tree-optimization/106422 - verify block copying in forward threading
Commit Message
The forward threader failed to check whether it can actually duplicate
blocks. The following adds this in a similar place the backwards threader
performs this check.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
PR tree-optimization/106422
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.cc (fwd_jt_path_registry::update_cfg):
Check whether we can copy thread blocks and cancel the thread if not.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr106422.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr106422.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.cc | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr106422.c
Comments
On 7/29/2022 2:47 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The forward threader failed to check whether it can actually duplicate
> blocks. The following adds this in a similar place the backwards threader
> performs this check.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
>
> PR tree-optimization/106422
> * tree-ssa-threadupdate.cc (fwd_jt_path_registry::update_cfg):
> Check whether we can copy thread blocks and cancel the thread if not.
>
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr106422.c: New testcase.
I'm back from PTO. This looks obviously correct to me.
jeff
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+void vfork() __attribute__((__leaf__));
+void semanage_reload_policy(char *arg, void cb(void))
+{
+ if (!arg)
+ {
+ cb();
+ return;
+ }
+ vfork();
+ if (arg)
+ __builtin_free(arg);
+}
@@ -2678,7 +2678,9 @@ fwd_jt_path_registry::update_cfg (bool may_peel_loop_headers)
for (j = 0; j < path->length (); j++)
{
edge e = (*path)[j]->e;
- if (m_removed_edges->find_slot (e, NO_INSERT))
+ if (m_removed_edges->find_slot (e, NO_INSERT)
+ || ((*path)[j]->type == EDGE_COPY_SRC_BLOCK
+ && !can_duplicate_block_p (e->src)))
break;
}