Message ID | 20221123095202.599252-3-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:f944:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id q4csp2698420wrr; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 02:08:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf48Is7Ofhlh2ijxtE3HN7qEyFu6p97jHj66NOZomSYmtl8jEZZWtmFdrxlJXuL2oHLckpGf X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e0d7:b0:7b9:a74b:f16a with SMTP id gl23-20020a170906e0d700b007b9a74bf16amr2432446ejb.192.1669198099988; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 02:08:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669198099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aT+QOAc8PDvCTUYufQ/fMi2FMa5EGhodx0dxxVCACrrsUasZUE7kV2Jg184l3aniXt cBLjusa28Fqk9/cC/mC5EI4Xe0i4FVLnR3TchIIS9NFjLSPM/Ah4lKhCRpGgI+gCpgX/ UC430T9sR3Z3JbXgf2RYdCFHIo59Ux/iR5fEcDn/FAGQMYqmSBWN0PmX5eUQRrE993Kp wdhUpsxABfI8LkokuN9e/tELQ8rPCiXC2xvdtjUXLGk4sPnVASWY9md7Mm8jMUbemHTv 5WZh/H6oenypr/bQE4qgW7eJC9CTGNYgDSiqEMtZG3cjPKDvRnJFj4gLkUyx2UYu4Tsa eb6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=lO1mFu3EycTFouUt7DwoeKPjF9aCJcmA5WD/n34ftd8=; b=iW2PZheR7LuoLLa4CM54/DhY1SLYAz8r0Mbjjkbo33EHOhUFlJNxRG+YLhkAFD+9It WnC/A4Az1/2/p6uDeu7ObpJNxBzXKf7AFNgBLuZbauP5rI0R6Vn4Kbi7+T2loehqfgzr Q2Dws1ypQfgFCvntH1FhTY8a/AaDWyMASlWHQCik3k0p69Bm3ZCwQikjbAasAD80b/hd /qNvsrpwR4k5ZYlcLt136GoRcb2Nk8ISwgui+Y6QkPuGEeIeSBoeHgwQ3ejeJrTuFVPh xkhUfckYQ0B5Iuzk5Deids03pcriTlGlu3nic5TyJYJLPz2/ayygmQRD0hQxqKsI7ReB 3ugw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oz35-20020a1709077da300b007b5ce4a4360si8716551ejc.151.2022.11.23.02.07.51; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 02:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236860AbiKWKCX (ORCPT <rfc822;cjcooper78@gmail.com> + 99 others); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 05:02:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57270 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236901AbiKWKBD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 05:01:03 -0500 Received: from frasgout12.his.huawei.com (frasgout12.his.huawei.com [14.137.139.154]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AE4F11A704; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 01:53:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.228]) by frasgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NHGVd4fZRz9xFXk; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:46:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.204.63.22]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id LxC2BwAH829J7X1jzDqKAA--.13162S4; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:52:40 +0100 (CET) From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> To: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, eparis@parisplace.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH v5 2/6] ocfs2: Switch to security_inode_init_security() Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:51:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20221123095202.599252-3-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20221123095202.599252-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221123095202.599252-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: LxC2BwAH829J7X1jzDqKAA--.13162S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxCw4rKFyxCF1xJw4fAr4xZwb_yoWrKryrpa 1rtFnxtr4fJFy8Wryftr4a9a1S9rWrGrZrGrs3G34DZFn8Cr1ftry0yr1Y9Fy5XrWDJFyk tr4Fkrsxuws8JwUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBab4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUXw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6r4UJVWxJr1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2 WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkE bVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2xKxwCF04k20xvY0x 0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E 7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_WrylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcV C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwCI42IY 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aV CY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UC9aPUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: purev21wro2thvvxqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/1tbiAgAFBF1jj4HGZgAAsT X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1750281067284945051?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1750281067284945051?= |
Series |
evm: Prepare for moving to the LSM infrastructure
|
|
Commit Message
Roberto Sassu
Nov. 23, 2022, 9:51 a.m. UTC
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to security_inode_init_security(). Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. Supporting multiple xattrs is not currently supported, as it requires non-trivial changes that can be done at a later time. As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by LSMs. Finally, modify the handling of the return value from ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the return value is not zero. However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned -EOPNOTSUPP). Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 10:51 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > security_inode_init_security(). > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. Supporting > multiple xattrs is not currently supported, as it requires non-trivial > changes that can be done at a later time. ocfs2 already defines ocfs2_init_security_get() as a wrapper around calling either security_old_inode_init_security() or security_inode_init_security(). Based on "si" one or the other hook is called. ocfs2_initxattrs is already defined. struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { .name = NULL, .enable = 1, }; The main difference between calling security_old_inode_init_security or security_inode_init_security() is whether or not security.evm is calculated and written. Perhaps it is time to remove the call to security_old_inode_init_security() in ocfs2_init_security_get(). We need to hear back from the ocfs2 community. Mark? Joel? As noted previously this change affects mknod and symlinks. Mimi > > As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > LSMs. > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > return value is not zero. > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > int want_meta = 0; > int xattr_credits = 0; > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > + .name = NULL, > .enable = 1, > }; > int did_quota_inode = 0; > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > /* get security xattr */ > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > if (status) { > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > - si.enable = 0; > - else { > - mlog_errno(status); > - goto leave; > - } > + mlog_errno(status); > + goto leave; > } > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > int want_clusters = 0; > int xattr_credits = 0; > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > + .name = NULL, > .enable = 1, > }; > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > /* get security xattr */ > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > if (status) { > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > - si.enable = 0; > - else { > - mlog_errno(status); > - goto bail; > - } > + mlog_errno(status); > + goto bail; > } > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > void *fs_info) > { > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > const struct xattr *xattr; > int err = 0; > > + if (si) { > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!si->value) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > + return 0; > + } > + > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > xattr->name, xattr->value, > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > const struct qstr *qstr, > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > { > + int ret; > + > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > - if (si) > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > - &si->name, &si->value, > - &si->value_len); > + if (si) { > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > + /* > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > + */ > + if (!ret && !si->name) > + si->enable = 0; > + > + return ret; > + } > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 12:46 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 10:51 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. Supporting > > multiple xattrs is not currently supported, as it requires non-trivial > > changes that can be done at a later time. > > ocfs2 already defines ocfs2_init_security_get() as a wrapper around > calling either security_old_inode_init_security() or > security_inode_init_security(). Based on "si" one or the other hook is > called. ocfs2_initxattrs is already defined. > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > .name = NULL, > .enable = 1, > }; > > The main difference between calling security_old_inode_init_security or > security_inode_init_security() is whether or not security.evm is > calculated and written. Uhm, it seems unfortunately more complicated. Calling security_old_inode_init_security() allows filesystems to get the xattr, do some calculations (e.g. for reservation) and then write the xattr. The initxattrs() callback to be passed to security_inode_init_security() is meant to let filesystems provide a filesystem-specific way of writing the xattrs, just after LSMs provided them. This seems incompatible with the old behavior, as a filesystem might need to do the calculations in the middle before writing the xattrs. The initxattrs() callback, when security_old_inode_init_security() was used, is just a way of emulating the old behavior, i.e. returning the xattr to the caller. It should be possible, I guess, to handle more xattrs but if the code was designed to handle one, it would be better if the filesystem maintainers add support for it. Thanks Roberto > Perhaps it is time to remove the call to > security_old_inode_init_security() in ocfs2_init_security_get(). We > need to hear back from the ocfs2 community. Mark? Joel? > > As noted previously this change affects mknod and symlinks. > > Mimi > > > As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > > LSMs. > > > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > > return value is not zero. > > > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > --- > > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > int want_meta = 0; > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > + .name = NULL, > > .enable = 1, > > }; > > int did_quota_inode = 0; > > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > /* get security xattr */ > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > if (status) { > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > - si.enable = 0; > > - else { > > - mlog_errno(status); > > - goto leave; > > - } > > + mlog_errno(status); > > + goto leave; > > } > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > int want_clusters = 0; > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > + .name = NULL, > > .enable = 1, > > }; > > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > /* get security xattr */ > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > if (status) { > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > - si.enable = 0; > > - else { > > - mlog_errno(status); > > - goto bail; > > - } > > + mlog_errno(status); > > + goto bail; > > } > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > void *fs_info) > > { > > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > > const struct xattr *xattr; > > int err = 0; > > > > + if (si) { > > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!si->value) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > xattr->name, xattr->value, > > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > > const struct qstr *qstr, > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > > { > > + int ret; > > + > > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > - if (si) > > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > - &si->name, &si->value, > > - &si->value_len); > > + if (si) { > > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > > + /* > > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > > + */ > > + if (!ret && !si->name) > > + si->enable = 0; > > + > > + return ret; > > + } > > > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 09:11 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 12:46 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 10:51 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. Supporting > > > multiple xattrs is not currently supported, as it requires non-trivial > > > changes that can be done at a later time. > > > > ocfs2 already defines ocfs2_init_security_get() as a wrapper around > > calling either security_old_inode_init_security() or > > security_inode_init_security(). Based on "si" one or the other hook is > > called. ocfs2_initxattrs is already defined. > > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > .name = NULL, > > .enable = 1, > > }; > > > > The main difference between calling security_old_inode_init_security or > > security_inode_init_security() is whether or not security.evm is > > calculated and written. > > Uhm, it seems unfortunately more complicated. > > Calling security_old_inode_init_security() allows filesystems to get > the xattr, do some calculations (e.g. for reservation) and then write > the xattr. > > The initxattrs() callback to be passed to > security_inode_init_security() is meant to let filesystems provide a > filesystem-specific way of writing the xattrs, just after LSMs provided > them. This seems incompatible with the old behavior, as a filesystem > might need to do the calculations in the middle before writing the > xattrs. > > The initxattrs() callback, when security_old_inode_init_security() was > used, is just a way of emulating the old behavior, i.e. returning the > xattr to the caller. > > It should be possible, I guess, to handle more xattrs but if the code > was designed to handle one, it would be better if the filesystem > maintainers add support for it. Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph, Commit 9d8f13ba3f48 ("security: new security_inode_init_security API adds function callback") introduced security_old_inode_init_security() to support reiserfs and ocfs2 a long time ago. It was suppose to be a temporary fix until they moved to the new security_inode_init_security() hook. ocsf2 partially migrated to security_inode_init_security(), but not completely. security_old_inode_init_security() is finally going away. Instead of migrating the remaining old usage to the new security_inode_init_security() properly, this patch simulates the existing usage. Can we get some Reviewed-by, Tested-by tags or comments? thanks, Mimi > > > Perhaps it is time to remove the call to > > security_old_inode_init_security() in ocfs2_init_security_get(). We > > need to hear back from the ocfs2 community. Mark? Joel? > > > > As noted previously this change affects mknod and symlinks. > > > > > > > As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > > > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > > > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > > > LSMs. > > > > > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > > > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > > > return value is not zero. > > > > > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > > > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > > > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > > > > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > > > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > > > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > > > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > > > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > > --- > > > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > > > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > int want_meta = 0; > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > + .name = NULL, > > > .enable = 1, > > > }; > > > int did_quota_inode = 0; > > > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > if (status) { > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > - else { > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > - goto leave; > > > - } > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > + goto leave; > > > } > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > > > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > int want_clusters = 0; > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > + .name = NULL, > > > .enable = 1, > > > }; > > > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > > > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > if (status) { > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > - else { > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > - goto bail; > > > - } > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > + goto bail; > > > } > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > > > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > > void *fs_info) > > > { > > > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > > > const struct xattr *xattr; > > > int err = 0; > > > > > > + if (si) { > > > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!si->value) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > > > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > > > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > > xattr->name, xattr->value, > > > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > > > const struct qstr *qstr, > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > > > { > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > > > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > - if (si) > > > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > - &si->name, &si->value, > > > - &si->value_len); > > > + if (si) { > > > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > > > + /* > > > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > > > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > > > + */ > > > + if (!ret && !si->name) > > > + si->enable = 0; > > > + > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > > > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL); >
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 08:14 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 09:11 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 12:46 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 10:51 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > > > > > > > In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to > > > > security_inode_init_security(). > > > > > > > > Extend the existing ocfs2_initxattrs() to take the > > > > ocfs2_security_xattr_info structure from fs_info, and populate the > > > > name/value/len triple with the first xattr provided by LSMs. Supporting > > > > multiple xattrs is not currently supported, as it requires non-trivial > > > > changes that can be done at a later time. > > > > > > ocfs2 already defines ocfs2_init_security_get() as a wrapper around > > > calling either security_old_inode_init_security() or > > > security_inode_init_security(). Based on "si" one or the other hook is > > > called. ocfs2_initxattrs is already defined. > > > > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > .name = NULL, > > > .enable = 1, > > > }; > > > > > > The main difference between calling security_old_inode_init_security or > > > security_inode_init_security() is whether or not security.evm is > > > calculated and written. > > > > Uhm, it seems unfortunately more complicated. > > > > Calling security_old_inode_init_security() allows filesystems to get > > the xattr, do some calculations (e.g. for reservation) and then write > > the xattr. > > > > The initxattrs() callback to be passed to > > security_inode_init_security() is meant to let filesystems provide a > > filesystem-specific way of writing the xattrs, just after LSMs provided > > them. This seems incompatible with the old behavior, as a filesystem > > might need to do the calculations in the middle before writing the > > xattrs. > > > > The initxattrs() callback, when security_old_inode_init_security() was > > used, is just a way of emulating the old behavior, i.e. returning the > > xattr to the caller. > > > > It should be possible, I guess, to handle more xattrs but if the code > > was designed to handle one, it would be better if the filesystem > > maintainers add support for it. > > Hi Mark, Joel, Joseph, > > Commit 9d8f13ba3f48 ("security: new security_inode_init_security API > adds function callback") introduced security_old_inode_init_security() > to support reiserfs and ocfs2 a long time ago. It was suppose to be a > temporary fix until they moved to the new > security_inode_init_security() hook. ocsf2 partially migrated to > security_inode_init_security(), but not completely. > > security_old_inode_init_security() is finally going away. Instead of > migrating the remaining old usage to the new > security_inode_init_security() properly, this patch simulates the > existing usage. > > Can we get some Reviewed-by, Tested-by tags or comments? Ping. Thanks Roberto > thanks, > > Mimi > > > > Perhaps it is time to remove the call to > > > security_old_inode_init_security() in ocfs2_init_security_get(). We > > > need to hear back from the ocfs2 community. Mark? Joel? > > > > > > As noted previously this change affects mknod and symlinks. > > > > > > > > > > As fs_info was not used before, ocfs2_initxattrs() can now handle the case > > > > of replicating the behavior of security_old_inode_init_security(), i.e. > > > > just obtaining the xattr, in addition to setting all xattrs provided by > > > > LSMs. > > > > > > > > Finally, modify the handling of the return value from > > > > ocfs2_init_security_get(). As security_inode_init_security() does not > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP, remove this case and directly handle the error if the > > > > return value is not zero. > > > > > > > > However, the previous case of receiving -EOPNOTSUPP should be still > > > > taken into account, as security_inode_init_security() could return zero > > > > without setting xattrs and ocfs2 would consider it as if the xattr was set. > > > > > > > > Instead, if security_inode_init_security() returned zero, look at the xattr > > > > if it was set, and behave accordingly, i.e. set si->enable to zero to > > > > notify to the functions following ocfs2_init_security_get() that the xattr > > > > is not available (same as if security_old_inode_init_security() returned > > > > -EOPNOTSUPP). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> > > > > --- > > > > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 ++++++------------ > > > > fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > > index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c > > > > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > > int want_meta = 0; > > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > > + .name = NULL, > > > > .enable = 1, > > > > }; > > > > int did_quota_inode = 0; > > > > @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > > if (status) { > > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > > - else { > > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > > - goto leave; > > > > - } > > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > > + goto leave; > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ > > > > @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > > int want_clusters = 0; > > > > int xattr_credits = 0; > > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { > > > > + .name = NULL, > > > > .enable = 1, > > > > }; > > > > int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; > > > > @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > > > /* get security xattr */ > > > > status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); > > > > if (status) { > > > > - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > > - si.enable = 0; > > > > - else { > > > > - mlog_errno(status); > > > > - goto bail; > > > > - } > > > > + mlog_errno(status); > > > > + goto bail; > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ > > > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > > index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c > > > > @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, > > > > static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > > > void *fs_info) > > > > { > > > > + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; > > > > const struct xattr *xattr; > > > > int err = 0; > > > > > > > > + if (si) { > > > > + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, > > > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > + if (!si->value) > > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > + > > > > + si->name = xattr_array->name; > > > > + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; > > > > + return 0; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > > > > err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > > > xattr->name, xattr->value, > > > > @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, > > > > const struct qstr *qstr, > > > > struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) > > > > { > > > > + int ret; > > > > + > > > > /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ > > > > if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > - if (si) > > > > - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > > - &si->name, &si->value, > > > > - &si->value_len); > > > > + if (si) { > > > > + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > > + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); > > > > + /* > > > > + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, > > > > + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. > > > > + */ > > > > + if (!ret && !si->name) > > > > + si->enable = 0; > > > > + > > > > + return ret; > > > > + } > > > > > > > > return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, > > > > &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 05f32989bad6..55fba81cd2d1 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, int want_meta = 0; int xattr_credits = 0; struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { + .name = NULL, .enable = 1, }; int did_quota_inode = 0; @@ -315,12 +316,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, /* get security xattr */ status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); if (status) { - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) - si.enable = 0; - else { - mlog_errno(status); - goto leave; - } + mlog_errno(status); + goto leave; } /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security and acl xattr */ @@ -1805,6 +1802,7 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, int want_clusters = 0; int xattr_credits = 0; struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info si = { + .name = NULL, .enable = 1, }; int did_quota = 0, did_quota_inode = 0; @@ -1875,12 +1873,8 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, /* get security xattr */ status = ocfs2_init_security_get(inode, dir, &dentry->d_name, &si); if (status) { - if (status == -EOPNOTSUPP) - si.enable = 0; - else { - mlog_errno(status); - goto bail; - } + mlog_errno(status); + goto bail; } /* calculate meta data/clusters for setting security xattr */ diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c index 95d0611c5fc7..55699c573541 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c @@ -7259,9 +7259,21 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, static int ocfs2_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, void *fs_info) { + struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si = fs_info; const struct xattr *xattr; int err = 0; + if (si) { + si->value = kmemdup(xattr_array->value, xattr_array->value_len, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!si->value) + return -ENOMEM; + + si->name = xattr_array->name; + si->value_len = xattr_array->value_len; + return 0; + } + for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { err = ocfs2_xattr_set(inode, OCFS2_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, xattr->name, xattr->value, @@ -7277,13 +7289,23 @@ int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *inode, const struct qstr *qstr, struct ocfs2_security_xattr_info *si) { + int ret; + /* check whether ocfs2 support feature xattr */ if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb))) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (si) - return security_old_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, - &si->name, &si->value, - &si->value_len); + if (si) { + ret = security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, + &ocfs2_initxattrs, si); + /* + * security_inode_init_security() does not return -EOPNOTSUPP, + * we have to check the xattr ourselves. + */ + if (!ret && !si->name) + si->enable = 0; + + return ret; + } return security_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, &ocfs2_initxattrs, NULL);