Message ID | 20221117073603.2598882-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:f944:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id q4csp257846wrr; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 23:22:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5tp3Y6JJrnHFiYYuJBBcBLFTRKUILc8QsOMJMbKhCD8tiiqq8JCLSCMQwExQjrRLUwYZ69 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:583:b0:78d:9e18:b8f7 with SMTP id 3-20020a170906058300b0078d9e18b8f7mr1007326ejn.657.1668669754407; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 23:22:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668669754; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SM0xIoJ2HsAbkVx9Bl8py6tDKoyoawdw/EPleoA9b7HCYlSIzvvmqlHIc7RI6I4dbC wT+VEMPmzShIDQcvtk1tWlHv21AoF/pYg3/Zu5UbAELZTQq+1Je9/xlHW0LukbuamdM/ Y4g6h+Xqoocf9Vp6FfPdzsbdRpxUFP8g+FWkcWKzEFlO0mo6f3UCZMtTH6mEXWrnxl7B p4crjIISB1CIbuwZtoyoWb/uwEc2Pgh5X4WFe+dAKv0rmY1QjjXfHhe8mFRml0qSWThP 3qvWuOr92GOm80qHJDgqM86Y1zzI/QuNalhAbUwbE1ZNC3zGAQG+1AYkjWEh7A67zY4I wiug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=arrV9TxWYBhl64gwyk5bq+9sT7CLrT0DQUqO+RwOjPM=; b=twzl7V3OSNnMxH8FpFUVgJNF0m8Qi/ujQArYhs9nDyptk04RwH9Xg+3sleG04J+gPk LBww2/3f90bEe4fHznPvMm2sZ3viyBDtHwS9o1S+n97DWC+EoeHp3How8yvhFym1F+Mi ywiJzPbeO04MQO3qKQZUViZMDJiEwXoOKz+KiSJljZ3rQ5e2cSWk2m+TxkdlF6QN+GsG 6ifNJ6Gv76J2LXMTCdHtsJry+0zEXNvYPbZQ5HCs7ssB6PNguLgiZFMPFcQPblKfVuen ObQbkHFZ1xEEKxpatVeencWZ8k135lgDjtKK4BUkhCtdLuBULZnrjVi69QeeA7uuhR+R 3sWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e14-20020a17090658ce00b007aea5ae39b1si16813745ejs.443.2022.11.16.23.22.11; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 23:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239119AbiKQHOs (ORCPT <rfc822;just.gull.subs@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:14:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52764 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230114AbiKQHOq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 17 Nov 2022 02:14:46 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF24C25C71; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 23:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NCWPn4sGSz4f3m6Y; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:14:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgDXgK9g33VjzCGGAg--.707S4; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:14:40 +0800 (CST) From: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com> To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>, syzbot+57b25da729eb0b88177d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix uninit-value in 'ext4_evict_inode' Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:36:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20221117073603.2598882-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgDXgK9g33VjzCGGAg--.707S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGrWxuFWxGr4UAr17Ww1ftFb_yoWrGFyUp3 9xJryfZF1UuryDC3yxKr4vqFy8ZasxWFWUGr4fKr1DZFy7Xw1agFyktF45W3WfuFWrCryr XF1DAr4UZr4rA3DanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkYb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1S6rWUM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x 0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG 6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFV Cjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxkF7I0En4kS14v26r1q6r43MxAIw28IcxkI 7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxV Cjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY 6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6x AIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr1j6rW3Jr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280 aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUbmii3UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: p1hex046kxt4xhlfz01xgou0bp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1749727056585518736?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1749727056585518736?= |
Series |
ext4: fix uninit-value in 'ext4_evict_inode'
|
|
Commit Message
Ye Bin
Nov. 17, 2022, 7:36 a.m. UTC
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Syzbot found the following issue: ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 evict+0x365/0x9a0 fs/inode.c:664 iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline] iput+0x985/0xdd0 fs/inode.c:1773 __ext4_new_inode+0xe54/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1361 ext4_mknod+0x376/0x840 fs/ext4/namei.c:2844 vfs_mknod+0x79d/0x830 fs/namei.c:3914 do_mknodat+0x47d/0xaa0 __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3992 [inline] __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3989 [inline] __ia32_sys_mknodat+0xeb/0x150 fs/namei.c:3989 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 Uninit was created at: __alloc_pages+0x9f1/0xe80 mm/page_alloc.c:5578 alloc_pages+0xaae/0xd80 mm/mempolicy.c:2285 alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:1794 [inline] allocate_slab+0x1b5/0x1010 mm/slub.c:1939 new_slab mm/slub.c:1992 [inline] ___slab_alloc+0x10c3/0x2d60 mm/slub.c:3180 __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3279 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3364 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3406 [inline] __kmem_cache_alloc_lru mm/slub.c:3413 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x6f3/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3429 alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3117 [inline] ext4_alloc_inode+0x5f/0x860 fs/ext4/super.c:1321 alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:259 new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1018 [inline] new_inode+0x3b/0x430 fs/inode.c:1046 __ext4_new_inode+0x2a7/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:959 ext4_mkdir+0x4d5/0x1560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2992 vfs_mkdir+0x62a/0x870 fs/namei.c:4035 do_mkdirat+0x466/0x7b0 fs/namei.c:4060 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4075 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4073 [inline] __ia32_sys_mkdirat+0xc4/0x120 fs/namei.c:4073 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 CPU: 1 PID: 4625 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-syzkaller-62821-gcb231e2f67ec #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 ===================================================== Now, 'ext4_alloc_inode()' didn't init 'ei->i_flags'. If new inode failed before set 'ei->i_flags' in '__ext4_new_inode()', then do 'iput()'. As after 6bc0d63dad7f commit will access 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_evict_inode()' which will lead to access uninit-value. To solve above issue just init 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_alloc_inode()'. Reported-by: syzbot+57b25da729eb0b88177d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes:6bc0d63dad7f("ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/super.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Comments
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:36:03PM +0800, Ye Bin wrote: > From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > > Syzbot found the following issue: > ===================================================== > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 > ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 > evict+0x365/0x9a0 fs/inode.c:664 > iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline] > iput+0x985/0xdd0 fs/inode.c:1773 > __ext4_new_inode+0xe54/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1361 > ext4_mknod+0x376/0x840 fs/ext4/namei.c:2844 > vfs_mknod+0x79d/0x830 fs/namei.c:3914 > do_mknodat+0x47d/0xaa0 > __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3992 [inline] > __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3989 [inline] > __ia32_sys_mknodat+0xeb/0x150 fs/namei.c:3989 > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] > __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 > do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 > do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 > > Uninit was created at: > __alloc_pages+0x9f1/0xe80 mm/page_alloc.c:5578 > alloc_pages+0xaae/0xd80 mm/mempolicy.c:2285 > alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:1794 [inline] > allocate_slab+0x1b5/0x1010 mm/slub.c:1939 > new_slab mm/slub.c:1992 [inline] > ___slab_alloc+0x10c3/0x2d60 mm/slub.c:3180 > __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3279 [inline] > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3364 [inline] > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3406 [inline] > __kmem_cache_alloc_lru mm/slub.c:3413 [inline] > kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x6f3/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3429 > alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3117 [inline] > ext4_alloc_inode+0x5f/0x860 fs/ext4/super.c:1321 > alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:259 > new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1018 [inline] > new_inode+0x3b/0x430 fs/inode.c:1046 > __ext4_new_inode+0x2a7/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:959 > ext4_mkdir+0x4d5/0x1560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2992 > vfs_mkdir+0x62a/0x870 fs/namei.c:4035 > do_mkdirat+0x466/0x7b0 fs/namei.c:4060 > __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4075 [inline] > __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4073 [inline] > __ia32_sys_mkdirat+0xc4/0x120 fs/namei.c:4073 > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] > __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 > do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 > do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 > > CPU: 1 PID: 4625 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-syzkaller-62821-gcb231e2f67ec #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 > ===================================================== > > Now, 'ext4_alloc_inode()' didn't init 'ei->i_flags'. If new inode failed > before set 'ei->i_flags' in '__ext4_new_inode()', then do 'iput()'. As after > 6bc0d63dad7f commit will access 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_evict_inode()' which > will lead to access uninit-value. > To solve above issue just init 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_alloc_inode()'. > > Reported-by: syzbot+57b25da729eb0b88177d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Fixes:6bc0d63dad7f("ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction") > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index ae433e1337ed..cd2590489392 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) > return NULL; > > inode_set_iversion(&ei->vfs_inode, 1); > + ei->i_flags = 0; > spin_lock_init(&ei->i_raw_lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_prealloc_list); > atomic_set(&ei->i_prealloc_active, 0); Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> I'm seeing this when running xfstests on a kernel with KMSAN enabled, so it would be nice to get this fixed. - Eric
On Thu 17-11-22 15:36:03, Ye Bin wrote: > From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> > > Syzbot found the following issue: > ===================================================== > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 > ext4_evict_inode+0xdd/0x26b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:180 > evict+0x365/0x9a0 fs/inode.c:664 > iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline] > iput+0x985/0xdd0 fs/inode.c:1773 > __ext4_new_inode+0xe54/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1361 > ext4_mknod+0x376/0x840 fs/ext4/namei.c:2844 > vfs_mknod+0x79d/0x830 fs/namei.c:3914 > do_mknodat+0x47d/0xaa0 > __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3992 [inline] > __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:3989 [inline] > __ia32_sys_mknodat+0xeb/0x150 fs/namei.c:3989 > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] > __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 > do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 > do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 > > Uninit was created at: > __alloc_pages+0x9f1/0xe80 mm/page_alloc.c:5578 > alloc_pages+0xaae/0xd80 mm/mempolicy.c:2285 > alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:1794 [inline] > allocate_slab+0x1b5/0x1010 mm/slub.c:1939 > new_slab mm/slub.c:1992 [inline] > ___slab_alloc+0x10c3/0x2d60 mm/slub.c:3180 > __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3279 [inline] > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3364 [inline] > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3406 [inline] > __kmem_cache_alloc_lru mm/slub.c:3413 [inline] > kmem_cache_alloc_lru+0x6f3/0xb30 mm/slub.c:3429 > alloc_inode_sb include/linux/fs.h:3117 [inline] > ext4_alloc_inode+0x5f/0x860 fs/ext4/super.c:1321 > alloc_inode+0x83/0x440 fs/inode.c:259 > new_inode_pseudo fs/inode.c:1018 [inline] > new_inode+0x3b/0x430 fs/inode.c:1046 > __ext4_new_inode+0x2a7/0x7ec0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:959 > ext4_mkdir+0x4d5/0x1560 fs/ext4/namei.c:2992 > vfs_mkdir+0x62a/0x870 fs/namei.c:4035 > do_mkdirat+0x466/0x7b0 fs/namei.c:4060 > __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4075 [inline] > __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4073 [inline] > __ia32_sys_mkdirat+0xc4/0x120 fs/namei.c:4073 > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] > __do_fast_syscall_32+0xa2/0x100 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 > do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 > do_SYSENTER_32+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/entry/common.c:246 > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 > > CPU: 1 PID: 4625 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-syzkaller-62821-gcb231e2f67ec #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 > ===================================================== > > Now, 'ext4_alloc_inode()' didn't init 'ei->i_flags'. If new inode failed > before set 'ei->i_flags' in '__ext4_new_inode()', then do 'iput()'. As after > 6bc0d63dad7f commit will access 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_evict_inode()' which > will lead to access uninit-value. > To solve above issue just init 'ei->i_flags' in 'ext4_alloc_inode()'. > > Reported-by: syzbot+57b25da729eb0b88177d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Fixes:6bc0d63dad7f("ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction") Some spaces are missing in the above tag. Should be like: Fixes: 6bc0d63dad7f ("ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction") > Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Nice catch. Thanks for fixing this! Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/super.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index ae433e1337ed..cd2590489392 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) > return NULL; > > inode_set_iversion(&ei->vfs_inode, 1); > + ei->i_flags = 0; > spin_lock_init(&ei->i_raw_lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_prealloc_list); > atomic_set(&ei->i_prealloc_active, 0); > -- > 2.31.1 >
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index ae433e1337ed..cd2590489392 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) return NULL; inode_set_iversion(&ei->vfs_inode, 1); + ei->i_flags = 0; spin_lock_init(&ei->i_raw_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_prealloc_list); atomic_set(&ei->i_prealloc_active, 0);