[RFC,09/12] riscv: Add support for kernel-mode FPU

Message ID 20231208055501.2916202-10-samuel.holland@sifive.com
State New
Headers
Series Unified cross-architecture kernel-mode FPU API |

Commit Message

Samuel Holland Dec. 8, 2023, 5:54 a.m. UTC
  This is motivated by the amdgpu DRM driver, which needs floating-point
code to support recent hardware. That code is not performance-critical,
so only provide a minimal non-preemptible implementation for now.

Use a similar trick as ARM to force placing floating-point code in a
separate translation unit, so it is not possible for compiler-generated
floating-point code to appear outside kernel_fpu_{begin,end}().

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
---

 arch/riscv/Kconfig                  |  1 +
 arch/riscv/Makefile                 |  3 +++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/fpu.h        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile          |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/kernel_mode_fpu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/fpu.h
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/kernel_mode_fpu.c
  

Comments

Christoph Hellwig Dec. 11, 2023, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #1
> +#ifdef __riscv_f
> +
> +#define kernel_fpu_begin() \
> +	static_assert(false, "floating-point code must use a separate translation unit")
> +#define kernel_fpu_end() kernel_fpu_begin()
> +
> +#else
> +
> +void kernel_fpu_begin(void);
> +void kernel_fpu_end(void);
> +
> +#endif

I'll assume this is related to trick that places code in a separate
translation unit, but I fail to understand it.  Can you add a comment
explaining it?
  
Samuel Holland Dec. 11, 2023, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2023-12-11 10:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +#ifdef __riscv_f
>> +
>> +#define kernel_fpu_begin() \
>> +	static_assert(false, "floating-point code must use a separate translation unit")
>> +#define kernel_fpu_end() kernel_fpu_begin()
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +void kernel_fpu_begin(void);
>> +void kernel_fpu_end(void);
>> +
>> +#endif
> 
> I'll assume this is related to trick that places code in a separate
> translation unit, but I fail to understand it.  Can you add a comment
> explaining it?

Yes, I can add a comment. Here, __riscv_f refers to RISC-V's F extension for
single-precision floating point, which is enabled by CC_FLAGS_FPU.
  

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 95a2a06acc6a..cf0967928e6d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@  config RISCV
 	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
 	select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
 	select ARCH_HAS_KCOV
+	select ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT if FPU
 	select ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB
 	select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
index a74be78678eb..2e719c369210 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@  KBUILD_CFLAGS += -march=$(shell echo $(riscv-march-y) | sed -E 's/(rv32ima|rv64i
 
 KBUILD_AFLAGS += -march=$(riscv-march-y)
 
+# For C code built with floating-point support, exclude V but keep F and D.
+CC_FLAGS_FPU  := -march=$(shell echo $(riscv-march-y) | sed -E 's/(rv32ima|rv64ima)([^v_]*)v?/\1\2/')
+
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-save-restore
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=$(CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET)
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/fpu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fpu.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8cd027acc015
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fpu.h
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 SiFive
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FPU_H
+#define _ASM_RISCV_FPU_H
+
+#include <asm/switch_to.h>
+
+#define kernel_fpu_available()	has_fpu()
+
+#ifdef __riscv_f
+
+#define kernel_fpu_begin() \
+	static_assert(false, "floating-point code must use a separate translation unit")
+#define kernel_fpu_end() kernel_fpu_begin()
+
+#else
+
+void kernel_fpu_begin(void);
+void kernel_fpu_end(void);
+
+#endif
+
+#endif /* ! _ASM_RISCV_FPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
index fee22a3d1b53..662c483e338d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)	+= traps_misaligned.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPU)		+= fpu.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_FPU)		+= kernel_mode_fpu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V)	+= vector.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= smpboot.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= smp.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/kernel_mode_fpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/kernel_mode_fpu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9b2024cc056b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/kernel_mode_fpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 SiFive
+ */
+
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+
+#include <asm/csr.h>
+#include <asm/fpu.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/switch_to.h>
+
+void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
+{
+	preempt_disable();
+	fstate_save(current, task_pt_regs(current));
+	csr_set(CSR_SSTATUS, SR_FS);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_fpu_begin);
+
+void kernel_fpu_end(void)
+{
+	csr_clear(CSR_SSTATUS, SR_FS);
+	fstate_restore(current, task_pt_regs(current));
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_fpu_end);