drm/i915: Add missing ; to __assign_str() macros in tracepoint code

Message ID 20240222133057.2af72a19@gandalf.local.home
State New
Headers
Series drm/i915: Add missing ; to __assign_str() macros in tracepoint code |

Commit Message

Steven Rostedt Feb. 22, 2024, 6:30 p.m. UTC
  From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

I'm working on improving the __assign_str() and __string() macros to be
more efficient, and removed some unneeded semicolons. This triggered a bug
in the build as some of the __assign_str() macros in intel_display_trace
was missing a terminating semicolon.

Fixes: 2ceea5d88048b ("drm/i915: Print plane name in fbc tracepoints")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Ville Syrjälä Feb. 22, 2024, 6:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> I'm working on improving the __assign_str() and __string() macros to be
> more efficient, and removed some unneeded semicolons. This triggered a bug
> in the build as some of the __assign_str() macros in intel_display_trace
> was missing a terminating semicolon.
> 
> Fixes: 2ceea5d88048b ("drm/i915: Print plane name in fbc tracepoints")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Do you want me to apply this to drm-intel or do you want to take
it through some other tree? Either way seems fine for this stuff.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> index 99bdb833591c..7862e7cefe02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
> @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_activate,
>  			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
>  									 plane->pipe);
>  			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
> -			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
> +			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
>  			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
>  			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_deactivate,
>  			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
>  									 plane->pipe);
>  			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
> -			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
> +			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
>  			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
>  			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_nuke,
>  			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
>  									 plane->pipe);
>  			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
> -			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
> +			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
>  			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
>  			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
  
Steven Rostedt Feb. 22, 2024, 6:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:30:57 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> I'm working on improving the __assign_str() and __string() macros to be
> more efficient, and removed some unneeded semicolons. This triggered a bug
> in the build as some of the __assign_str() macros in intel_display_trace
> was missing a terminating semicolon.
> 
> Fixes: 2ceea5d88048b ("drm/i915: Print plane name in fbc tracepoints")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---

Note, I have patches that depend on this fix, so if one of the maintainers
would like to just give me an "Acked-by", I'll take it through my tree. I
doubt it will have any conflicts, unless you are planning on changing the
given effected events.

-- Steve
  
Steven Rostedt Feb. 22, 2024, 6:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:42:59 +0200
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > 
> > I'm working on improving the __assign_str() and __string() macros to be
> > more efficient, and removed some unneeded semicolons. This triggered a bug
> > in the build as some of the __assign_str() macros in intel_display_trace
> > was missing a terminating semicolon.
> > 
> > Fixes: 2ceea5d88048b ("drm/i915: Print plane name in fbc tracepoints")
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Do you want me to apply this to drm-intel or do you want to take
> it through some other tree? Either way seems fine for this stuff.

Thanks. I would like to add it to my tree as my changes rely on it.

But I think to do that, I still need an Acked-by from one of the
maintainers listed in the MAINTAINERS file.

-- Steve
  
Rodrigo Vivi Feb. 22, 2024, 7:04 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 01:43:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:30:57 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > 
> > I'm working on improving the __assign_str() and __string() macros to be
> > more efficient, and removed some unneeded semicolons. This triggered a bug
> > in the build as some of the __assign_str() macros in intel_display_trace
> > was missing a terminating semicolon.
> > 
> > Fixes: 2ceea5d88048b ("drm/i915: Print plane name in fbc tracepoints")
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> 
> Note, I have patches that depend on this fix, so if one of the maintainers
> would like to just give me an "Acked-by", I'll take it through my tree. I
> doubt it will have any conflicts, unless you are planning on changing the
> given effected events.

since it is not breaking builds on our side and the conflicts, if any, would
be minimal, feel free to take this trough your tree

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> 
> -- Steve
  
Steven Rostedt Feb. 22, 2024, 7:27 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:04:20 -0500
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:

> > Note, I have patches that depend on this fix, so if one of the maintainers
> > would like to just give me an "Acked-by", I'll take it through my tree. I
> > doubt it will have any conflicts, unless you are planning on changing the
> > given effected events.  
> 
> since it is not breaking builds on our side and the conflicts, if any, would
> be minimal, feel free to take this trough your tree
> 
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Thanks, much appreciated!

-- Steve
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
index 99bdb833591c..7862e7cefe02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@  TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_activate,
 			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
 									 plane->pipe);
 			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
-			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
+			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
 			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
 			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
 			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@  TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_deactivate,
 			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
 									 plane->pipe);
 			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
-			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
+			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
 			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
 			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
 			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@  TRACE_EVENT(intel_fbc_nuke,
 			   struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(to_i915(plane->base.dev),
 									 plane->pipe);
 			   __assign_str(dev, __dev_name_kms(plane));
-			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name)
+			   __assign_str(name, plane->base.name);
 			   __entry->pipe = crtc->pipe;
 			   __entry->frame = intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter(crtc);
 			   __entry->scanline = intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);