diff mbox series

[v2,1/8] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip,gpio-bank: add compatible string per SoC

Message ID 03627216-54b5-5d9b-f91d-adcd637819e3@gmail.com
State New
Headers
Series [v2,1/8] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip,gpio-bank: add compatible string per SoC |

Commit Message

Johan Jonker Jan. 21, 2023, 11:06 a.m. UTC 
  Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
Compatible strings should be SoC related.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
 .../bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml     | 26 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.20.1

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Jan. 22, 2023, 1:52 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 21/01/2023 12:06, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml     | 26 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> index affd823c8..a604c3638 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> @@ -11,9 +11,27 @@ maintainers:
> 
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    enum:
> -      - rockchip,gpio-bank
> -      - rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0
> +    oneOf:
> +      - const: rockchip,gpio-bank
> +      - const: rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0

That's an enum so keep them like that

> +      - items:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Linus Walleij Jan. 26, 2023, 1:44 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:

> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Linus Walleij Feb. 8, 2023, 11:08 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:

> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>

Bartosz can you merge this one patch and keep the rest back
so we get a more defined DT binding baseline?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Bartosz Golaszewski Feb. 10, 2023, 8:03 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:08 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> > Compatible strings should be SoC related.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
>
> Bartosz can you merge this one patch and keep the rest back
> so we get a more defined DT binding baseline?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Krzysztof, you left your ack but seem to also have pointed out an
issue - do you want me to fix it up somehow before applying? Drop the
oneOf and turn it back into an enum?

Bart
Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 12, 2023, 4:14 p.m. UTC | #5 
On 10/02/2023 21:03, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:08 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
>>> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bartosz can you merge this one patch and keep the rest back
>> so we get a more defined DT binding baseline?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
> 
> Krzysztof, you left your ack but seem to also have pointed out an
> issue - do you want me to fix it up somehow before applying? Drop the
> oneOf and turn it back into an enum?


Sure, you can apply with my comment fixed but then just please check
with `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="xxx.yaml"`, that
indentation is not mixed up.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Bartosz Golaszewski Feb. 15, 2023, 3:02 p.m. UTC | #6 
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 5:14 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2023 21:03, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:08 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> >>> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Bartosz can you merge this one patch and keep the rest back
> >> so we get a more defined DT binding baseline?
> >>
> >> Yours,
> >> Linus Walleij
> >
> > Krzysztof, you left your ack but seem to also have pointed out an
> > issue - do you want me to fix it up somehow before applying? Drop the
> > oneOf and turn it back into an enum?
>
>
> Sure, you can apply with my comment fixed but then just please check
> with `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="xxx.yaml"`, that
> indentation is not mixed up.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

I prefer to get your ack on the final version really.

Johan, please address the enum issue and resend just this patch.

Bart
Johan Jonker Feb. 15, 2023, 4:14 p.m. UTC | #7 
On 2/15/23 16:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 5:14 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/02/2023 21:03, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:08 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:06 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
>>>>> Compatible strings should be SoC related.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Bartosz can you merge this one patch and keep the rest back
>>>> so we get a more defined DT binding baseline?
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Linus Walleij
>>>
>>> Krzysztof, you left your ack but seem to also have pointed out an
>>> issue - do you want me to fix it up somehow before applying? Drop the
>>> oneOf and turn it back into an enum?
>>
>>
>> Sure, you can apply with my comment fixed but then just please check
>> with `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="xxx.yaml"`, that
>> indentation is not mixed up.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> I prefer to get your ack on the final version really.
> 

> Johan, please address the enum issue and resend just this patch.

I changed to oneOf, because with enum I didn't get it working.
With 2 enum's it complains about: is not of type 'string'.
I'm out of ideas...
Maybe it's something simple that I overlook.
Could Krzysztof give an example?

Johan


> 
> Bart
Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 15, 2023, 8:15 p.m. UTC | #8 
On 15/02/2023 17:14, Johan Jonker wrote:

> 
>> Johan, please address the enum issue and resend just this patch.
> 
> I changed to oneOf, because with enum I didn't get it working.
> With 2 enum's it complains about: is not of type 'string'.
> I'm out of ideas...
> Maybe it's something simple that I overlook.
> Could Krzysztof give an example?

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2c2x0.yaml

It should look like this, if my email did not mess up indents:

+    oneOf:
+      - enum:
+          - rockchip,gpio-bank
+          - rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0
+      - items:
+          - enum:

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
index affd823c8..a604c3638 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
@@ -11,9 +11,27 @@  maintainers:

 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - rockchip,gpio-bank
-      - rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0
+    oneOf:
+      - const: rockchip,gpio-bank
+      - const: rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank0
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - rockchip,px30-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3036-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3066a-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3128-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3228-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3288-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3328-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3308-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3368-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3399-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3568-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rk3588-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rv1108-gpio-bank
+              - rockchip,rv1126-gpio-bank
+          - const: rockchip,gpio-bank

   reg:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -75,7 +93,7 @@  examples:
       };

       gpio1: gpio@2003c000 {
-        compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
+        compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-gpio-bank", "rockchip,gpio-bank";
         reg = <0x2003c000 0x100>;
         interrupts = <GIC_SPI 55 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
         clocks = <&clk_gates8 10>;