/include/nolibc/sysroot file, which
> > is not known to git.  Because it is automatically generated, there is no
> > reason for it to be known to git.  Therefore, add a .gitignore to remove
> > it from git's field of view.
> 
> Yeah, I hit the same "git status" complaint and have a pending patch
> for that too:
> 
> https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/89bfe86a03c173863de12.patch
> 
> ^ I'll drop this one.

Actually, why don't we take yours?  Either way, I have to change something
per your feedback below.

No hurry, send it along when you normally would have.

							Thanx, Paul

> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> > Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
> > Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..dea22eaaed2ba
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +sysroot
> 
> Small nit about the naming, not so much important, but the common
> pattern for directory has a trailing slash. So, I would write
> "sysroot/".
> 
> ".gitignore" and "tools/testing/selftests/.gitignore" do that too :-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Ammar Faizi
>
  
Ammar Faizi Jan. 24, 2023, 1:17 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:12:57PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:06:00AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:47:07PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Testing of nolibc can produce a tools/include/nolibc/sysroot file, which
> > > is not known to git.  Because it is automatically generated, there is no
> > > reason for it to be known to git.  Therefore, add a .gitignore to remove
> > > it from git's field of view.
> > 
> > Yeah, I hit the same "git status" complaint and have a pending patch
> > for that too:
> > 
> > https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/89bfe86a03c173863de12.patch
> > 
> > ^ I'll drop this one.
> 
> Actually, why don't we take yours?  Either way, I have to change something
> per your feedback below.
> 
> No hurry, send it along when you normally would have.

OK, I'll keep it then. Will send it together with my other patches later :-)

Thanks.
  
Willy Tarreau Jan. 24, 2023, 3:11 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:17:01AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:12:57PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:06:00AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:47:07PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Testing of nolibc can produce a tools/include/nolibc/sysroot file, which
> > > > is not known to git.  Because it is automatically generated, there is no
> > > > reason for it to be known to git.  Therefore, add a .gitignore to remove
> > > > it from git's field of view.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I hit the same "git status" complaint and have a pending patch
> > > for that too:
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/89bfe86a03c173863de12.patch
> > > 
> > > ^ I'll drop this one.
> > 
> > Actually, why don't we take yours?  Either way, I have to change something
> > per your feedback below.
> > 
> > No hurry, send it along when you normally would have.
> 
> OK, I'll keep it then. Will send it together with my other patches later :-)

Sorry, I didn't notice it previously. Ack from me for either of your
patches of course. Ammar, please note that Paul's subject is a bit more
descriptive, so please consider updating when you resend.

Thanks!
Willy
  

Patch

diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..dea22eaaed2ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ 
+sysroot