[1/5] media: mediatek: vcodec: add params to record lat and core lat_buf count
Commit Message
Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core work
queue, adding params to record the buf count.
Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core hardware decode")
Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
---
.../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-
.../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h | 9 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Il 10/12/22 08:32, Yunfei Dong ha scritto:
> Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core work
> queue, adding params to record the buf count.
>
> Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core hardware decode")
> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-
> .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h | 9 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> index dc2004790a47..af7ddba1923a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
> }
> }
>
> +static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
I doubt that you need to use this mutex, as you're using atomics...
> +
> + if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> + atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> + else
> + atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
> +
This branch (with the relevant appropriate changes) can be simplified as
atomic_inc(&msg_queue->list_cnt[hardware_index]);
...where list_cnt is an array, and hardware_index is an enumeration.
> + mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +
> + if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> + atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> + else
> + atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
Same here.
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> +}
> +
Regards,
Angelo
Hi Angelo,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 10:09 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 10/12/22 08:32, Yunfei Dong ha scritto:
> > Using lat_buf to share decoder information between lat and core
> > work
> > queue, adding params to record the buf count.
> >
> > Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core
> > hardware decode")
> > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c | 32
> > ++++++++++++++++++-
> > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h | 9 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > index dc2004790a47..af7ddba1923a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int
> > hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
> > int hardware_index)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
>
> I doubt that you need to use this mutex, as you're using atomics...
>
Can be removed.
> > +
> > + if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> > + atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> > + else
> > + atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
> > +
>
> This branch (with the relevant appropriate changes) can be simplified
> as
>
> atomic_inc(&msg_queue->list_cnt[hardware_index]);
>
> ...where list_cnt is an array, and hardware_index is an enumeration.
>
Only use lat and core, no need to using a array for every hardware.
Best Regards,
Yunfei Dong
> > + mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
> > int hardware_index)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +
> > + if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
> > + atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
> > + else
> > + atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
>
> Same here.
>
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
@@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static struct list_head *vdec_get_buf_list(int hardware_index, struct vdec_lat_b
}
}
+static void vdec_msg_queue_inc(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
+ if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
+ atomic_inc(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
+ else
+ atomic_inc(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+}
+
+static void vdec_msg_queue_dec(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, int hardware_index)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
+ if (hardware_index == MTK_VDEC_CORE)
+ atomic_dec(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt);
+ else
+ atomic_dec(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+}
+
int vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx, struct vdec_lat_buf *buf)
{
struct list_head *head;
@@ -72,6 +96,7 @@ int vdec_msg_queue_qbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx, struct vdec_lat_buf
queue_work(buf->ctx->dev->core_workqueue,
&buf->ctx->msg_queue.core_work);
+ vdec_msg_queue_inc(&buf->ctx->msg_queue, msg_ctx->hardware_index);
mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "enqueue buf type: %d addr: 0x%p num: %d",
msg_ctx->hardware_index, buf, msg_ctx->ready_num);
spin_unlock(&msg_ctx->ready_lock);
@@ -127,6 +152,7 @@ struct vdec_lat_buf *vdec_msg_queue_dqbuf(struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *msg_ctx)
return NULL;
}
list_del(head);
+ vdec_msg_queue_dec(&buf->ctx->msg_queue, msg_ctx->hardware_index);
msg_ctx->ready_num--;
mtk_v4l2_debug(3, "dqueue buf type:%d addr: 0x%p num: %d",
@@ -241,10 +267,14 @@ int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(&msg_queue->lat_ctx, MTK_VDEC_LAT0);
INIT_WORK(&msg_queue->core_work, vdec_msg_queue_core_work);
+
+ atomic_set(&msg_queue->lat_list_cnt, 0);
+ atomic_set(&msg_queue->core_list_cnt, 0);
+ mutex_init(&msg_queue->list_cnt_mutex);
+
msg_queue->wdma_addr.size =
vde_msg_queue_get_trans_size(ctx->picinfo.buf_w,
ctx->picinfo.buf_h);
-
err = mtk_vcodec_mem_alloc(ctx, &msg_queue->wdma_addr);
if (err) {
mtk_v4l2_err("failed to allocate wdma_addr buf");
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ struct vdec_lat_buf {
* @wdma_wptr_addr: ube write point
* @core_work: core hardware work
* @lat_ctx: used to store lat buffer list
+ *
+ * @lat_list_cnt: used to record each instance lat list count
+ * @core_list_cnt: used to record each instance core list count
+ * @list_cnt_mutex: used to protect list count
*/
struct vdec_msg_queue {
struct vdec_lat_buf lat_buf[NUM_BUFFER_COUNT];
@@ -82,6 +86,11 @@ struct vdec_msg_queue {
struct work_struct core_work;
struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx lat_ctx;
+
+ atomic_t lat_list_cnt;
+ atomic_t core_list_cnt;
+ /* Protects access to lat and core list cnt */
+ struct mutex list_cnt_mutex;
};
/**