Message ID | 20221206144134.1919987-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:f944:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id q4csp2860630wrr; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 06:44:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4HksF5bMsNCbpvNVQI7s/Pud9L1767tCv6Ys+pips3j3TSJYWZo9dHyP3ox7EoCYow04jz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:c6:b0:468:3d69:ace0 with SMTP id i6-20020a05640200c600b004683d69ace0mr59865926edu.356.1670337866869; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670337866; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WQUY3JbT7i1/utRIEltGizdzN2Axd3bSCTpuLQRTleuuEHlC4FvfgY2rN6cfgs2bku gP6IqengpATX7RGwIhym+dLOvuvJUA6XGs/pPbYyQpaA+prBGlrOSau+HbFJpsW3ugGs NtObWNdmvm0YxZZTnOJE//C4xZLQezhuODoCpn+4y+Px5rRfHv8gLNJPS2YZkN/dDcAE gxzBH3EiwkWWPS/qEb16j8pDQ9olejk8rOevgON5/LaaGODntwHTz3FGCrFDX9nehfw4 d0gu8WF5DpPnvwQDz0xc+7o8C+M4JKu6T7Q9/EEdgSknknOAstzzPj6RiFt24VTpilx7 1cyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=MZjuhydaWjaCc2DbgQJo0Oro4CLgOFmLK703uUtNmqU=; b=MHelkpcjI0rmMITZy6rCMmO28kzqVJey3hqzA1wPCV2KZEAhGTJ1tRtQPKMwz8KI3n CwJADZbKr8p9ebtupthJAg19BNK86EHZoVset+HosiRDy0R+i/6lpRCo5pUCvbaCdFQ2 /QLw5etTKtdULoHF6TsMrDxzJVhNzB5CHatiJkAeGvW/p9Ex3DLKu1MTF+a/GLzfjhx3 1XqxSZuVD/V5cwJzQtsHnCvukoF/us3S54JyHOkXqLVZABCXf62WDjyhHom1j50bX1aO 3FE6BuPerZ66SXOcAEDU/7Q5bCi3N/cFFXN85JOUnZLybTWEbOzbDeonk5uJIVcDrLk8 4Giw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qk11-20020a1709077f8b00b0078dad659776si13592544ejc.320.2022.12.06.06.43.37; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234927AbiLFOU5 (ORCPT <rfc822;jaysivo@gmail.com> + 99 others); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:20:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33314 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234910AbiLFOUs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:20:48 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D7182DA93; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 06:20:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NRMyX6KV9z4f3v58; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 22:20:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgD37ay2T49jumSkBg--.19656S4; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 22:20:39 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com> To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>, syzbot+4faa160fa96bfba639f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix kernel BUG in 'ext4_write_inline_data_end()' Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 22:41:34 +0800 Message-Id: <20221206144134.1919987-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgD37ay2T49jumSkBg--.19656S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxXF48ZF4xurWUWw48uF18AFb_yoWrtw1rpr Z8Gr1UGr4Iva4DCFWkAF1UZr1Uuwn8CF47WryIgr4kXa43Cw1UKF1FgF18J3WjyrZ2vrWY qF4DCry8Kw15G3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUgEb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x 0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG 6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFV Cjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCj c4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4 CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1x MIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJV Cq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIY CTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUrR6zUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1751476199424692264?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1751476199424692264?= |
Series |
[v2] ext4: fix kernel BUG in 'ext4_write_inline_data_end()'
|
|
Commit Message
Ye Bin
Dec. 6, 2022, 2:41 p.m. UTC
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Syzbot report follow issue: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inline.c:227! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 3629 Comm: syz-executor212 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-syzkaller-00018-g59d0d52c30d4 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 RIP: 0010:ext4_write_inline_data+0x344/0x3e0 fs/ext4/inline.c:227 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003b3f368 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880704e16c0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff888021763a80 RSI: ffffffff821e31a4 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 000000000006818e R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000068199 R10: 0000000000000079 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000000b R13: 0000000000068199 R14: ffffc90003b3f408 R15: ffff8880704e1c82 FS: 000055555723e3c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fffe8ac9080 CR3: 0000000079f81000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_write_inline_data_end+0x2a3/0x12f0 fs/ext4/inline.c:768 ext4_write_end+0x242/0xdd0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1313 ext4_da_write_end+0x3ed/0xa30 fs/ext4/inode.c:3063 generic_perform_write+0x316/0x570 mm/filemap.c:3764 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x15b/0x460 fs/ext4/file.c:285 ext4_file_write_iter+0x8bc/0x16e0 fs/ext4/file.c:700 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2191 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20b/0x3b0 fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write+0x182/0x700 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x74/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x745/0xc90 fs/splice.c:686 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:764 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x114/0x180 fs/splice.c:931 splice_direct_to_actor+0x335/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:886 do_splice_direct+0x1ab/0x280 fs/splice.c:974 do_sendfile+0xb19/0x1270 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1d0/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Above issue may happens as follows: ext4_da_write_begin ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA); ext4_da_write_end ext4_run_li_request ext4_mb_prefetch ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait ext4_validate_block_bitmap ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, block_group, EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT) percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter,grp->bb_free); -> sbi->s_freeclusters_counter become zero ext4_da_write_begin if (ext4_nonda_switch(inode->i_sb)) -> As freeclusters_counter is zero will return true *fsdata = (void *)FALL_BACK_TO_NONDELALLOC; ext4_write_begin ext4_da_write_end if (write_mode == FALL_BACK_TO_NONDELALLOC) ext4_write_end if (inline_data) ext4_write_inline_data_end ext4_write_inline_data BUG_ON(pos + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_size); -> As inode is already convert to extent, so 'pos + len' > inline_size -> then trigger BUG. To solve above issue, there's need to judge inode if has EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag in 'ext4_write_end()'. 'ext4_has_inline_data()' flag only cleared after do write back, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA flag indicate that inode has inline data, so add this flag check except 'ext4_has_inline_data()' flag in 'ext4_write_end()'. Fixes:f19d5870cbf7("ext4: add normal write support for inline data") Reported-by: syzbot+4faa160fa96bfba639f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Hi Bin, Thanks for the patch! The bug is reproduced with this patch. I can help trigger another test when you have new patch. https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=16760797880000 Regards, Jun
On 2022/12/7 14:44, Jun Nie wrote: > Hi Bin, > > Thanks for the patch! The bug is reproduced with this patch. I can > help trigger another > test when you have new patch. > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=16760797880000 The cause of this issue is different from that of the previous issue. I analyze that the issue "https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=16760797880000 " is caused by the concurrency of inline data conversion and buffer write. To be honest, I haven't thought of any good solution. > > Regards, > Jun > .
yebin (H) <yebin10@huawei.com> 于2022年12月7日周三 15:54写道: > > > > On 2022/12/7 14:44, Jun Nie wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > > > Thanks for the patch! The bug is reproduced with this patch. I can > > help trigger another > > test when you have new patch. > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=16760797880000 > > The cause of this issue is different from that of the previous issue. > I analyze that the issue > "https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=16760797880000 " > is caused by the concurrency of inline data conversion and buffer > write. To be honest, I haven't > thought of any good solution. > Thanks for explanation. So the patch to fix the previous bug is still in upstream plan, right? > > > > Regards, > > Jun > > . >
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index f0079835b8a8..25841a878ce9 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -1315,7 +1315,8 @@ static int ext4_write_end(struct file *file, trace_ext4_write_end(inode, pos, len, copied); - if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) + if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode) && + ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA)) return ext4_write_inline_data_end(inode, pos, len, copied, page); copied = block_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied, page, fsdata);