diff mbox series

[V2,06/11] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Use a carveout to authenticate modem headers

Message ID 20230109034843.23759-7-quic_sibis@quicinc.com
State New
Headers
Series Fix XPU violation during modem metadata authentication |

Commit Message

Sibi Sankar Jan. 9, 2023, 3:48 a.m. UTC 
  Any access to the dynamically allocated metadata region by the application
processor after assigning it to the remote Q6 will result in a XPU
violation. Fix this by replacing the dynamically allocated memory region
with a no-map carveout and unmap the modem metadata memory region before
passing control to the remote Q6.

Reported-and-tested-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Fixes: 6c5a9dc2481b ("remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch")
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
---

v2:
 * Revert no_kernel_mapping [Mani/Robin]

 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Manivannan Sadhasivam Jan. 9, 2023, 8:32 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:18:38AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Any access to the dynamically allocated metadata region by the application
> processor after assigning it to the remote Q6 will result in a XPU
> violation. Fix this by replacing the dynamically allocated memory region
> with a no-map carveout and unmap the modem metadata memory region before
> passing control to the remote Q6.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
> Fixes: 6c5a9dc2481b ("remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch")
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
>  * Revert no_kernel_mapping [Mani/Robin]
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index e2f765f87ec9..b7a158751cef 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct q6v5 {
>  	size_t mba_size;
>  	size_t dp_size;
>  
> +	phys_addr_t mdata_phys;
>  	phys_addr_t mpss_phys;
>  	phys_addr_t mpss_reloc;
>  	size_t mpss_size;
> @@ -973,15 +974,29 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
>  	if (IS_ERR(metadata))
>  		return PTR_ERR(metadata);
>  
> -	ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
> -	if (!ptr) {
> -		kfree(metadata);
> -		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (qproc->mdata_phys) {
> +		phys = qproc->mdata_phys;
> +		ptr = memremap(qproc->mdata_phys, size, MEMREMAP_WC);
> +		if (!ptr) {
> +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
> +				&qproc->mdata_phys, size);
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +			goto free_dma_attrs;

There is no memory to free at this point.

Thanks,
Mani

> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
> +		if (!ptr) {
> +			kfree(metadata);
> +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	memcpy(ptr, metadata, size);
>  
> +	if (qproc->mdata_phys)
> +		memunmap(ptr);
> +
>  	/* Hypervisor mapping to access metadata by modem */
>  	mdata_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
>  	ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &mdata_perm, false, true,
> @@ -1010,7 +1025,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
>  			 "mdt buffer not reclaimed system may become unstable\n");
>  
>  free_dma_attrs:
> -	dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
> +	if (!qproc->mdata_phys)
> +		dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
>  	kfree(metadata);
>  
>  	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> @@ -1893,6 +1909,26 @@ static int q6v5_alloc_memory_region(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>  	qproc->mpss_phys = qproc->mpss_reloc = r.start;
>  	qproc->mpss_size = resource_size(&r);
>  
> +	if (!child) {
> +		node = of_parse_phandle(qproc->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 2);
> +	} else {
> +		child = of_get_child_by_name(qproc->dev->of_node, "metadata");
> +		node = of_parse_phandle(child, "memory-region", 0);
> +		of_node_put(child);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!node)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &r);
> +	of_node_put(node);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to resolve metadata region\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	qproc->mdata_phys = r.start;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Sibi Sankar Jan. 9, 2023, 10:05 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hey Mani,

On 1/9/23 14:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:18:38AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Any access to the dynamically allocated metadata region by the application
>> processor after assigning it to the remote Q6 will result in a XPU
>> violation. Fix this by replacing the dynamically allocated memory region
>> with a no-map carveout and unmap the modem metadata memory region before
>> passing control to the remote Q6.
>>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
>> Fixes: 6c5a9dc2481b ("remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch")
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2:
>>   * Revert no_kernel_mapping [Mani/Robin]
>>
>>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> index e2f765f87ec9..b7a158751cef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct q6v5 {
>>   	size_t mba_size;
>>   	size_t dp_size;
>>   
>> +	phys_addr_t mdata_phys;
>>   	phys_addr_t mpss_phys;
>>   	phys_addr_t mpss_reloc;
>>   	size_t mpss_size;
>> @@ -973,15 +974,29 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
>>   	if (IS_ERR(metadata))
>>   		return PTR_ERR(metadata);
>>   
>> -	ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
>> -	if (!ptr) {
>> -		kfree(metadata);
>> -		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
>> -		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	if (qproc->mdata_phys) {
>> +		phys = qproc->mdata_phys;
>> +		ptr = memremap(qproc->mdata_phys, size, MEMREMAP_WC);
>> +		if (!ptr) {
>> +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
>> +				&qproc->mdata_phys, size);
>> +			ret = -EBUSY;
>> +			goto free_dma_attrs;
> 
> There is no memory to free at this point.

we would just free the metadata in the no-map carveout scenario since
mdata_phys wouldn't be NULL. I can do a kfree(metadata) directly from
this branch and return as well if you think it makes things more
readable.

> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
>> +		if (!ptr) {
>> +			kfree(metadata);
>> +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	memcpy(ptr, metadata, size);
>>   
>> +	if (qproc->mdata_phys)
>> +		memunmap(ptr);
>> +
>>   	/* Hypervisor mapping to access metadata by modem */
>>   	mdata_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
>>   	ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &mdata_perm, false, true,
>> @@ -1010,7 +1025,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
>>   			 "mdt buffer not reclaimed system may become unstable\n");
>>   
>>   free_dma_attrs:
>> -	dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
>> +	if (!qproc->mdata_phys)
>> +		dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
>>   	kfree(metadata);
>>   
>>   	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>> @@ -1893,6 +1909,26 @@ static int q6v5_alloc_memory_region(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>>   	qproc->mpss_phys = qproc->mpss_reloc = r.start;
>>   	qproc->mpss_size = resource_size(&r);
>>   
>> +	if (!child) {
>> +		node = of_parse_phandle(qproc->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 2);
>> +	} else {
>> +		child = of_get_child_by_name(qproc->dev->of_node, "metadata");
>> +		node = of_parse_phandle(child, "memory-region", 0);
>> +		of_node_put(child);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &r);
>> +	of_node_put(node);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to resolve metadata region\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	qproc->mdata_phys = r.start;
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
Manivannan Sadhasivam Jan. 11, 2023, 11:23 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:35:31PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Hey Mani,
> 
> On 1/9/23 14:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:18:38AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > > Any access to the dynamically allocated metadata region by the application
> > > processor after assigning it to the remote Q6 will result in a XPU
> > > violation. Fix this by replacing the dynamically allocated memory region
> > > with a no-map carveout and unmap the modem metadata memory region before
> > > passing control to the remote Q6.
> > > 
> > > Reported-and-tested-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
> > > Fixes: 6c5a9dc2481b ("remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v2:
> > >   * Revert no_kernel_mapping [Mani/Robin]
> > > 
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > index e2f765f87ec9..b7a158751cef 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct q6v5 {
> > >   	size_t mba_size;
> > >   	size_t dp_size;
> > > +	phys_addr_t mdata_phys;
> > >   	phys_addr_t mpss_phys;
> > >   	phys_addr_t mpss_reloc;
> > >   	size_t mpss_size;
> > > @@ -973,15 +974,29 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
> > >   	if (IS_ERR(metadata))
> > >   		return PTR_ERR(metadata);
> > > -	ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
> > > -	if (!ptr) {
> > > -		kfree(metadata);
> > > -		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
> > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +	if (qproc->mdata_phys) {
> > > +		phys = qproc->mdata_phys;
> > > +		ptr = memremap(qproc->mdata_phys, size, MEMREMAP_WC);
> > > +		if (!ptr) {
> > > +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
> > > +				&qproc->mdata_phys, size);
> > > +			ret = -EBUSY;
> > > +			goto free_dma_attrs;
> > 
> > There is no memory to free at this point.
> 
> we would just free the metadata in the no-map carveout scenario since
> mdata_phys wouldn't be NULL. I can do a kfree(metadata) directly from
> this branch and return as well if you think it makes things more
> readable.
> 

Oops, I missed that. But yeah it is confusing too with the current way of
freeing metadata. I'd suggest using a separate label instead.

Thanks,
Mani

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > > +		}
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
> > > +		if (!ptr) {
> > > +			kfree(metadata);
> > > +			dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
> > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > +		}
> > >   	}
> > >   	memcpy(ptr, metadata, size);
> > > +	if (qproc->mdata_phys)
> > > +		memunmap(ptr);
> > > +
> > >   	/* Hypervisor mapping to access metadata by modem */
> > >   	mdata_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
> > >   	ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &mdata_perm, false, true,
> > > @@ -1010,7 +1025,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
> > >   			 "mdt buffer not reclaimed system may become unstable\n");
> > >   free_dma_attrs:
> > > -	dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
> > > +	if (!qproc->mdata_phys)
> > > +		dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
> > >   	kfree(metadata);
> > >   	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > > @@ -1893,6 +1909,26 @@ static int q6v5_alloc_memory_region(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >   	qproc->mpss_phys = qproc->mpss_reloc = r.start;
> > >   	qproc->mpss_size = resource_size(&r);
> > > +	if (!child) {
> > > +		node = of_parse_phandle(qproc->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 2);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		child = of_get_child_by_name(qproc->dev->of_node, "metadata");
> > > +		node = of_parse_phandle(child, "memory-region", 0);
> > > +		of_node_put(child);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (!node)
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &r);
> > > +	of_node_put(node);
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to resolve metadata region\n");
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	qproc->mdata_phys = r.start;
> > > +
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index e2f765f87ec9..b7a158751cef 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@  struct q6v5 {
 	size_t mba_size;
 	size_t dp_size;
 
+	phys_addr_t mdata_phys;
 	phys_addr_t mpss_phys;
 	phys_addr_t mpss_reloc;
 	size_t mpss_size;
@@ -973,15 +974,29 @@  static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
 	if (IS_ERR(metadata))
 		return PTR_ERR(metadata);
 
-	ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
-	if (!ptr) {
-		kfree(metadata);
-		dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (qproc->mdata_phys) {
+		phys = qproc->mdata_phys;
+		ptr = memremap(qproc->mdata_phys, size, MEMREMAP_WC);
+		if (!ptr) {
+			dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
+				&qproc->mdata_phys, size);
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			goto free_dma_attrs;
+		}
+	} else {
+		ptr = dma_alloc_attrs(qproc->dev, size, &phys, GFP_KERNEL, dma_attrs);
+		if (!ptr) {
+			kfree(metadata);
+			dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to allocate mdt buffer\n");
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
 	}
 
 	memcpy(ptr, metadata, size);
 
+	if (qproc->mdata_phys)
+		memunmap(ptr);
+
 	/* Hypervisor mapping to access metadata by modem */
 	mdata_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
 	ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &mdata_perm, false, true,
@@ -1010,7 +1025,8 @@  static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw,
 			 "mdt buffer not reclaimed system may become unstable\n");
 
 free_dma_attrs:
-	dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
+	if (!qproc->mdata_phys)
+		dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
 	kfree(metadata);
 
 	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
@@ -1893,6 +1909,26 @@  static int q6v5_alloc_memory_region(struct q6v5 *qproc)
 	qproc->mpss_phys = qproc->mpss_reloc = r.start;
 	qproc->mpss_size = resource_size(&r);
 
+	if (!child) {
+		node = of_parse_phandle(qproc->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 2);
+	} else {
+		child = of_get_child_by_name(qproc->dev->of_node, "metadata");
+		node = of_parse_phandle(child, "memory-region", 0);
+		of_node_put(child);
+	}
+
+	if (!node)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &r);
+	of_node_put(node);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to resolve metadata region\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	qproc->mdata_phys = r.start;
+
 	return 0;
 }