Message ID | 20221201145923.73028-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:f944:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id q4csp304190wrr; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 06:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6wvOicS6oONRu+FXd96UbNhsC4WiO/n9Fa7ibJmNBfX39/T9mNT49H09lViGYgyb+GbIi5 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:206b:b0:46a:d5ed:e066 with SMTP id bd11-20020a056402206b00b0046ad5ede066mr26249465edb.335.1669906424593; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:53:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669906424; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MXmFPKmkUXiz/Im4ZUbxvWh23T9w1wOB35qIhTd+RJ4ya0WrCB5AEhKXiOQyntroB5 PmK900M8QIWqmRYaUMqXnMVicREWQ036foVHafOy/jq6YPh7Lm8npFyOZ8tPVlpcX+CC 9wpNX4gc9cu6dMSLQ4JzAnrT/7t3/Tw5UKIpc6oKd4SpYznDUkvEQB3zafr4tCse+caC N9Ov7twD8TIsWy8JurPqTvnJUA+2P7yGnwDd32a7eZIfmj0NOu6684lMIfCNs7K40zz2 p1Y2Eshb7nODhdXDrmbs4uFJoKiJzVZZXwYdjmmw5wAeLSwUsBt7QR/Sa5CqvyX316lM 0npQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Qo77sBfj8iUq8Tk44SO9TEA6GigWY2pByZP3cXDYUgc=; b=qFZ0xe1w3t6bb8f7e8WVqKTZ7dZJV7uyyA1TgZaC2hb9j0RAmASQEJ52RPVvqWMOf7 4NzoltpJv1tkB4Nw6DaZMAQ/5pPashcm7qZJN7hRWX3mzL0MGENy6BZPy+cNmek5r4HQ /Z8fRvfrW9XoAiho6rgF75SmD8bklvEU2KPjIp5p3ZBPn9EWDG53hZeNi7FB54+zdFzI yKBawG0yziurUXF+xbJWj52hHk+ZkXZJz87o9u9blgUk1PbISzmdkLQXe9dZlfnuu0me eJyxJERbB9yHZiOqjnV4xs0pcwJeRrnZAlwa6PI+WV/hSiQ1hbKHna5+f+/MOpsGDdRj qBZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hw8-20020a170907a0c800b0078049ab4bbasi497930ejc.526.2022.12.01.06.53.19; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:53:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231806AbiLAOia (ORCPT <rfc822;heyuhang3455@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:38:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230471AbiLAOi1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:38:27 -0500 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755BFA6040; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 06:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NNJbH3JyGz4f3m7k; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:38:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAnmdZcvIhjVMXmBQ--.22010S4; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 22:38:22 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com> To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>, syzbot+4d99a966fd74bdeeec36@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:59:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20221201145923.73028-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAnmdZcvIhjVMXmBQ--.22010S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGrW3JFy5KrWkJr4rZr4kXrb_yoWrZF1Up3 yayry8Cr48WryUCF48Cr1UJ34DWwn3CF4UJrW7Wr4xZFy7Xw1xKFyDKF43ZFy8tFW8Jr9F qF4Dtw10gr15G3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUgEb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x 0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG 6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFV Cjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCj c4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4 CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1x MIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJV Cq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIY CTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUrR6zUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1751023799050939720?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1751023799050939720?= |
Series |
[v2] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea
|
|
Commit Message
Ye Bin
Dec. 1, 2022, 2:59 p.m. UTC
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Syzbot found the following issue: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 at mm/page_alloc.c:5534 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor261 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ccf080 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffc90003ccf0e0 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003ccf108 RBP: ffffc90003ccf198 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003ccf0e0 R10: fffff52000799e21 R11: 1ffff92000799e1c R12: 0000000000040c40 R13: 1ffff92000799e18 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000799e14 FS: 0000555555c10300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffc36f70000 CR3: 00000000744ad000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:223 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:246 [inline] __kmalloc_large_node+0x8a/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:1096 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:943 [inline] __kmalloc+0xfe/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:968 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:558 [inline] ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2558 [inline] ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2673 [inline] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe3f/0x1cd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2765 __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x2b8/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5857 ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5900 [inline] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x51a/0x670 fs/ext4/inode.c:5978 ext4_inline_data_truncate+0x548/0xd00 fs/ext4/inline.c:2021 ext4_truncate+0x341/0xeb0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4221 ext4_process_orphan+0x1aa/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:339 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5515 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x80ed/0x8610 fs/ext4/super.c:5643 get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1324 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531 do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd </TASK> Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc can allocate maxium size memory is 4M. XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)', so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'. To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc() to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block(). Reported-by: syzbot+4d99a966fd74bdeeec36@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 54dd0e0a1b25 ("ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu 01-12-22 22:59:23, Ye Bin wrote: > From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > > Syzbot found the following issue: > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3631 at mm/page_alloc.c:5534 __alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 1 PID: 3631 Comm: syz-executor261 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00308-g644e9524388a #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 > RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x30a/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:5534 > RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ccf080 EFLAGS: 00010246 > RAX: ffffc90003ccf0e0 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 0000000000000000 > RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc90003ccf108 > RBP: ffffc90003ccf198 R08: dffffc0000000000 R09: ffffc90003ccf0e0 > R10: fffff52000799e21 R11: 1ffff92000799e1c R12: 0000000000040c40 > R13: 1ffff92000799e18 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 1ffff92000799e14 > FS: 0000555555c10300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007ffc36f70000 CR3: 00000000744ad000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:223 [inline] > alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:246 [inline] > __kmalloc_large_node+0x8a/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:1096 > __do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:943 [inline] > __kmalloc+0xfe/0x1a0 mm/slab_common.c:968 > kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:558 [inline] > ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2558 [inline] > ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2673 [inline] > ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe3f/0x1cd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2765 > __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x2b8/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5857 > ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5900 [inline] > __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x51a/0x670 fs/ext4/inode.c:5978 > ext4_inline_data_truncate+0x548/0xd00 fs/ext4/inline.c:2021 > ext4_truncate+0x341/0xeb0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4221 > ext4_process_orphan+0x1aa/0x2d0 fs/ext4/orphan.c:339 > ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 > __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5515 [inline] > ext4_fill_super+0x80ed/0x8610 fs/ext4/super.c:5643 > get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1324 > vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1531 > do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3040 > do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline] > __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline] > __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3568 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd > </TASK> > > Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc > can allocate maxium size memory is 4M. > XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)', > so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger > warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'. > To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc() > to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block(). > > Reported-by: syzbot+4d99a966fd74bdeeec36@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Fixes: 54dd0e0a1b25 ("ext4: add extra checks to ext4_xattr_block_get()") > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Thanks! The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/xattr.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > index 718ef3987f94..23cfefc6d262 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > @@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_move_to_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > > is = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ext4_xattr_ibody_find), GFP_NOFS); > bs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ext4_xattr_block_find), GFP_NOFS); > - buffer = kmalloc(value_size, GFP_NOFS); > + buffer = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_NOFS); > b_entry_name = kmalloc(entry->e_name_len + 1, GFP_NOFS); > if (!is || !bs || !buffer || !b_entry_name) { > error = -ENOMEM; > @@ -2608,7 +2608,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_move_to_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > error = 0; > out: > kfree(b_entry_name); > - kfree(buffer); > + kvfree(buffer); > if (is) > brelse(is->iloc.bh); > if (bs) > -- > 2.31.1 >
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:59:23PM +0800, Ye Bin wrote: > > Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc > can allocate maxium size memory is 4M. > XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)', > so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger > warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'. > To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc() > to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block(). See my comment to the v1 version of the patch. I suspect the real problem is that the e_value_size is completely bogus, and we should have checked it much earlier in the stack call trace, via a call to xattr_check_inode(). Cheers, - Ted
On 2022/12/2 0:00, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:59:23PM +0800, Ye Bin wrote: >> Reason is allocate 16M memory by kmalloc, but MAX_ORDER is 11, kmalloc >> can allocate maxium size memory is 4M. >> XATTR_SIZE_MAX is currently 64k, but EXT4_XATTR_SIZE_MAX is '(1 << 24)', >> so 'ext4_xattr_check_entries()' regards this length as legal. Then trigger >> warning in 'ext4_xattr_move_to_block()'. >> To solve above issue, according to Jan Kara's suggestion use kvmalloc() >> to allocate memory in ext4_xattr_move_to_block(). > See my comment to the v1 version of the patch. I suspect the real > problem is that the e_value_size is completely bogus, and we should > have checked it much earlier in the stack call trace, via a call to > xattr_check_inode(). Yes, Not only the e_value_size is wrong, but also the inode is wrong: EXT4-fs: Ignoring removed nobh option EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_xattr_inode_iget:389: comm rep: inode #1: comm rep: iget: illegal inode # EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_xattr_inode_iget:392: comm rep: error while reading EA inode 1 err=-117 EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea:2788: Unable to expand inode 15. Delete some EAs or run e2fsck. Maybe we can do follow check in ext4_xattr_check_entries() when "entry->e_value_inum != 0". ··· err = ext4_xattr_inode_iget(inode, le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_inum), le32_to_cpu(entry->e_hash), &ea_inode); if (err) { ea_inode = NULL; goto out; } if (i_size_read(ea_inode) != size) { ext4_warning_inode(ea_inode, "ea_inode file size=%llu entry size=%zu", i_size_read(ea_inode), size); err = -EFSCORRUPTED; goto out; } ··· > > Cheers, > > - Ted > > . >
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c index 718ef3987f94..23cfefc6d262 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_move_to_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, is = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ext4_xattr_ibody_find), GFP_NOFS); bs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ext4_xattr_block_find), GFP_NOFS); - buffer = kmalloc(value_size, GFP_NOFS); + buffer = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_NOFS); b_entry_name = kmalloc(entry->e_name_len + 1, GFP_NOFS); if (!is || !bs || !buffer || !b_entry_name) { error = -ENOMEM; @@ -2608,7 +2608,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_move_to_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, error = 0; out: kfree(b_entry_name); - kfree(buffer); + kvfree(buffer); if (is) brelse(is->iloc.bh); if (bs)