diff mbox series

docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL

Message ID 20230122181224.53996-1-didi.debian@cknow.org
State New
Headers
Series docs: rv: Fix full name of the GPL |

Commit Message

Diederik de Haas Jan. 22, 2023, 6:12 p.m. UTC 
  Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Bagas Sanjaya Jan. 23, 2023, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:12:23PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst b/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
> index f4239192bee8..655e1bd9bbe4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
> @@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ COPYING
>  =======
>  
>  Copyright \(C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc. Free use of this software is granted under
> -the terms of the GNU Public License (GPL).
> +the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL).
 
Similar response as [1].

Thanks.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/Y83tLoHnM496akUH@debian.me/
Diederik de Haas Jan. 23, 2023, 12:48 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:15:15 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Similar response as [1].

Please disregard this patch.
I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch 
submissions, which is the following:

I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, incorrect. I 
would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the copyright holder 
which I believe is needed to change the license.

Apologies for the noise.
Bagas Sanjaya Jan. 23, 2023, 1:51 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 1/23/23 19:48, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:15:15 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Similar response as [1].
> 
> Please disregard this patch.
> I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch 
> submissions, which is the following:
> 
> I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, incorrect. I 
> would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the copyright holder 
> which I believe is needed to change the license.
> 
> Apologies for the noise.

Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by
a bot. Care to vary your sentences?
Diederik de Haas Jan. 23, 2023, 2:22 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Monday, 23 January 2023 14:51:57 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > Please disregard this patch.
> > I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch
> > submissions, which is the following:
> > 
> > I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error,
> > incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the
> > copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license.
> > 
> > Apologies for the noise.
> 
> Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by
> a bot. Care to vary your sentences?

I already got a bounce as I am now considered a spammer :-/

So now I got to figure out how to fix this clusterfsck, without being seen as
a spammer/bot, while also trying to minimize the burden on others.

I couldn't agree more with (the first paragraph of)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ad99d227-ce82-319b-6323-b70ac009d0e7@roeck-us.net/
and I therefor consider this a legal issue and not a spelling one.
I can't answer the legal issue, hence the request for retraction.

Regards,
  Diederik
Jonathan Corbet Jan. 23, 2023, 2:57 p.m. UTC | #5 
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> writes:

> On Monday, 23 January 2023 14:51:57 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> > Please disregard this patch.
>> > I'm now sending a similar response as I'm sending to my other patch
>> > submissions, which is the following:
>> > 
>> > I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error,
>> > incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the
>> > copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license.
>> > 
>> > Apologies for the noise.
>> 
>> Glad to reply, but I see your reply above as if it is written by
>> a bot. Care to vary your sentences?
>
> I already got a bounce as I am now considered a spammer :-/

No, I don't think anybody sees you as that.  Please do not worry about
Bagas; he is fond of unnecessarily picking holes in the work of others.

> So now I got to figure out how to fix this clusterfsck, without being seen as
> a spammer/bot, while also trying to minimize the burden on others.

You tried a fix which, as was pointed out, was not the right direction.
Just drop it and move onto your next contribution, and all will be well.

Thanks,

jon
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst b/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
index f4239192bee8..655e1bd9bbe4 100644
--- a/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
+++ b/Documentation/tools/rv/common_appendix.rst
@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@  COPYING
 =======
 
 Copyright \(C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc. Free use of this software is granted under
-the terms of the GNU Public License (GPL).
+the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL).