[v6.8,2/2] nvmem: drop nvmem_layout_get_match_data()
Commit Message
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
DT node.
All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 23 deletions(-)
Comments
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
> with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
> DT node.
>
> All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
Isn't device_get_match_data() preferred?
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
-michael
On 19.12.2023 13:21, Michael Walle wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
>> with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
>> DT node.
>>
>> All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
>
> Isn't device_get_match_data() preferred?
You're right. I think a big crusade against of_device_get_match_data()
is still ahead of us but I'll make sure to use device_get_match_data()
in U-Boot env layout to shine as an example :)
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Thank you for quick reviews!
Hi Rafał,
zajec5@gmail.com wrote on Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:01:04 +0100:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> Thanks for layouts refactoring we now have "struct device" associated
> with layout. Also its OF pointer points directly to the "nvmem-layout"
> DT node.
>
> All it takes to get match data is a generic of_device_get_match_data().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
@@ -876,19 +876,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_unregister);
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- struct device_node __maybe_unused *layout_np;
- const struct of_device_id *match;
-
- layout_np = of_nvmem_layout_get_container(nvmem);
- match = of_match_node(layout->dev.driver->of_match_table, layout_np);
-
- return match ? match->data : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_layout_get_match_data);
-
/**
* nvmem_register() - Register a nvmem device for given nvmem_config.
* Also creates a binary entry in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/dev-name/nvmem
@@ -205,9 +205,6 @@ void nvmem_layout_driver_unregister(struct nvmem_layout_driver *drv);
module_driver(__nvmem_layout_driver, nvmem_layout_driver_register, \
nvmem_layout_driver_unregister)
-const void *nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout);
-
#else
static inline struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *c)
@@ -238,13 +235,6 @@ static inline int nvmem_layout_register(struct nvmem_layout *layout)
static inline void nvmem_layout_unregister(struct nvmem_layout *layout) {}
-static inline const void *
-nvmem_layout_get_match_data(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
- struct nvmem_layout *layout)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_NVMEM */
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)