[v6,15/20] sched: Add proxy deactivate helper
Commit Message
Add small helper for deactivating the selected task
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi John,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on v6.6]
[cannot apply to tip/sched/core tip/master linus/master tip/auto-latest next-20231107]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/John-Stultz/sched-Unify-runtime-accounting-across-classes/20231107-033946
base: tip/locking/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231106193524.866104-16-jstultz%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 15/20] sched: Add proxy deactivate helper
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/202311081028.yDLmCWgr-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/202311081028.yDLmCWgr-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311081028.yDLmCWgr-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/sched/core.c:6616:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'proxy_deactivate' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
6616 | bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/proxy_deactivate +6616 kernel/sched/core.c
6615
> 6616 bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
6617 {
6618 unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(next->__state);
6619
6620 /* Don't deactivate if the state has been changed to TASK_RUNNING */
6621 if (!state)
6622 return false;
6623 if (!try_to_deactivate_task(rq, next, state, true))
6624 return false;
6625 put_prev_task(rq, next);
6626 rq_set_selected(rq, rq->idle);
6627 resched_curr(rq);
6628 return true;
6629 }
6630
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
...
> >> kernel/sched/core.c:6616:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'proxy_deactivate' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 6616 | bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you! I've fixed this up for v7
thanks again
-john
@@ -6612,6 +6612,22 @@ static bool try_to_deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROXY_EXEC
+
+bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
+{
+ unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(next->__state);
+
+ /* Don't deactivate if the state has been changed to TASK_RUNNING */
+ if (!state)
+ return false;
+ if (!try_to_deactivate_task(rq, next, state, true))
+ return false;
+ put_prev_task(rq, next);
+ rq_set_selected(rq, rq->idle);
+ resched_curr(rq);
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Initial simple proxy that just returns the task if its waking
* or deactivates the blocked task so we can pick something that
@@ -6620,10 +6636,9 @@ static bool try_to_deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
static struct task_struct *
proxy(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
+ struct task_struct *ret = NULL;
struct task_struct *p = next;
struct mutex *mutex;
- unsigned long state;
-
mutex = p->blocked_on;
/* Something changed in the chain, pick_again */
if (!mutex)
@@ -6645,30 +6660,14 @@ proxy(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf)
*/
raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
- /* Don't deactivate if the state has been changed to TASK_RUNNING */
- if (!state) {
- raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
- raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
- return p;
+ return ret;
}
- try_to_deactivate_task(rq, next, state, true);
-
- /*
- * If next is the selected task, then remove lingering
- * references to it from rq and sched_class structs after
- * dequeueing.
- */
- put_prev_task(rq, next);
- rq_set_selected(rq, rq->idle);
- resched_curr(rq);
+ if (!proxy_deactivate(rq, next))
+ ret = p;
raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
- return NULL;
+ return ret;
}
#else /* PROXY_EXEC */
static struct task_struct *