[08/10] selftests/sched: Migrate cs_prctl_test to kselfttest

  This test begs to be a kselftest, is in the kselftest hierarchy and does
not even use a single kselftest API. Convert it.

It simplifies some of the code and the output also looks much nicer now:

 Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile        |  6 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c | 74 ++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
  

On 2/16/24 13:31, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:

> This test begs to be a kselftest, is in the kselftest hierarchy and does
> not even use a single kselftest API. Convert it.
>
> It simplifies some of the code and the output also looks much nicer now:
>
>   Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

Reviewed-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>


> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile        |  6 +-
>   tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c | 74 ++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile
> index f491d741cb45..90c53bc1337e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/Makefile
> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
>   # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS := cs_dlserver_test
> -
> -cs_dlserver_test: cs_dlserver_test.c common.c
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += cs_prctl_test
>   
>   CFLAGS += $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
>   CFLAGS += -Wall
>   
>   include ../lib.mk
> +
> +$(OUTPUT)/cs_dlserver_test: cs_dlserver_test.c common.c
> +$(OUTPUT)/cs_prctl_test: cs_prctl_test.c common.c
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c
> index 7ba057154343..bb7aee703cdf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sched/cs_prctl_test.c
> @@ -28,10 +28,11 @@
>   #include <unistd.h>
>   #include <time.h>
>   #include <errno.h>
> -#include <stdio.h>
>   #include <stdlib.h>
>   #include <string.h>
>   
> +#include "common.h"
> +
>   #if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 30) == 0
>   #include <sys/syscall.h>
>   static pid_t gettid(void)
> @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ static int _prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3, unsigned l
>   	int res;
>   
>   	res = prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
> -	printf("%d = prctl(%d, %ld, %ld, %ld, %lx)\n", res, option, (long)arg2, (long)arg3,
> +	ksft_print_msg("%d = prctl(%d, %ld, %ld, %ld, %lx)\n", res, option, (long)arg2, (long)arg3,
>   	       (long)arg4, arg5);
>   	return res;
>   }
> @@ -91,21 +92,20 @@ static int _prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3, unsigned l
>   static void __handle_error(char *fn, int ln, char *msg)
>   {
>   	int pidx;
> -	printf("(%s:%d) - ", fn, ln);
> +	ksft_print_msg("(%s:%d) - ", fn, ln);
>   	perror(msg);
>   	if (need_cleanup) {
>   		for (pidx = 0; pidx < num_processes; ++pidx)
>   			kill(procs[pidx].cpid, 15);
>   		need_cleanup = 0;
>   	}
> -	exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +	ksft_exit_fail();
>   }
>   
>   static void handle_usage(int rc, char *msg)
>   {
> -	puts(USAGE);
> -	puts(msg);
> -	putchar('\n');
> +	ksft_print_msg("%s\n", USAGE);
> +	ksft_print_msg("%s\n\n", msg);
>   	exit(rc);
>   }
>   
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static unsigned long get_cs_cookie(int pid)
>   	ret = prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_GET, pid, PIDTYPE_PID,
>   		    (unsigned long)&cookie);
>   	if (ret) {
> -		printf("Not a core sched system\n");
> +		ksft_print_msg("Not a core sched system\n");
>   		return -1UL;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int child_func_process(void *arg)
>   
>   	ret = write(ca->pfd[1], &ca->thr_tids, sizeof(int) * ca->num_threads);
>   	if (ret == -1)
> -		printf("write failed on pfd[%d] - error (%s)\n",
> +		ksft_print_msg("write failed on pfd[%d] - error (%s)\n",
>   			ca->pfd[1], strerror(errno));
>   
>   	close(ca->pfd[1]);
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ void create_processes(int num_processes, int num_threads, struct child_args proc
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_processes; ++i) {
>   		ret = read(proc[i].pfd[0], &proc[i].thr_tids, sizeof(int) * proc[i].num_threads);
>   		if (ret == -1)
> -			printf("read failed on proc[%d].pfd[0] error (%s)\n",
> +			ksft_print_msg("read failed on proc[%d].pfd[0] error (%s)\n",
>   				i, strerror(errno));
>   		close(proc[i].pfd[0]);
>   	}
> @@ -202,30 +202,29 @@ void disp_processes(int num_processes, struct child_args proc[])
>   {
>   	int i, j;
>   
> -	printf("tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", gettid(), getpid(), getpgid(0),
> +	ksft_print_msg("tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", gettid(), getpid(), getpgid(0),
>   	       get_cs_cookie(getpid()));
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_processes; ++i) {
> -		printf("    tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", proc[i].cpid, proc[i].cpid,
> +		ksft_print_msg("    tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", proc[i].cpid, proc[i].cpid,
>   		       getpgid(proc[i].cpid), get_cs_cookie(proc[i].cpid));
>   		for (j = 0; j < proc[i].num_threads; ++j) {
> -			printf("        tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", proc[i].thr_tids[j],
> +			ksft_print_msg("        tid=%d, / tgid=%d / pgid=%d: %lx\n", proc[i].thr_tids[j],
>   			       proc[i].cpid, getpgid(0), get_cs_cookie(proc[i].thr_tids[j]));
>   		}
>   	}
>   	puts("\n");
>   }
>   
> -static int errors;
> -
>   #define validate(v) _validate(__LINE__, v, #v)
>   void _validate(int line, int val, char *msg)
>   {
>   	if (!val) {
> -		++errors;
> -		printf("(%d) FAILED: %s\n", line, msg);
> +		ksft_print_msg("(%d) FAILED: %s\n", line, msg);
> +		ksft_inc_fail_cnt();
>   	} else {
> -		printf("(%d) PASSED: %s\n", line, msg);
> +		ksft_print_msg("(%d) PASSED: %s\n", line, msg);
> +		ksft_inc_pass_cnt();
>   	}
>   }
>   
> @@ -254,13 +253,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   			keypress = 1;
>   			break;
>   		case 'h':
> -			printf(USAGE);
> +			ksft_print_msg(USAGE);
>   			exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
>   		default:
>   			handle_usage(20, "unknown option");
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!hyperthreading_enabled()) {
> +		ksft_exit_skip("This test requires hyperthreading to be enabled\n");
> +	}
> +
>   	if (num_processes < 1 || num_processes > MAX_PROCESSES)
>   		handle_usage(1, "Bad processes value");
>   
> @@ -272,17 +275,22 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   
>   	srand(time(NULL));
>   
> -	/* put into separate process group */
> +	/* Put into separate process group */
>   	if (setpgid(0, 0) != 0)
>   		handle_error("process group");
>   
> -	printf("\n## Create a thread/process/process group hiearchy\n");
> +	ksft_print_header();
> +
> +	/* Increase the count if adding more validate() statements. */
> +	ksft_set_plan(17);
> +
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Create a thread/process/process group hiearchy\n");
>   	create_processes(num_processes, num_threads, procs);
>   	need_cleanup = 1;
>   	disp_processes(num_processes, procs);
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(0) == 0);
>   
> -	printf("\n## Set a cookie on entire process group\n");
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Set a cookie on entire process group\n");
>   	if (_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 0) < 0)
>   		handle_error("core_sched create failed -- PGID");
>   	disp_processes(num_processes, procs);
> @@ -296,7 +304,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(0) == get_cs_cookie(pid));
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(0) == get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0]));
>   
> -	printf("\n## Set a new cookie on entire process/TGID [%d]\n", pid);
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Set a new cookie on entire process/TGID [%d]\n", pid);
>   	if (_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_CREATE, pid, PIDTYPE_TGID, 0) < 0)
>   		handle_error("core_sched create failed -- TGID");
>   	disp_processes(num_processes, procs);
> @@ -305,7 +313,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != 0);
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) == get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0]));
>   
> -	printf("\n## Copy the cookie of current/PGID[%d], to pid [%d] as PIDTYPE_PID\n",
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Copy the cookie of current/PGID[%d], to pid [%d] as PIDTYPE_PID\n",
>   	       getpid(), pid);
>   	if (_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, pid, PIDTYPE_PID, 0) < 0)
>   		handle_error("core_sched share to itself failed -- PID");
> @@ -315,7 +323,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != 0);
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0]));
>   
> -	printf("\n## Copy cookie from a thread [%d] to current/PGID [%d] as PIDTYPE_PID\n",
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Copy cookie from a thread [%d] to current/PGID [%d] as PIDTYPE_PID\n",
>   	       procs[pidx].thr_tids[0], getpid());
>   	if (_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_FROM, procs[pidx].thr_tids[0],
>   		   PIDTYPE_PID, 0) < 0)
> @@ -325,7 +333,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(0) == get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0]));
>   	validate(get_cs_cookie(pid) != get_cs_cookie(procs[pidx].thr_tids[0]));
>   
> -	printf("\n## Copy cookie from current [%d] to current as pidtype PGID\n", getpid());
> +	ksft_print_msg("\n## Copy cookie from current [%d] to current as pidtype PGID\n", getpid());
>   	if (_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 0) < 0)
>   		handle_error("core_sched share to self failed -- PGID");
>   	disp_processes(num_processes, procs);
> @@ -340,20 +348,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	validate(_prctl(PR_SCHED_CORE, PR_SCHED_CORE_SHARE_TO, 0, PIDTYPE_PGID, 1) < 0
>   		&& errno == EINVAL);
>   
> -	if (errors) {
> -		printf("TESTS FAILED. errors: %d\n", errors);
> -		res = 10;
> -	} else {
> -		printf("SUCCESS !!!\n");
> -	}
> -
> -	if (keypress)
> +	if (keypress) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Waiting for keypress to exit\n");
>   		getchar();
> -	else
> +	} else {
>   		sleep(delay);
> +	}
>   
>   	for (pidx = 0; pidx < num_processes; ++pidx)
>   		kill(procs[pidx].cpid, 15);
>   
> +	ksft_finished();
>   	return res;
>   }
  

On 2/16/24 12:18, Chris Hyser wrote:
> On 2/16/24 13:31, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> 
>> This test begs to be a kselftest, is in the kselftest hierarchy and does
>> not even use a single kselftest API. Convert it.
>>
>> It simplifies some of the code and the output also looks much nicer now:
>>
>>   Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
> 

Assuming this is going through sched tree,

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
  

On 2/20/2024 7:03 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/16/24 12:18, Chris Hyser wrote:
>> On 2/16/24 13:31, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>
>>> This test begs to be a kselftest, is in the kselftest hierarchy and does
>>> not even use a single kselftest API. Convert it.
>>>
>>> It simplifies some of the code and the output also looks much nicer now:
>>>
>>>   Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
>>
> 
> Assuming this is going through sched tree,
> 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks, I think Peter is out so it may take a while going through the sched
tree. This individual patch is independent as such and could go through the
kselftest tree. However, I am totally Ok with either option.

Also, thanks to you and Chris for the tags and I will add them for future
submissions.

 - Joel
  

On 2/20/2024 7:03 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/16/24 12:18, Chris Hyser wrote:
>> On 2/16/24 13:31, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>
>>> This test begs to be a kselftest, is in the kselftest hierarchy and does
>>> not even use a single kselftest API. Convert it.
>>>
>>> It simplifies some of the code and the output also looks much nicer now:
>>>
>>>   Totals: pass:17 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
>>
> 
> Assuming this is going through sched tree,
> 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks, I think Peter is out so it may take a while going through the sched
tree. This individual patch is independent as such and could go through the
kselftest tree. However, I am totally Ok with either option.

Also, thanks to you and Chris for the tags and I will add them for future postings.

 - Joel