Message ID | 20240204031022.1189-1-qwjhust@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7301:168b:b0:106:860b:bbdd with SMTP id ma11csp178169dyb; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 19:17:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvvCGa412jjsS9j6UxnR0PM23VG6KPbx9Mw6VBJ8Bj7xKU0Cg5qWsJ4xYAKRcLHnxy7o0P X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:650:b0:1d9:87b6:e09e with SMTP id kh16-20020a170903065000b001d987b6e09emr4112355plb.21.1707016679637; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:17:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707016679; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DpUOUIOVuW2f7sDRjLwpiM+AAeW98R/6w2HqgUiykWJXnIfqPDzv8kMrcZrEz077eN SPcZUChaLxudQ8n2Cn0k5MJ5S3L0sJhpB7VvXhWtClgDsEj3l9tkjbYtNlgFPucxw2ny VzXUP3EL9bKYk4NcuBvu5ql9YOtXfd9grHsfbGaP5tb7eLzk5fDiuvgR2EMsx2IgZGxM Z9Z8wieOG3/kWS5Th047skmB7jeagdMumz+noLpPgpI1Q5qkd1QHYB2/dCb1Uvlb3/dZ TbCJD71RYu7ziWDkhNlyjmcpRgGNHJzMhSP4wDpb2+RMGGTojAqFOvLB+iFKjS01R2b7 LKfg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=+usYO9kmYXbpy+mniJppEmKl5G0Ak9hnYSfizal5zIo=; fh=s4ZDGjQSPydVmeYZZ3aOjiFMvcNl2OiIfdiiloLSYCc=; b=DU0xqgMmL8GwpxrQsa7rwoluSbJjCD5X6EdRNLTQsCAunAiVc7Hc9ibUZpZxPXZx8I OnBztNZdUqUCpSGgvMzuuSDYWQ7Bitjbt//IcjvTcYdHH/voWlxjA57EFFhJ5TkP+sI6 /h4EXKeuowwqplzCAY7ZUb3I3quQdET4QykPfpvatk5HkKF7wejLuKssHC4OygI0WRMu QPUwQTKnDls2gOnEktqNHPNM6bMaI+OX4Wmi4w/ndncgPCceFAgdYZUgytUNu6h22p5P PDsa0ZF/0T9BOQyCgd7tsHJxZTwzeE1IJ8Hh5hno+tp34vIvmkn6wUo2aErn6xWqcPV3 mpRg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=nZL3VzbJ; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWTyJAV7OfOrTKUn4Xmt/i61pfZh6LET3tHSv0gid8RPHu8TUw0S9zmiUl5aTaRWBO4QdpDH3oWJ4kmxYuVjBGM8gl4tA== Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5-20020a1709028c8500b001d952ae03fcsi4083874plo.602.2024.02.03.19.17.59 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=nZL3VzbJ; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-51396-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901542896C4 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 03:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED37146BB; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 03:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="nZL3VzbJ" Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com (mail-pj1-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21B410EB for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 03:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.47 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707016281; cv=none; b=lsTitqEG2C+zVSyby65m0v0vgn+ULagOjOlWUEB13phLvv+D3U/zst1o4ofr65aUeuSCJLTltJYy1r29JVHalnQ6P+1nlUoyoBbjGKPAJxTT06BDyY7QLpJh12w+tKIG196Ur4J8J6u4vJF8Sx8XCvMAA7Oy/3fQs2l/6gO9Hlo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707016281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rg/Q7uvffcTHZcJlhEx+89mKvetaAH1fSbnyGWrBPAA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=XFjShDEiwvSoSrOvR3R0If+RiT0RncFYoaCkD7a3bDDLh4DoripJ1z0z6pOOLn94doBxywOyvzlWtBPaKAV8E1k1Q5W4C3TYqu6StdwnyrVm2+nFoLQupK3dkq9K4/6n2iRkeQ2JBHG6nRGuEIAnluO1IM1rTKXeeROgxOWjPwY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=nZL3VzbJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-295f9a4a656so2751875a91.1 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707016279; x=1707621079; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+usYO9kmYXbpy+mniJppEmKl5G0Ak9hnYSfizal5zIo=; b=nZL3VzbJV/rXQ0FX/JKmvjNuzxnUnitafz+mDtTnLXt7PnLA7u5aaX30h52BV5JeCw 2QQp4/s/+vugWhZTqgRJUdXA3/KsGdgIh7sxVN4ARSgmyiPgAc7ktqslWTI/lnWnDUQv 5B3JsY+4rLO3UxGJHfe756BnDxHELgu6qZfYHvjnW49w06BQvHpSQR8q+8nVBBo6BLWy ku5tsYeE/gm0wjSOneUbWcjoHmzNpnAHg0SBKRpBOX5SadIzFtVoGv2as2Baec3mzq5O munPtu3JP5ctRNL14yeNw6wRA27CwRtX3qtnDPp7cp6E4Zc48hQ/2Uu0F2cv81Daw8w/ TklA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707016279; x=1707621079; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+usYO9kmYXbpy+mniJppEmKl5G0Ak9hnYSfizal5zIo=; b=A8WLAfX4YnYlDl7dD0a2zAgrbw4UEA//27WskYxMxw2HY2ojgYpWDVb1ZfJSGdPvPy c58Ue9piu+jl3OD34/jLCsfOanfn/ewnO2JOXo6RUKLq91cn+1gM0yDEyv4LXCtO21Ch dyqeO0nFYB0/bMIFkcWdtQG1UmIcTreLOvSFC6Cl3ZWVz5nF803OsTZQYnjrM0EFmWQK xSfDTlQgD8fU0BUXg7yZ+VH1j5u9PD9eam5aMtHmeyfIb7oNhS3NHrUOEyARg0bpt3K5 TlhJN+qa9qByf/aEGPV3oSO4I3KqX+ijkaoFG//4qzHjp1MUU4NjzEaNDYZxNpQm9E0g bE5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx8lvlIjMqt8LsByFUD+Yopt/MInkWizu2Ig0R6ZQkYYfVCuwbB E8jrBe3bQ24THRS14I57bOQRMZ55Lj0lB83nzO+WeolBGdlu0KGd X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:17e2:b0:296:3779:813c with SMTP id q89-20020a17090a17e200b002963779813cmr6504495pja.4.1707016278986; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:11:18 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=0; AJvYcCVzR7hi5WM5nw9LaiP+Ix1SnjAyaZWBh8NaFdwA6BLv2FwdR/AUj/+M5eCWX0EQVYaPyN39+RXrUfByI0ST/ePJETynEugUz4p5XLd5USeD2fjh0VFfPkup7Jug8KdywlviXnNuiBzWbOaUTyVrrWdQBrSu+v9HnnK4fR9hrakRzRVA0Ni9RPnVTCoG6/J5mP+wGIM++byp8K74lCXM+rqaQSqDcKePM58DRq2IrSSM6A== Received: from localhost.localdomain ([112.38.163.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n9-20020a170902d0c900b001d8f82c61cdsm7312pln.231.2024.02.03.19.11.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Feb 2024 19:11:18 -0800 (PST) From: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> To: jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, yangyongpeng1@oppo.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: hustqwj@hust.edu.cn, Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v5] f2fs: fix zoned block device information initialization Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 11:10:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20240204031022.1189-1-qwjhust@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.windows.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1789936495600005518 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1789936721697857523 |
Series |
[v5] f2fs: fix zoned block device information initialization
|
|
Commit Message
Wenjie Qi
Feb. 4, 2024, 3:10 a.m. UTC
If the max open zones of zoned devices are less than
the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to
insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs
are being written at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
fs/f2fs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
Comments
Hi Wenjie,
"max_open_zones < sbi->max_open_zones" seems meaningless, this condition
is false only if "max_open_zones == UINT_MAX"(rarely happen). Although
it doesn't affect the correctness, I think less jmp instruction is better.
On 2/4/2024 11:10 AM, Wenjie Qi wrote:
> max_open_zones < sbi->max_open_zones
1. f2fs_scan_devices call init_blkz_info for each zoned device, is it reasonable that every device need to have 6 open zones at least? 2. we should add all open_zones of every zoned device to sbi->max_open_zones, sbi->max_open_zones will be UINT_MAX or accumulated open_zones. Is it more reasonable? On 2/4/2024 11:10 AM, Wenjie Qi wrote: > If the max open zones of zoned devices are less than > the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to > insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs > are being written at the same time. > > Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + > fs/f2fs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index 543898482f8b..161107f2d3bd 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -1558,6 +1558,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > unsigned int blocks_per_blkz; /* F2FS blocks per zone */ > + unsigned int max_open_zones; /* max open zone resources of the zoned device */ > #endif > > /* for node-related operations */ > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > index 1b718bebfaa1..c6709efbc294 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > @@ -2388,6 +2388,16 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > if (err) > goto restore_opts; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { > + f2fs_err(sbi, > + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", > + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto restore_opts; > + } > +#endif > + > /* flush outstanding errors before changing fs state */ > flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > > @@ -3930,11 +3940,22 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi) > sector_t nr_sectors = bdev_nr_sectors(bdev); > struct f2fs_report_zones_args rep_zone_arg; > u64 zone_sectors; > + unsigned int max_open_zones; > int ret; > > if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) > return 0; > > + max_open_zones = bdev_max_open_zones(bdev); > + if (max_open_zones && (max_open_zones < sbi->max_open_zones)) > + sbi->max_open_zones = max_open_zones; > + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { > + f2fs_err(sbi, > + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", > + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev); > if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) { > f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n"); > @@ -4253,6 +4274,9 @@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > logical_blksize = bdev_logical_block_size(sbi->sb->s_
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 12:53 PM Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng1@oppo.com> wrote: > > 1. f2fs_scan_devices call init_blkz_info for each zoned device, is it > reasonable that every device need to have 6 open zones at least? Because it is possible for all active logs to write to the same zoned device at the same time, each zoned device must have at least the same number of open zone resources as active logs. > 2. we should add all open_zones of every zoned device to > sbi->max_open_zones, sbi->max_open_zones will be UINT_MAX or accumulated > open_zones. Is it more reasonable? I don't think that's right. sbi->max_open_zone is the number of resources that are the least of all zoned devices. Thanks. > > > On 2/4/2024 11:10 AM, Wenjie Qi wrote: > > If the max open zones of zoned devices are less than > > the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to > > insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs > > are being written at the same time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + > > fs/f2fs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > index 543898482f8b..161107f2d3bd 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > @@ -1558,6 +1558,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > > unsigned int blocks_per_blkz; /* F2FS blocks per zone */ > > + unsigned int max_open_zones; /* max open zone resources of the zoned device */ > > #endif > > > > /* for node-related operations */ > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > index 1b718bebfaa1..c6709efbc294 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > @@ -2388,6 +2388,16 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > > if (err) > > goto restore_opts; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED > > + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { > > + f2fs_err(sbi, > > + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", > > + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); > > + err = -EINVAL; > > + goto restore_opts; > > + } > > +#endif > > + > > /* flush outstanding errors before changing fs state */ > > flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); > > > > @@ -3930,11 +3940,22 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi) > > sector_t nr_sectors = bdev_nr_sectors(bdev); > > struct f2fs_report_zones_args rep_zone_arg; > > u64 zone_sectors; > > + unsigned int max_open_zones; > > int ret; > > > > if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) > > return 0; > > > > + max_open_zones = bdev_max_open_zones(bdev); > > + if (max_open_zones && (max_open_zones < sbi->max_open_zones)) > > + sbi->max_open_zones = max_open_zones; > > + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { > > + f2fs_err(sbi, > > + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", > > + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev); > > if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) { > > f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n"); > > @@ -4253,6 +4274,9 @@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > > > logical_blksize = bdev_logical_block_size(sbi->sb->s_
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h index 543898482f8b..161107f2d3bd 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -1558,6 +1558,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED unsigned int blocks_per_blkz; /* F2FS blocks per zone */ + unsigned int max_open_zones; /* max open zone resources of the zoned device */ #endif /* for node-related operations */ diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index 1b718bebfaa1..c6709efbc294 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -2388,6 +2388,16 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) if (err) goto restore_opts; +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { + f2fs_err(sbi, + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); + err = -EINVAL; + goto restore_opts; + } +#endif + /* flush outstanding errors before changing fs state */ flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work); @@ -3930,11 +3940,22 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi) sector_t nr_sectors = bdev_nr_sectors(bdev); struct f2fs_report_zones_args rep_zone_arg; u64 zone_sectors; + unsigned int max_open_zones; int ret; if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) return 0; + max_open_zones = bdev_max_open_zones(bdev); + if (max_open_zones && (max_open_zones < sbi->max_open_zones)) + sbi->max_open_zones = max_open_zones; + if (sbi->max_open_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) { + f2fs_err(sbi, + "zoned: max open zones %u is too small, need at least %u open zones", + sbi->max_open_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs); + return -EINVAL; + } + zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev); if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) { f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n"); @@ -4253,6 +4274,9 @@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) logical_blksize = bdev_logical_block_size(sbi->sb->s_bdev); sbi->aligned_blksize = true; +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED + sbi->max_open_zones = UINT_MAX; +#endif for (i = 0; i < max_devices; i++) { if (i == 0)