[v5,5/9] tty: serial: amba-pl011: avoid quoted string split across lines
Commit Message
Remove all instances of quoted strings split across lines. Fix four
checkpatch warnings:
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file \
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
WARNING: quoted string split across lines
[...]
Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Remove all instances of quoted strings split across lines. Fix four
> checkpatch warnings:
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file \
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
> [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 3:07 PM Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Remove all instances of quoted strings split across lines. Fix four
> checkpatch warnings:
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file \
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
> [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Le 30/11/2023 à 15:07, Théo Lebrun a écrit :
> Remove all instances of quoted strings split across lines. Fix four
> checkpatch warnings:
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file \
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
> [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index 743dee75c68b..be8888db1a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
> /* Switch buffer & re-trigger DMA job */
> dmarx->use_buf_b = !dmarx->use_buf_b;
> if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
> - dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
> - "fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> + dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> + "could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
> pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
> }
> @@ -1021,8 +1021,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_callback(void *data)
> * get some IRQ immediately from RX.
> */
> if (ret) {
> - dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
> - "fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> + dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> + "could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
> pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
> }
> @@ -1158,8 +1158,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_startup(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
>
> if (uap->using_rx_dma) {
> if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap))
> - dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger initial "
> - "RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> + dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> + "could not trigger initial RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
> if (uap->dmarx.poll_rate) {
Hi,
I think that having a comma just before "fall back", as done here, would
make the other 3 messages clearer.
CJ
> timer_setup(&uap->dmarx.timer, pl011_dma_rx_poll, 0);
> mod_timer(&uap->dmarx.timer,
> @@ -1391,8 +1391,8 @@ __acquires(&uap->port.lock)
> */
> if (pl011_dma_rx_available(uap)) {
> if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
> - dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger RX DMA job "
> - "fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
> + dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
> + "could not trigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
> uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
> pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
> } else {
>
@@ -973,8 +973,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
/* Switch buffer & re-trigger DMA job */
dmarx->use_buf_b = !dmarx->use_buf_b;
if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
- dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
- "fall back to interrupt mode\n");
+ dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
+ "could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
}
@@ -1021,8 +1021,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_callback(void *data)
* get some IRQ immediately from RX.
*/
if (ret) {
- dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not retrigger RX DMA job "
- "fall back to interrupt mode\n");
+ dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
+ "could not retrigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode\n");
uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
}
@@ -1158,8 +1158,8 @@ static void pl011_dma_startup(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
if (uap->using_rx_dma) {
if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap))
- dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger initial "
- "RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
+ dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
+ "could not trigger initial RX DMA job, fall back to interrupt mode\n");
if (uap->dmarx.poll_rate) {
timer_setup(&uap->dmarx.timer, pl011_dma_rx_poll, 0);
mod_timer(&uap->dmarx.timer,
@@ -1391,8 +1391,8 @@ __acquires(&uap->port.lock)
*/
if (pl011_dma_rx_available(uap)) {
if (pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(uap)) {
- dev_dbg(uap->port.dev, "could not trigger RX DMA job "
- "fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
+ dev_dbg(uap->port.dev,
+ "could not trigger RX DMA job fall back to interrupt mode again\n");
uap->im |= UART011_RXIM;
pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
} else {