[v5,13/14] c++: Implement __rank built-in trait
Checks
Commit Message
This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-trait.def: Define __rank.
* semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK.
(finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __rank.
* g++.dg/ext/rank.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
---
gcc/cp/cp-trait.def | 1 +
gcc/cp/semantics.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C | 3 +++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C | 14 ++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
Comments
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote:
> This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank.
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * cp-trait.def: Define __rank.
> * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK.
> (finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __rank.
> * g++.dg/ext/rank.C: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> ---
> gcc/cp/cp-trait.def | 1 +
> gcc/cp/semantics.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C | 3 +++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> index 11270f3ae6b..3d5a7970563 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE, "__is_trivially_assignable", 2)
> DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE, "__is_trivially_constructible", -1)
> DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE, "__is_trivially_copyable", 1)
> DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_UNION, "__is_union", 1)
> +DEFTRAIT_EXPR (RANK, "__rank", 1)
> DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONSTRUCTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_constructs_from_temporary", 2)
> DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONVERTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_converts_from_temporary", 2)
> DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_ALL_EXTENTS, "__remove_all_extents", 1)
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> index 256e7ef8166..4f285909b83 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> @@ -12538,6 +12538,9 @@ trait_expr_value (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> case CPTK_IS_DEDUCIBLE:
> return type_targs_deducible_from (type1, type2);
>
> + /* __rank is handled in finish_trait_expr. */
> + case CPTK_RANK:
> +
> #define DEFTRAIT_TYPE(CODE, NAME, ARITY) \
> case CPTK_##CODE:
> #include "cp-trait.def"
> @@ -12698,6 +12701,7 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> case CPTK_IS_SAME:
> case CPTK_IS_SCOPED_ENUM:
> case CPTK_IS_UNION:
> + case CPTK_RANK:
> break;
>
> case CPTK_IS_LAYOUT_COMPATIBLE:
> @@ -12729,8 +12733,18 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> gcc_unreachable ();
> }
>
> - tree val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> - ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> + tree val;
> + if (kind == CPTK_RANK)
> + {
> + size_t rank = 0;
> + for (; TREE_CODE (type1) == ARRAY_TYPE; type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1))
> + ++rank;
> + val = build_int_cst (size_type_node, rank);
So this will be the first expression-yielding trait that's not a bool.
That's no problem conceptually, but I think we hardcode their bool-ness
near the top of finish_trait_expr when returning a templated version of
the trait. We should instead give templated __rank the type size_type_node.
> + }
> + else
> + val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> + ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> +
> return maybe_wrap_with_location (val, loc);
> }
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> index 5b590db1cf6..a00193c1a81 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> @@ -167,6 +167,9 @@
> #if !__has_builtin (__is_union)
> # error "__has_builtin (__is_union) failed"
> #endif
> +#if !__has_builtin (__rank)
> +# error "__has_builtin (__rank) failed"
> +#endif
> #if !__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary)
> # error "__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary) failed"
> #endif
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..bab062d776e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
> +
> +class ClassType { };
> +
> +SA(__rank(int) == 0);
> +SA(__rank(int[2]) == 1);
> +SA(__rank(int[][4]) == 2);
> +SA(__rank(int[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
> +SA(__rank(ClassType) == 0);
> +SA(__rank(ClassType[2]) == 1);
> +SA(__rank(ClassType[][4]) == 2);
> +SA(__rank(ClassType[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
We should have a test that the __rank inside a template has the correct
type, something like (this should currently fail with your patch as-is
due to the hardcoded bool type):
template<class T> void f(T) = delete;
void f(bool);
template<class T>
void g() { f(__rank(T)); }
template void g<int>();
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:48 PM Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote:
>
> > This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank.
> >
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * cp-trait.def: Define __rank.
> > * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK.
> > (finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __rank.
> > * g++.dg/ext/rank.C: New test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> > ---
> > gcc/cp/cp-trait.def | 1 +
> > gcc/cp/semantics.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C | 3 +++
> > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > index 11270f3ae6b..3d5a7970563 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE, "__is_trivially_assignable", 2)
> > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE, "__is_trivially_constructible", -1)
> > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE, "__is_trivially_copyable", 1)
> > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_UNION, "__is_union", 1)
> > +DEFTRAIT_EXPR (RANK, "__rank", 1)
> > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONSTRUCTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_constructs_from_temporary", 2)
> > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONVERTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_converts_from_temporary", 2)
> > DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_ALL_EXTENTS, "__remove_all_extents", 1)
> > diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > index 256e7ef8166..4f285909b83 100644
> > --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > @@ -12538,6 +12538,9 @@ trait_expr_value (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > case CPTK_IS_DEDUCIBLE:
> > return type_targs_deducible_from (type1, type2);
> >
> > + /* __rank is handled in finish_trait_expr. */
> > + case CPTK_RANK:
> > +
> > #define DEFTRAIT_TYPE(CODE, NAME, ARITY) \
> > case CPTK_##CODE:
> > #include "cp-trait.def"
> > @@ -12698,6 +12701,7 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > case CPTK_IS_SAME:
> > case CPTK_IS_SCOPED_ENUM:
> > case CPTK_IS_UNION:
> > + case CPTK_RANK:
> > break;
> >
> > case CPTK_IS_LAYOUT_COMPATIBLE:
> > @@ -12729,8 +12733,18 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > gcc_unreachable ();
> > }
> >
> > - tree val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> > - ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> > + tree val;
> > + if (kind == CPTK_RANK)
> > + {
> > + size_t rank = 0;
> > + for (; TREE_CODE (type1) == ARRAY_TYPE; type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1))
> > + ++rank;
> > + val = build_int_cst (size_type_node, rank);
>
> So this will be the first expression-yielding trait that's not a bool.
> That's no problem conceptually, but I think we hardcode their bool-ness
> near the top of finish_trait_expr when returning a templated version of
> the trait. We should instead give templated __rank the type size_type_node.
>
> > + }
> > + else
> > + val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> > + ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> > +
> > return maybe_wrap_with_location (val, loc);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > index 5b590db1cf6..a00193c1a81 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > @@ -167,6 +167,9 @@
> > #if !__has_builtin (__is_union)
> > # error "__has_builtin (__is_union) failed"
> > #endif
> > +#if !__has_builtin (__rank)
> > +# error "__has_builtin (__rank) failed"
> > +#endif
> > #if !__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary)
> > # error "__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary) failed"
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..bab062d776e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > +
> > +#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
> > +
> > +class ClassType { };
> > +
> > +SA(__rank(int) == 0);
> > +SA(__rank(int[2]) == 1);
> > +SA(__rank(int[][4]) == 2);
> > +SA(__rank(int[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
> > +SA(__rank(ClassType) == 0);
> > +SA(__rank(ClassType[2]) == 1);
> > +SA(__rank(ClassType[][4]) == 2);
> > +SA(__rank(ClassType[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
>
> We should have a test that the __rank inside a template has the correct
> type, something like (this should currently fail with your patch as-is
> due to the hardcoded bool type):
>
> template<class T> void f(T) = delete;
> void f(bool);
>
> template<class T>
> void g() { f(__rank(T)); }
>
> template void g<int>();
>
Thank you! I think this test should be the following, to fail with my
patch as-is:
- void f(bool);
+ void f(size_t);
since we are expecting size_t from __rank. The current patch passed
this test and failed with a test with change, and my updated patch
failed with this test and passed a test with this change.
I will submit the updated patch soon. Thank you for pointing this out!
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:14 PM Ken Matsui <kmatsui@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:48 PM Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ken Matsui wrote:
> >
> > > This patch implements built-in trait for std::rank.
> > >
> > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * cp-trait.def: Define __rank.
> > > * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_RANK.
> > > (finish_trait_expr): Likewise.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __rank.
> > > * g++.dg/ext/rank.C: New test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> > > ---
> > > gcc/cp/cp-trait.def | 1 +
> > > gcc/cp/semantics.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C | 3 +++
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > index 11270f3ae6b..3d5a7970563 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE, "__is_trivially_assignable", 2)
> > > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE, "__is_trivially_constructible", -1)
> > > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE, "__is_trivially_copyable", 1)
> > > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_UNION, "__is_union", 1)
> > > +DEFTRAIT_EXPR (RANK, "__rank", 1)
> > > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONSTRUCTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_constructs_from_temporary", 2)
> > > DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONVERTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_converts_from_temporary", 2)
> > > DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_ALL_EXTENTS, "__remove_all_extents", 1)
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > index 256e7ef8166..4f285909b83 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > @@ -12538,6 +12538,9 @@ trait_expr_value (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > > case CPTK_IS_DEDUCIBLE:
> > > return type_targs_deducible_from (type1, type2);
> > >
> > > + /* __rank is handled in finish_trait_expr. */
> > > + case CPTK_RANK:
> > > +
> > > #define DEFTRAIT_TYPE(CODE, NAME, ARITY) \
> > > case CPTK_##CODE:
> > > #include "cp-trait.def"
> > > @@ -12698,6 +12701,7 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > > case CPTK_IS_SAME:
> > > case CPTK_IS_SCOPED_ENUM:
> > > case CPTK_IS_UNION:
> > > + case CPTK_RANK:
> > > break;
> > >
> > > case CPTK_IS_LAYOUT_COMPATIBLE:
> > > @@ -12729,8 +12733,18 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
> > > gcc_unreachable ();
> > > }
> > >
> > > - tree val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> > > - ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> > > + tree val;
> > > + if (kind == CPTK_RANK)
> > > + {
> > > + size_t rank = 0;
> > > + for (; TREE_CODE (type1) == ARRAY_TYPE; type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1))
> > > + ++rank;
> > > + val = build_int_cst (size_type_node, rank);
> >
> > So this will be the first expression-yielding trait that's not a bool.
> > That's no problem conceptually, but I think we hardcode their bool-ness
> > near the top of finish_trait_expr when returning a templated version of
> > the trait. We should instead give templated __rank the type size_type_node.
> >
> > > + }
> > > + else
> > > + val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
> > > + ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
> > > +
> > > return maybe_wrap_with_location (val, loc);
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > index 5b590db1cf6..a00193c1a81 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > @@ -167,6 +167,9 @@
> > > #if !__has_builtin (__is_union)
> > > # error "__has_builtin (__is_union) failed"
> > > #endif
> > > +#if !__has_builtin (__rank)
> > > +# error "__has_builtin (__rank) failed"
> > > +#endif
> > > #if !__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary)
> > > # error "__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary) failed"
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..bab062d776e
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/rank.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > > +
> > > +#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
> > > +
> > > +class ClassType { };
> > > +
> > > +SA(__rank(int) == 0);
> > > +SA(__rank(int[2]) == 1);
> > > +SA(__rank(int[][4]) == 2);
> > > +SA(__rank(int[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
> > > +SA(__rank(ClassType) == 0);
> > > +SA(__rank(ClassType[2]) == 1);
> > > +SA(__rank(ClassType[][4]) == 2);
> > > +SA(__rank(ClassType[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
> >
> > We should have a test that the __rank inside a template has the correct
> > type, something like (this should currently fail with your patch as-is
> > due to the hardcoded bool type):
> >
> > template<class T> void f(T) = delete;
> > void f(bool);
> >
> > template<class T>
> > void g() { f(__rank(T)); }
> >
> > template void g<int>();
> >
>
> Thank you! I think this test should be the following, to fail with my
> patch as-is:
>
> - void f(bool);
> + void f(size_t);
>
> since we are expecting size_t from __rank. The current patch passed
> this test and failed with a test with change, and my updated patch
> failed with this test and passed a test with this change.
>
Sorry, the wording was a bit confusing. Just in case, here is what I meant.
v5
passed yours (expect bool)
failed with this change (expect size_t)
v6
failed with yours (expect bool)
passed this change (expect size_t)
Again, thank you for your review, Patrick!
> I will submit the updated patch soon. Thank you for pointing this out!
>
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
> >
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE, "__is_trivially_assignable", 2)
DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE, "__is_trivially_constructible", -1)
DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE, "__is_trivially_copyable", 1)
DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_UNION, "__is_union", 1)
+DEFTRAIT_EXPR (RANK, "__rank", 1)
DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONSTRUCTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_constructs_from_temporary", 2)
DEFTRAIT_EXPR (REF_CONVERTS_FROM_TEMPORARY, "__reference_converts_from_temporary", 2)
DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_ALL_EXTENTS, "__remove_all_extents", 1)
@@ -12538,6 +12538,9 @@ trait_expr_value (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
case CPTK_IS_DEDUCIBLE:
return type_targs_deducible_from (type1, type2);
+ /* __rank is handled in finish_trait_expr. */
+ case CPTK_RANK:
+
#define DEFTRAIT_TYPE(CODE, NAME, ARITY) \
case CPTK_##CODE:
#include "cp-trait.def"
@@ -12698,6 +12701,7 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
case CPTK_IS_SAME:
case CPTK_IS_SCOPED_ENUM:
case CPTK_IS_UNION:
+ case CPTK_RANK:
break;
case CPTK_IS_LAYOUT_COMPATIBLE:
@@ -12729,8 +12733,18 @@ finish_trait_expr (location_t loc, cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
gcc_unreachable ();
}
- tree val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
- ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
+ tree val;
+ if (kind == CPTK_RANK)
+ {
+ size_t rank = 0;
+ for (; TREE_CODE (type1) == ARRAY_TYPE; type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1))
+ ++rank;
+ val = build_int_cst (size_type_node, rank);
+ }
+ else
+ val = (trait_expr_value (kind, type1, type2)
+ ? boolean_true_node : boolean_false_node);
+
return maybe_wrap_with_location (val, loc);
}
@@ -167,6 +167,9 @@
#if !__has_builtin (__is_union)
# error "__has_builtin (__is_union) failed"
#endif
+#if !__has_builtin (__rank)
+# error "__has_builtin (__rank) failed"
+#endif
#if !__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary)
# error "__has_builtin (__reference_constructs_from_temporary) failed"
#endif
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
+
+class ClassType { };
+
+SA(__rank(int) == 0);
+SA(__rank(int[2]) == 1);
+SA(__rank(int[][4]) == 2);
+SA(__rank(int[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);
+SA(__rank(ClassType) == 0);
+SA(__rank(ClassType[2]) == 1);
+SA(__rank(ClassType[][4]) == 2);
+SA(__rank(ClassType[2][2][4][4][6][6]) == 6);