diff mbox series

[2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add trogdor eDP/touchscreen regulator off-on-time

Message ID 20221208111910.2.I65ac577411b017eff50e7a4fda254e5583ccdc48@changeid
State New
Headers
Series arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Make pazquel360's touchscreen work |

Commit Message

Doug Anderson Dec. 8, 2022, 7:20 p.m. UTC 
  In general, the timing diagrams for components specify a minimum time
for power cycling the component. When we remove power from a device we
need to let the device fully discharge and get to a quiescent state
before applying power again. If we power a device on too soon then it
might not have fully powered off and might be in a weird in-between /
invalid state.

eDP panels typically have a time that's at least 500 ms here. You can
see that in Linux's panel-edp driver that nearly every device
specifies a "unprepare" time of at least 500 ms. This is a common
minimum and the 500 ms is even in the example in the eDP spec.

In Linux, the "panel-edp" driver enforces this delay for its own
control of the regulator, but the "panel-edp" driver can't do anything
about other control of the regulator (for instance, by the touchpanel
driver).

Let's add 500 ms as a board constraint for the regulator that's used
for eDP/touchpanel on trogdor boards. If a given trogdor board stuffs
only panels that can use a shorter time or stuff some panels that need
a larger time then they can manually adjust this timing.

We'll only do this minimum delay for trogdor devices with eDP (ones
that use either bridge chip), not for devices with MIPI panels. MIPI
panels could have similar constraints but the 500 ms isn't necessarily
as standard and there are no known cases where this delay is needed.

For most trogdor boards, this doesn't actually seem to affect anything
when testing against shipping Linux. However, with pazqel360 it seems
that this does make a difference. It seems that the touchscreen on
this board _also_ needs some time for the regulator to discharge. That
time is much less than 500 ms, so we'll just put the eDP panel 500 ms
in there since the board constraint should be the "max" of the
components.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---

 .../boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-parade-ps8640.dtsi  | 12 ++++++++++++
 .../boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi   | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthias Kaehlcke Dec. 8, 2022, 11:31 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:20:03AM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In general, the timing diagrams for components specify a minimum time
> for power cycling the component. When we remove power from a device we
> need to let the device fully discharge and get to a quiescent state
> before applying power again. If we power a device on too soon then it
> might not have fully powered off and might be in a weird in-between /
> invalid state.
> 
> eDP panels typically have a time that's at least 500 ms here. You can
> see that in Linux's panel-edp driver that nearly every device

nit: s/that nearly/nearly/

no need to re-spin just for this.

> specifies a "unprepare" time of at least 500 ms. This is a common
> minimum and the 500 ms is even in the example in the eDP spec.
> 
> In Linux, the "panel-edp" driver enforces this delay for its own
> control of the regulator, but the "panel-edp" driver can't do anything
> about other control of the regulator (for instance, by the touchpanel
> driver).
> 
> Let's add 500 ms as a board constraint for the regulator that's used
> for eDP/touchpanel on trogdor boards. If a given trogdor board stuffs
> only panels that can use a shorter time or stuff some panels that need
> a larger time then they can manually adjust this timing.
> 
> We'll only do this minimum delay for trogdor devices with eDP (ones
> that use either bridge chip), not for devices with MIPI panels. MIPI
> panels could have similar constraints but the 500 ms isn't necessarily
> as standard and there are no known cases where this delay is needed.
> 
> For most trogdor boards, this doesn't actually seem to affect anything
> when testing against shipping Linux. However, with pazqel360 it seems
> that this does make a difference. It seems that the touchscreen on
> this board _also_ needs some time for the regulator to discharge. That
> time is much less than 500 ms, so we'll just put the eDP panel 500 ms
> in there since the board constraint should be the "max" of the
> components.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-parade-ps8640.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-parade-ps8640.dtsi
index ebd6765e2afa..e27a769f8cd4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-parade-ps8640.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-parade-ps8640.dtsi
@@ -26,6 +26,18 @@  pp3300_brij_ps8640: pp3300-brij-ps8640-regulator {
 	};
 };
 
+/*
+ * ADDITIONS TO FIXED REGULATORS DEFINED IN PARENT DEVICE TREE FILES
+ *
+ * Sort order matches the order in the parent files (parents before children).
+ */
+
+&pp3300_dx_edp {
+	off-on-delay-us = <500000>;
+};
+
+/* ADDITIONS TO NODES DEFINED IN PARENT DEVICE TREE FILES */
+
 &dsi0_out {
 	remote-endpoint = <&ps8640_in>;
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
index 65333709e529..3188788306d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
@@ -7,6 +7,18 @@ 
 
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
 
+/*
+ * ADDITIONS TO FIXED REGULATORS DEFINED IN PARENT DEVICE TREE FILES
+ *
+ * Sort order matches the order in the parent files (parents before children).
+ */
+
+&pp3300_dx_edp {
+	off-on-delay-us = <500000>;
+};
+
+/* ADDITIONS TO NODES DEFINED IN PARENT DEVICE TREE FILES */
+
 &dsi0_out {
 	remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>;
 };