[1/5] media: mediatek: vcodec: add params to record lat and core lat_buf count

Message ID 20221210073218.17350-2-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com
State New
Headers
Series media: mediatek: vcodec: Fix power_VideoCall test fail |

Commit Message

Yunfei Dong (董云飞) Dec. 10, 2022, 7:32 a.m. UTC
  Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core work
queue, adding params to record the buf count.

Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core hardware decode")
Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
---
 .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-
 .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h |  9 ++++++
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Dec. 13, 2022, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 10/12/22 08:32, Yunfei Dong ha scritto:
> Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core work
> queue, adding params to record the buf count.
> 
> Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core hardware decode")
> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h |  9 ++++++
>   2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> index dc2004790a47..af7ddba1923a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);

I doubt that you need to use this mutex, as you're using atomics...

> +
> +	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> +		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> +	else
> +		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
> +

This branch (with the relevant appropriate changes) can be simplified as

	atomic_inc(&msg_queue->list_cnt[hardware_index]);

...where list_cnt is an array, and hardware_index is an enumeration.	

> +	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +
> +	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> +		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> +	else
> +		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);

Same here.

> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +}
> +

Regards,
Angelo
  
Yunfei Dong (董云飞) Dec. 19, 2022, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Angelo,

Thanks for your suggestion.
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 10:09 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 10/12/22 08:32, Yunfei Dong ha scritto:
> > Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core
> > work
> > queue, adding params to record the buf count.
> > 
> > Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core
> > hardware decode")
> > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32
> > ++++++++++++++++++-
> >   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h |  9 ++++++
> >   2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > index dc2004790a47..af7ddba1923a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int
> > hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
> >   	}
> >   }
> >   
> > +static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
> > int hardware_index)
> > +{
> > +	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> 
> I doubt that you need to use this mutex, as you're using atomics...
> 
Can be removed.
> > +
> > +	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> > +		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> > +	else
> > +		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
> > +
> 
> This branch (with the relevant appropriate changes) can be simplified
> as
> 
> 	atomic_inc(&msg_queue->list_cnt[hardware_index]);
> 
> ...where list_cnt is an array, and hardware_index is an enumeration.	
> 
Only use lat and core, no need to using a array for every hardware.

Best Regards,
Yunfei Dong
> > +	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
> > int hardware_index)
> > +{
> > +	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +
> > +	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> > +		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> > +	else
> > +		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
> 
> Same here.
> 
> > +
> > +	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
index dc2004790a47..af7ddba1923a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
@@ -52,6 +52,30 @@  static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
 	}
 }
 
+static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
+	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
+		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
+	else
+		atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+}
+
+static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
+	if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
+		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
+	else
+		atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+}
+
 int vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx, struct vdec_lat_buf *buf)
 {
 	struct list_head *head;
@@ -72,6 +96,7 @@  int vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx, struct vdec_lat_buf
 		queue_work(buf->ctx->dev->core_workqueue,
 			   &buf->ctx->msg_queue.core_work);
 
+	vdec_msg_queue_inc(&buf->ctx->msg_queue, msg_ctx->hardware_index);
 	mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "enqueue buf type: %d addr: 0x%p num: %d",
 		       msg_ctx->hardware_index, buf, msg_ctx->ready_num);
 	spin_unlock(&msg_ctx->ready_lock);
@@ -127,6 +152,7 @@  struct vdec_lat_buf *vdec_msg_queue_dqbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	list_del(head);
+	vdec_msg_queue_dec(&buf->ctx->msg_queue, msg_ctx->hardware_index);
 
 	msg_ctx->ready_num--;
 	mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "dqueue buf type:%d addr: 0x%p num: %d",
@@ -241,10 +267,14 @@  int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
 
 	vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(&msg_queue->lat_ctx, MTK_VDEC_LAT0);
 	INIT_WORK(&msg_queue->core_work, vdec_msg_queue_core_work);
+
+	atomic_set(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt, 0);
+	atomic_set(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt, 0);
+	mutex_init(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
 	msg_queue->wdma_addr.size =
 		vde_msg_queue_get_trans_size(ctx->picinfo.buf_w,
 					     ctx->picinfo.buf_h);
-
 	err = mtk_vcodec_mem_alloc(ctx, &msg_queue->wdma_addr);
 	if (err) {
 		mtk_v4l2_err("failed to allocate wdma_addr buf");
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h
index c43d427f5f54..94e01a618c5a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@  struct vdec_lat_buf {
  * @wdma_wptr_addr: ube write point
  * @core_work: core hardware work
  * @lat_ctx: used to store lat buffer list
+ *
+ * @lat_list_cnt: used to record each instance lat list count
+ * @core_list_cnt: used to record each instance core list count
+ * @list_cnt_mutex: used to protect list count
  */
 struct vdec_msg_queue {
 	struct vdec_lat_buf lat_buf[NUM_BUFFER_COUNT];
@@ -82,6 +86,11 @@  struct vdec_msg_queue {
 
 	struct work_struct core_work;
 	struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx lat_ctx;
+
+	atomic_t lat_list_cnt;
+	atomic_t core_list_cnt;
+	/* Protects access to lat and core list cnt */
+	struct mutex list_cnt_mutex;
 };
 
 /**