[v2] HID: Recognize sensors with application collections too.

Message ID EFCEA45A-C6F4-477A-B011-9C9E6E61E488@live.com
State New
Headers
Series [v2] HID: Recognize sensors with application collections too. |

Commit Message

Aditya Garg Jan. 10, 2023, 8:57 a.m. UTC
  From: Ronald Tschalär <ronald@innovation.ch>

According to HUTRR39 logical sensor devices may be nested inside
physical collections or may be specified in multiple top-level
application collections (see page 59, strategies 1 and 2). However,
the current code was only recognizing those with physical collections.

This issue turned up in the T2 MacBook Pro's which define the ALS in
a top-level application collection.

Signed-off-by: Ronald Tschalär <ronald@innovation.ch>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
—
V2 :- Add missing signed-off-by
 drivers/hid/hid-core.c       | 3 ++-
 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.38.1
  

Comments

srinivas pandruvada Jan. 10, 2023, 10:16 p.m. UTC | #1
Don't add full stop at the end.

HID: Recognize sensors with application collection

On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 08:57 +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Ronald Tschalär <ronald@innovation.ch>
> 
> According to HUTRR39 logical sensor devices may be nested inside
> physical collections or may be specified in multiple top-level
> application collections (see page 59, strategies 1 and 2). However,
> the current code was only recognizing those with physical
> collections.
> 
> This issue turned up in the T2 MacBook Pro's which define the ALS in
> a top-level application collection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ronald Tschalär <ronald@innovation.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
> —
> V2 :- Add missing signed-off-by
>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c       | 3 ++-
>  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index b7f5566e338d..8fcd663b10e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static void hid_scan_collection(struct hid_parser
> *parser, unsigned type)
>         int i;
>  
>         if (((parser->global.usage_page << 16) == HID_UP_SENSOR) &&
> -           type == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL)
> +           (type == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL ||
> +            type == HID_COLLECTION_APPLICATION))
>                 hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB;
>  
>         if (hid->vendor == USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT &&
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-
> hub.c
> index 6abd3e2a9094..d03dc4ca095f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ int sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(struct
> hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>                 for (i = 0; i < report->maxfield; ++i) {
>                         field = report->field[i];
>                         if (field->maxusage) {
> -                               if (field->physical == usage_id &&
> +                               if ((field->physical == usage_id ||
> +                                    field->application == usage_id)
> &&
>                                         (field->logical ==
> attr_usage_id ||
>                                         field->usage[0].hid ==
>                                                         attr_usage_id
> ) &&
> @@ -506,7 +507,8 @@ static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device
> *hdev,
>                                         collection->usage);
>  
>                 callback = sensor_hub_get_callback(hdev,
> -                               report->field[i]->physical,
> +                               report->field[i]->physical ?:
> +                                       report->field[i]->application
Better not use language extensions. Simple to use

 report->field[i]->physical ?  report->field[i]->physical : report-
>field[i]->application

Otherwise patch is fine.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> ,
>                                 report->field[i]-
> >usage[0].collection_index,
>                                 &hsdev, &priv);
>                 if (!callback) {
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>
  
Aditya Garg Jan. 11, 2023, 10:06 a.m. UTC | #2
> On 11-Jan-2023, at 3:46 AM, srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Don't add full stop at the end.
> 
> HID: Recognize sensors with application collection
> 
> Better not use language extensions. Simple to use
> 
> report->field[i]->physical ?  report->field[i]->physical : report-
>> field[i]->application
> 
> 

Sending a v3 with the changes.
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index b7f5566e338d..8fcd663b10e2 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -804,7 +804,8 @@  static void hid_scan_collection(struct hid_parser *parser, unsigned type)
 	int i;
 
 	if (((parser->global.usage_page << 16) == HID_UP_SENSOR) &&
-	    type == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL)
+	    (type == HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL ||
+	     type == HID_COLLECTION_APPLICATION))
 		hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB;
 
 	if (hid->vendor == USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT &&
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
index 6abd3e2a9094..d03dc4ca095f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
@@ -397,7 +397,8 @@  int sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
 		for (i = 0; i < report->maxfield; ++i) {
 			field = report->field[i];
 			if (field->maxusage) {
-				if (field->physical == usage_id &&
+				if ((field->physical == usage_id ||
+				     field->application == usage_id) &&
 					(field->logical == attr_usage_id ||
 					field->usage[0].hid ==
 							attr_usage_id) &&
@@ -506,7 +507,8 @@  static int sensor_hub_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
 					collection->usage);
 
 		callback = sensor_hub_get_callback(hdev,
-				report->field[i]->physical,
+				report->field[i]->physical ?:
+					report->field[i]->application,
 				report->field[i]->usage[0].collection_index,
 				&hsdev, &priv);
 		if (!callback) {