[v2] tracing: Fix infinite loop in tracing_read_pipe on overflowed print_trace_line

Message ID 20221118102521.62362-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com
State New
Headers
Series [v2] tracing: Fix infinite loop in tracing_read_pipe on overflowed print_trace_line |

Commit Message

Yang Jihong Nov. 18, 2022, 10:25 a.m. UTC
  print_trace_line may overflow seq_file buffer. If the event is not
consumed, the while loop keeps peeking this event, causing a infinite loop.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---

Changes since v1:
  - Print partial line to show the broken trace event when overflowed print_trace_line

 kernel/trace/trace.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Steven Rostedt Nov. 20, 2022, 7:38 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:25:21 +0800
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> wrote:

> print_trace_line may overflow seq_file buffer. If the event is not
> consumed, the while loop keeps peeking this event, causing a infinite loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Print partial line to show the broken trace event when overflowed print_trace_line
> 
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 47a44b055a1d..81c36dc80212 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -6786,7 +6786,32 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
>  
>  		ret = print_trace_line(iter);
>  		if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE) {
> -			/* don't print partial lines */
> +			/*
> +			 * If one trace_line of the tracer overflows seq_file
> +			 * buffer, trace_seq_to_user returns -EBUSY.
> +			 * In this case, we need to consume, otherwise,
> +			 * while loop will peek this event next time,
> +			 * resulting in an infinite loop.
> +			 */
> +			if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(&iter->seq)) {

We need to only do this if save_len is zero. Because the reason that it
returns TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE is usually because it overflowed.

This loops until the trace_seq is full, so it's OK to have it overflow.
The case I believe you are fixing, is the case were one
print_trace_line() actually fills the entire trace_seq in one shot. In
which case, it will never print, and in that case, save_len will be zero.

-- Steve


> +				/*
> +				 * Print the partial line,
> +				 * that way we can see the broken trace event.
> +				 */
> +				char dots[] = "...\n";
> +
> +				iter->seq.full = 0;
> +				if (seq_buf_buffer_left(&iter->seq.seq) < strlen(dots)) {
> +					iter->seq.seq.len =
> +						seq_buf_used(&iter->seq.seq) - strlen(dots);
> +				}
> +				trace_seq_puts(&iter->seq, dots);
> +
> +				trace_consume(iter);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* In other cases, don't print partial lines */
>  			iter->seq.seq.len = save_len;
>  			break;
>  		}
  
Yang Jihong Nov. 21, 2022, 8:19 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello,

On 2022/11/21 3:38, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:25:21 +0800
> Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> print_trace_line may overflow seq_file buffer. If the event is not
>> consumed, the while loop keeps peeking this event, causing a infinite loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>    - Print partial line to show the broken trace event when overflowed print_trace_line
>>
>>   kernel/trace/trace.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index 47a44b055a1d..81c36dc80212 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -6786,7 +6786,32 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
>>   
>>   		ret = print_trace_line(iter);
>>   		if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE) {
>> -			/* don't print partial lines */
>> +			/*
>> +			 * If one trace_line of the tracer overflows seq_file
>> +			 * buffer, trace_seq_to_user returns -EBUSY.
>> +			 * In this case, we need to consume, otherwise,
>> +			 * while loop will peek this event next time,
>> +			 * resulting in an infinite loop.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(&iter->seq)) {
> 
> We need to only do this if save_len is zero. Because the reason that it
> returns TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE is usually because it overflowed.
> 
> This loops until the trace_seq is full, so it's OK to have it overflow.
> The case I believe you are fixing, is the case were one
> print_trace_line() actually fills the entire trace_seq in one shot. In
> which case, it will never print, and in that case, save_len will be zero.
> 
Yes, I'm fixing the situation you mentioned.
For the sake of discussion, I've replied in the v1 patch to see if it's 
just add "trace_seq_puts(&iter->seq, "[LINE TOO BIG]\n");" or a more 
complex situation.

Thanks,
Yang
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 47a44b055a1d..81c36dc80212 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6786,7 +6786,32 @@  tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
 
 		ret = print_trace_line(iter);
 		if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE) {
-			/* don't print partial lines */
+			/*
+			 * If one trace_line of the tracer overflows seq_file
+			 * buffer, trace_seq_to_user returns -EBUSY.
+			 * In this case, we need to consume, otherwise,
+			 * while loop will peek this event next time,
+			 * resulting in an infinite loop.
+			 */
+			if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(&iter->seq)) {
+				/*
+				 * Print the partial line,
+				 * that way we can see the broken trace event.
+				 */
+				char dots[] = "...\n";
+
+				iter->seq.full = 0;
+				if (seq_buf_buffer_left(&iter->seq.seq) < strlen(dots)) {
+					iter->seq.seq.len =
+						seq_buf_used(&iter->seq.seq) - strlen(dots);
+				}
+				trace_seq_puts(&iter->seq, dots);
+
+				trace_consume(iter);
+				break;
+			}
+
+			/* In other cases, don't print partial lines */
 			iter->seq.seq.len = save_len;
 			break;
 		}