[v4,3/4] dt-bindings: Add post-init-providers property
Commit Message
The post-init-providers property can be used to break a dependency cycle by
marking some provider(s) as a post device initialization provider(s). This
allows an OS to do a better job at ordering initialization and
suspend/resume of the devices in a dependency cycle.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
.../bindings/post-init-providers.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 13 ++-
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.yaml
Comments
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:46:21 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> The post-init-providers property can be used to break a dependency cycle by
> marking some provider(s) as a post device initialization provider(s). This
> allows an OS to do a better job at ordering initialization and
> suspend/resume of the devices in a dependency cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/post-init-providers.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 13 ++-
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.yaml
>
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@1000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-gcc', 'vendor,soc1-gcc']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@1000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-gcc', 'vendor,soc1-gcc']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@2000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-dispcc', 'vendor,soc1-dispcc']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.example.dtb: /example-0/clock-controller@2000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['vendor,soc4-dispcc', 'vendor,soc1-dispcc']
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240222034624.2970024-4-saravanak@google.com
The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (c) 2020, Google LLC. All rights reserved.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/post-init-providers.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Post device initialization providers
+
+maintainers:
+ - Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
+
+description: |
+ This property is used to indicate that the device(s) pointed to by the
+ property are not needed for the initialization of the device that lists this
+ property. This property does not make a device (that's previously not a
+ provider) into a provider. It simply downgrades an existing provider to a
+ post device initialization provider.
+
+ A device can list its providers in devicetree using one or more of the
+ standard devicetree bindings. By default, it is assumed that the provider
+ device can be initialized before the consumer device is initialized.
+
+ However, that assumption cannot be made when there are cyclic dependencies
+ between devices. Since each device is a provider (directly or indirectly) of
+ the others in the cycle, there is no guaranteed safe order for initializing
+ the devices in a cycle. We can try to initialize them in an arbitrary order
+ and eventually successfully initialize all of them, but that doesn't always
+ work well.
+
+ For example, say,
+ * The device tree has the following cyclic dependency X -> Y -> Z -> X (where
+ -> denotes "depends on").
+ * But X is not needed to fully initialize Z (X might be needed only when a
+ specific functionality is requested post initialization).
+
+ If all the other -> are mandatory initialization dependencies, then trying to
+ initialize the devices in a loop (or arbitrarily) will always eventually end
+ up with the devices being initialized in the order Z, Y and X.
+
+ However, if Y is an optional provider for X (where X provides limited
+ functionality when Y is not initialized and providing its services), then
+ trying to initialize the devices in a loop (or arbitrarily) could end up with
+ the devices being initialized in the following order:
+
+ * Z, Y and X - All devices provide full functionality
+ * Z, X and Y - X provides partial functionality
+ * X, Z and Y - X provides partial functionality
+
+ However, we always want to initialize the devices in the order Z, Y and X
+ since that provides the full functionality without interruptions.
+
+ One alternate option that might be suggested is to have the driver for X
+ notice that Y became available at a later point and adjust the functionality
+ it provides. However, other userspace applications could have started using X
+ with the limited functionality before Y was available and it might not be
+ possible to transparently transition X or the users of X to full
+ functionality while X is in use.
+
+ Similarly, when it comes to suspend (resume) ordering, it's unclear which
+ device in a dependency cycle needs to be suspended/resumed first and trying
+ arbitrary orders can result in system crashes or instability.
+
+ Explicitly calling out which link in a cycle needs to be broken when
+ determining the order, simplifies things a lot, improves efficiency, makes
+ the behavior more deterministic and maximizes the functionality that can be
+ provided without interruption.
+
+ This property is used to provide this additional information between devices
+ in a cycle by telling which provider(s) is not needed for initializing the
+ device that lists this property.
+
+ In the example above, Z would list X as a post-init-providers and the
+ initialization dependency would become X -> Y -> Z -/-> X. So the best order
+ to initialize them becomes clear: Z, Y and then X.
+
+select: true
+
+properties:
+ post-init-providers:
+ # One or more providers can be marked as post initialization provider
+ description:
+ List of phandles to providers that are not needed for initializing or
+ resuming this device.
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+ items:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ gcc: clock-controller@1000 {
+ compatible = "vendor,soc4-gcc", "vendor,soc1-gcc";
+ reg = <0x1000 0x80>;
+ clocks = <&dispcc 0x1>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ post-init-providers = <&dispcc>;
+ };
+ dispcc: clock-controller@2000 {
+ compatible = "vendor,soc4-dispcc", "vendor,soc1-dispcc";
+ reg = <0x2000 0x80>;
+ clocks = <&gcc 0xdd>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ };
@@ -6060,12 +6060,6 @@ S: Maintained
F: drivers/base/devcoredump.c
F: include/linux/devcoredump.h
-DEVICE DEPENDENCY HELPER SCRIPT
-M: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
-L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-S: Maintained
-F: scripts/dev-needs.sh
-
DEVICE DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)
M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
M: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
@@ -8300,6 +8294,13 @@ F: include/linux/firewire.h
F: include/uapi/linux/firewire*.h
F: tools/firewire/
+FIRMWARE DEVICE LINK (fw_devlink)
+M: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
+L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+S: Maintained
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/post-init-providers.yaml
+F: scripts/dev-needs.sh
+
FIRMWARE FRAMEWORK FOR ARMV8-A
M: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)