diff mbox series

[v2,2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing

Message ID 20240207011520.3128382-3-jm@ti.com
State New
Headers
Series Add tuning algorithm for delay chain |

Commit Message

Judith Mendez Feb. 7, 2024, 1:15 a.m. UTC 
  For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.

Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
---
Changelog:
v1->v2:
- Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
 instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Andrew Davis Feb. 12, 2024, 5:13 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 2/6/24 7:15 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
> 
> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>   instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

See how much easier this patch is this way :)

Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>   
>   	if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>   		sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
> +		sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>   		sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>   	} else {
>   		sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
Judith Mendez Feb. 12, 2024, 5:33 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Andrew,

On 2/12/24 11:13 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 2/6/24 7:15 PM, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>
>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed 
>> modes")
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>   instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> See how much easier this patch is this way :)

Thanks for your review. :D It does look simpler.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c 
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct 
>> sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>       if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>           sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>> +        sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, 
>> sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>           sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>       } else {
>>           sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
Adrian Hunter Feb. 16, 2024, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
> 
> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")

Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
than the patch order i.e.

Patch	Fixes		in version
1 	13ebeae68ac9 	v5.10-rc1
2 	a161c45f2979 	v5.7-rc1
3 	8ee5fc0e0b3b 	v5.7-rc1
4 	8ee5fc0e0b3b 	v5.7-rc1
4 	a0a62497f6aa 	v5.10-rc1
5 	fe52e2fbc6ef 	v5.9-rc1
6 	1accbced1c32 	v5.3-rc1
7 	a161c45f2979 	v5.7-rc1

That might make backporting these patches more challenging.

> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>  instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>  
>  	if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>  		sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
> +		sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>  		sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>  	} else {
>  		sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
Judith Mendez Feb. 20, 2024, 9:05 p.m. UTC | #4 
Hi Adrian,

On 2/16/24 11:09 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>
>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
> 
> Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
> than the patch order i.e.
> 
> Patch	Fixes		in version
> 1 	13ebeae68ac9 	v5.10-rc1
> 2 	a161c45f2979 	v5.7-rc1
> 3 	8ee5fc0e0b3b 	v5.7-rc1
> 4 	8ee5fc0e0b3b 	v5.7-rc1
> 4 	a0a62497f6aa 	v5.10-rc1
> 5 	fe52e2fbc6ef 	v5.9-rc1
> 6 	1accbced1c32 	v5.3-rc1
> 7 	a161c45f2979 	v5.7-rc1
> 
> That might make backporting these patches more challenging.

Are you suggesting to remove the fixes tag here?

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>   instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>   
>>   	if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>   		sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>> +		sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>   		sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>   	} else {
>>   		sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
> 

~ Judith
Adrian Hunter Feb. 28, 2024, 1:21 p.m. UTC | #5 
On 20/02/24 23:05, Judith Mendez wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On 2/16/24 11:09 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
>>
>> Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
>> than the patch order i.e.
>>
>> Patch    Fixes        in version
>> 1     13ebeae68ac9     v5.10-rc1
>> 2     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>> 3     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>> 4     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>> 4     a0a62497f6aa     v5.10-rc1
>> 5     fe52e2fbc6ef     v5.9-rc1
>> 6     1accbced1c32     v5.3-rc1
>> 7     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>>
>> That might make backporting these patches more challenging.
> 
> Are you suggesting to remove the fixes tag here?

No, it is just something to think about if you intend to
backport these patches to older kernels.

> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v1->v2:
>>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>>   instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>         if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>>           sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>>> +        sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>>           sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>>       } else {
>>>           sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
>>
> 
> ~ Judith
Judith Mendez Feb. 28, 2024, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #6 
Hi Adrian,

On 2/28/24 7:21 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 20/02/24 23:05, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> On 2/16/24 11:09 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>>>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>>>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
>>>
>>> Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
>>> than the patch order i.e.
>>>
>>> Patch    Fixes        in version
>>> 1     13ebeae68ac9     v5.10-rc1
>>> 2     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>>> 3     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>>> 4     8ee5fc0e0b3b     v5.7-rc1
>>> 4     a0a62497f6aa     v5.10-rc1
>>> 5     fe52e2fbc6ef     v5.9-rc1
>>> 6     1accbced1c32     v5.3-rc1
>>> 7     a161c45f2979     v5.7-rc1
>>>
>>> That might make backporting these patches more challenging.
>>
>> Are you suggesting to remove the fixes tag here?
> 
> No, it is just something to think about if you intend to
> backport these patches to older kernels.

Thanks, Ill keep this in mind for v3.

> 
>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>>>    instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>>          if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>>>            sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>>>> +        sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>>>            sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>>>        } else {
>>>>            sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
>>>
>>
>> ~ Judith
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@  static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
 
 	if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
 		sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
+		sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
 		sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
 	} else {
 		sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);