From f53c4600d8103a5612e7de6cb8205cad37421074 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 17:44:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Allow sending a const pointer as argument
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
* jit-recording.h: Remove memento_of_get_const::accepts_writes_from.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add test-const-pointer-argument.c.
* jit.dg/test-const-pointer-argument.c: New test.
---
gcc/jit/jit-recording.h | 6 --
gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h | 10 +++
.../jit.dg/test-const-pointer-argument.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-const-pointer-argument.c
@@ -720,12 +720,6 @@ public:
memento_of_get_const (type *other_type)
: decorated_type (other_type) {}
- bool accepts_writes_from (type */*rtype*/) final override
- {
- /* Can't write to a "const". */
- return false;
- }
-
/* Strip off the "const", giving the underlying type. */
type *unqualified () final override { return m_other_type; }
@@ -126,6 +126,13 @@
#undef create_code
#undef verify_code
+/* test-const-pointer-argument.c */
+#define create_code create_code_const_pointer_argument
+#define verify_code verify_code_const_pointer_argument
+#include "test-const-pointer-argument.c"
+#undef create_code
+#undef verify_code
+
/* test-debug-strings.c */
#define create_code create_code_debug_strings
#define verify_code verify_code_debug_strings
@@ -437,6 +444,9 @@ const struct testcase testcases[] = {
{"constants",
create_code_constants,
verify_code_constants},
+ {"const_pointer_argument",
+ create_code_const_pointer_argument,
+ verify_code_const_pointer_argument},
{"debug_strings",
create_code_debug_strings,
verify_code_debug_strings},
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <time.h>
+
+#include "libgccjit.h"
+
+#include "harness.h"
+
+void
+create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
+{
+ /* Let's try to inject the equivalent of:
+
+ int test_ptr(const int* value)
+ {
+ return *foo;
+ }
+
+ int main (void)
+ {
+ int value = 10;
+ const int *ptr = &value;
+ int res = test_ptr (ptr);
+ return res;
+ }
+ */
+ gcc_jit_type *int_type =
+ gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT);
+ gcc_jit_type *int_ptr_type =
+ gcc_jit_type_get_pointer (int_type);
+ gcc_jit_type *const_ptr_type =
+ gcc_jit_type_get_const (int_ptr_type);
+
+ /* Build the test_ptr. */
+ gcc_jit_param *param =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_param (ctxt, NULL, const_ptr_type, "value");
+ gcc_jit_function *test_ptr =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_function (ctxt, NULL,
+ GCC_JIT_FUNCTION_EXPORTED,
+ int_type,
+ "test_ptr",
+ 1, ¶m,
+ 0);
+ gcc_jit_block *block = gcc_jit_function_new_block (test_ptr, NULL);
+ gcc_jit_block_end_with_return (block,
+ NULL,
+ gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue (
+ gcc_jit_rvalue_dereference (gcc_jit_param_as_rvalue (param), NULL)));
+
+ /* Build main. */
+ gcc_jit_function *main =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_function (ctxt, NULL,
+ GCC_JIT_FUNCTION_EXPORTED,
+ int_type,
+ "main",
+ 0, NULL,
+ 0);
+ gcc_jit_block *main_block = gcc_jit_function_new_block (main, NULL);
+ gcc_jit_lvalue *variable =
+ gcc_jit_function_new_local (main, NULL, int_type, "value");
+ gcc_jit_lvalue *pointer =
+ gcc_jit_function_new_local (main, NULL, const_ptr_type, "ptr");
+ gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (main_block, NULL, pointer,
+ gcc_jit_lvalue_get_address (variable, NULL));
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *ptr_rvalue = gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue (pointer);
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *res =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_call (ctxt, NULL, test_ptr, 1, &ptr_rvalue);
+ gcc_jit_block_end_with_return (main_block, NULL, res);
+}
+
+void
+verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
+{
+ CHECK_NON_NULL (result);
+}
--
2.43.0