[v1,6/7] vfio/ccw: replace vfio_init_device with _alloc_

Message ID 20221019162135.798901-7-farman@linux.ibm.com
State New
Headers
Series vfio-ccw parent rework |

Commit Message

Eric Farman Oct. 19, 2022, 4:21 p.m. UTC
  Now that we have a reasonable separation of structs that follow
the subchannel and mdev lifecycles, there's no reason we can't
call the official vfio_alloc_device routine for our private data,
and behave like everyone else.

Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c     | 29 -----------------------------
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c     | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h |  3 ---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c            |  3 ---
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe Oct. 19, 2022, 5:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:

>  /*
>   * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> - *
> - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
>   */
>  int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
>  		     const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
>  	ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);

Should be made static as well

Jason
  
Eric Farman Oct. 19, 2022, 5:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 14:15 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
> 
> >  /*
> >   * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> > - *
> > - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
> >   */
> >  int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device
> > *dev,
> >                      const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> > @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device
> > *device, struct device *dev,
> >         ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
> 
> Should be made static as well

Agreed. Only reason I didn't was there's a prototype in
include/linux/vfio.h to satisfy the call to vfio_init_device from
_vfio_alloc_device, and I didn't want to get into moving things around
if I didn't need to. I can do that on top, if you'd like.

Eric
  
Jason Gunthorpe Oct. 20, 2022, 12:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:57:41PM -0400, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 14:15 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
> > 
> > >  /*
> > >   * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
> > > - *
> > > - * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
> > >   */
> > >  int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device
> > > *dev,
> > >                      const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
> > > @@ -422,7 +420,6 @@ int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device
> > > *device, struct device *dev,
> > >         ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
> > >         return ret;
> > >  }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
> > 
> > Should be made static as well
> 
> Agreed. Only reason I didn't was there's a prototype in
> include/linux/vfio.h to satisfy the call to vfio_init_device from
> _vfio_alloc_device, and I didn't want to get into moving things around
> if I didn't need to. I can do that on top, if you'd like.

You can just add a one line forward static declaration at the top of
the file in this patch.

Jason
  
Tian, Kevin Nov. 1, 2022, 9:10 a.m. UTC | #4
> From: Eric Farman
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 12:22 AM
> 
> Now that we have a reasonable separation of structs that follow
> the subchannel and mdev lifecycles, there's no reason we can't
> call the official vfio_alloc_device routine for our private data,
> and behave like everyone else.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>

This looks good to me. With Jason's suggestion handled,

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 686a9b9f6731..9bbf41315aca 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -146,35 +146,6 @@  static void vfio_ccw_sch_irq(struct subchannel *sch)
 	vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_INTERRUPT);
 }
 
-struct vfio_ccw_private *vfio_ccw_alloc_private(struct subchannel *sch)
-{
-	struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
-
-	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!private)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
-	return private;
-}
-
-void vfio_ccw_free_private(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
-{
-	struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
-		list_del(&crw->next);
-		kfree(crw);
-	}
-
-	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
-	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
-	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
-	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
-	kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
-	mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
-	kfree(private);
-}
-
 static void vfio_ccw_free_parent(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct vfio_ccw_parent *parent = container_of(dev, struct vfio_ccw_parent, dev);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 261cb8150abb..9619dc35080f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -103,15 +103,10 @@  static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 	struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
 	int ret;
 
-	private = vfio_ccw_alloc_private(sch);
-	if (!private)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	ret = vfio_init_device(&private->vdev, &mdev->dev, &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
-	if (ret) {
-		kfree(private);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	private = vfio_alloc_device(vfio_ccw_private, vdev, &mdev->dev,
+				    &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
+	if (IS_ERR(private))
+		return PTR_ERR(private);
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(&parent->dev, private);
 
@@ -136,8 +131,21 @@  static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct vfio_ccw_private *private =
 		container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
+	struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
+		list_del(&crw->next);
+		kfree(crw);
+	}
+
+	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
+	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
+	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
+	kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
+	kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
+	mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
 
-	vfio_ccw_free_private(private);
+	vfio_free_device(vdev);
 }
 
 static void vfio_ccw_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index ddaf6846022d..2ca408881659 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -116,9 +116,6 @@  int vfio_ccw_sch_quiesce(struct subchannel *sch);
 void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work);
 void vfio_ccw_crw_todo(struct work_struct *work);
 
-struct vfio_ccw_private *vfio_ccw_alloc_private(struct subchannel *sch);
-void vfio_ccw_free_private(struct vfio_ccw_private *private);
-
 extern struct mdev_driver vfio_ccw_mdev_driver;
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 2d168793d4e1..28f36c6d9d3f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -386,8 +386,6 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_vfio_alloc_device);
 
 /*
  * Initialize a vfio_device so it can be registered to vfio core.
- *
- * Only vfio-ccw driver should call this interface.
  */
 int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 		     const struct vfio_device_ops *ops)
@@ -422,7 +420,6 @@  int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 	ida_free(&vfio.device_ida, device->index);
 	return ret;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_init_device);
 
 /*
  * The helper called by driver @release callback to free the device