Message ID | 20231018162540.667646-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:612c:2908:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id ib8csp4913039vqb; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEfKFyJo8ENrHg/fkM5I2ig1QF/yQZtrpLp4RTcdr3Rr+9P26yvaOL4RbRqVYbjbFqSsSU4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:450f:b0:1e9:ee04:d25 with SMTP id e15-20020a056870450f00b001e9ee040d25mr6784675oao.59.1697646408191; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1697646408; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sxHsUW/X4Um8gQaf6rwjj3X915Vzh9ojD6/1g6BLQzwcYahUSt3Ehg4lztjWsYl1PV lyX2IBDrwIejnTRMML0CtaXh07CFUXKB9ru/e4dC6pWY6aWc4xj/LPytteFkjbcx5Kc3 optHW7A8hV6qEYjyT3b+ZLbHAIVlepRxmEJGxkWesuMf2wft/EFO4tF4b6Upd2PsUvnF 1IFMP1OLwnAgDVDW2LB2OuJlrMQMpfnpaHgS1vtXWrx4bRlIcOD+QBjvvlEOFKwWS7wA ALnEGjZAydu6k2gYNo3QpPVjPEXfvXyYNrQ4NQ4SQdKrh2vePajAE7cPfdh9OZQlgpGJ 4O/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=Nf9NNvnyBz0qVw4ihr1xxMPaiT6voh2eHkh7WwYLcYs=; fh=aqXlZKEuqBn32GiqXwfBTBEPXMVE+dzbtwpLcW+Wljc=; b=HI4Sj1LwPtHv+DakvsowXz+oeDY3Q44x9SLex6GxJWi/W8bAyM0igcQ0zyXGhbvKSM uR/YNah/OhTidy3uopmrKQxZfabgAI8c0EXHaayo2x5WoHfW4bSlK0tJW+qNF1nYnorp dahcrfwqkfUP5JinaoFwzVDcUAQsnes7diasDoiwZTMQ3FH/90X+P45y7Xq7sk4U1xNW fpCr60TAoEsmyIsj91KqAkoqvKDUOEBc3rrj0hKTxRmLb+SHDS5YWVvWAAT46O49ms9K B5nXviCCHk/U9a2DEm6pVVas/wQJQkoq+YBoPhwuD+fejrg7cb2IWeL//O5lJ0SzPem0 Rk5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=CoNnRigi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: from groat.vger.email (groat.vger.email. [23.128.96.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bv67-20020a632e46000000b005abe19be7e9si2420602pgb.543.2023.10.18.09.26.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=CoNnRigi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by groat.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F42802932D; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:26:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at groat.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230201AbjJRQ0F (ORCPT <rfc822;zwp10758@gmail.com> + 24 others); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:26:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231666AbjJRQZy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:25:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8FD122 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40572aeb673so65348555e9.0 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1697646350; x=1698251150; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Nf9NNvnyBz0qVw4ihr1xxMPaiT6voh2eHkh7WwYLcYs=; b=CoNnRigizr3IP9cj+U0SDs2SU1FDhpff+aCc1fE6A19iMHqHbp/wqt3EkcSAOxfwV5 +LNJd7LUtPL2HNJmaBJCHW+XdBG4mB5G21GHR3SPMbPPkgJ3TYI8qrgHg9OHQ7Xv0VWM aPCK9w3bJ8nffA7ksPnZ7HD5IK/iS/bwEfoA/XipP6ebW+k/5aEiEJ9P9beVeto3ffsc llrgAZbMYavkLi7Nt0dlguAezVoBOFBT5+PRU1roZWrQab7Hin6fg/ZONB9LERi76Qsn lZDN/5C350byg4jTZV7uwxDUitI91nwuqsILiYOPw+mgex+d56Iv1c+WviSZA76mRda8 c7xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697646350; x=1698251150; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Nf9NNvnyBz0qVw4ihr1xxMPaiT6voh2eHkh7WwYLcYs=; b=AYH1MlfZBoe/4tcM4sXMfymH+p0h1prPXqE6OC3qk0ZjW3tD/yMgPPdhGM30iTLtlQ a0TV0iL8ewaja17t1+wFcpvcS7KoL1u2vVeo+8Zfhg0DjrUeafwKbU5H4qQrYg5+8mpa NItWdgWG09N5I/9Lqyca22GFsNvgCt22h5K33k4r0dpxzHkKD/uPULCGwWMO8bJh14sy rkdTCwhVcmal/xP5G5Pu+rvqBLqnjQL9C3kX0WbqKlIFYeN1LTWA1xAQZdu5mdvumkCz xUFqnAbvreMcA2zWNZ/7wxBpmACsXlsjW1NY75WEEmxsUWZ6C0HSWolGL9zuQ1beKuh6 AVfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzovAgzwdRfYT5ofdNvlDrsU0rc+9fqltldvGqOTeXPc6+uBSGH 7FkqupCsDw1nj55S49Uc4jDPEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1990:b0:406:177e:5df7 with SMTP id t16-20020a05600c199000b00406177e5df7mr4970619wmq.29.1697646349667; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vingu-book.. ([2a01:e0a:f:6020:fcf4:9d83:8d0d:39aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12-20020a05600c2e4c00b0040648217f4fsm2033503wmf.39.2023.10.18.09.25.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> To: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org Cc: conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq/schedutil: use a fixed reference frequency Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:25:37 +0200 Message-Id: <20231018162540.667646-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20231018162540.667646-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> References: <20231018162540.667646-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on groat.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (groat.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:26:46 -0700 (PDT) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1780111279752191795 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1780111279752191795 |
Series |
consolidate and cleanup CPU capacity
|
|
Commit Message
Vincent Guittot
Oct. 18, 2023, 4:25 p.m. UTC
cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This implies that the value could be different than the one that has been used when computing the capacity of a CPU. The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent reference frequency that can be used when computing a frequency based on utilization. Use this arch_scale_freq_ref() when available and fallback to policy otherwise. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:25 PM Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote: > > cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This > implies that the value could be different than the one that has been > used when computing the capacity of a CPU. > > The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent reference > frequency that can be used when computing a frequency based on utilization. > > Use this arch_scale_freq_ref() when available and fallback to > policy otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> > > --- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index 458d359f5991..6e4030482ae8 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -114,6 +114,28 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) > } > } > > +/** > + * cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq - get the reference frequency of a given CPU that > + * has been used to correlate frequency and compute capacity. > + * @policy: the cpufreq policy of the CPU in question. > + * @use_current: Fallback to current freq instead of policy->cpuinfo.max_freq. > + * > + * Return: the reference CPU frequency to compute a capacity. > + */ > +static __always_inline > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); > + > + if (freq) > + return freq; > + > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > + > + return policy->cur; > +} > + > /** > * get_next_freq - Compute a new frequency for a given cpufreq policy. > * @sg_policy: schedutil policy object to compute the new frequency for. > @@ -140,10 +162,10 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, > unsigned long util, unsigned long max) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; > - unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? > - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur; > + unsigned int freq; > > util = map_util_perf(util); > + freq = get_capacity_ref_freq(policy); > freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max); > > if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update) > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:25:37PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > +static __always_inline > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); > + > + if (freq) > + return freq; > + > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > + > + return policy->cur; > +} Hmm, what should x86 do here? I know it mostly doesn't use these things, but would it make sense to stick the base frequency in ?
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 13:53, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 06:25:37PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > +static __always_inline > > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > +{ > > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); > > + > > + if (freq) > > + return freq; > > + > > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) > > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > + > > + return policy->cur; > > +} > > Hmm, what should x86 do here? I know it mostly doesn't use these things, > but would it make sense to stick the base frequency in ? get_capacity_ref_freq() should return the frequency that is used as the reference for the max compute capacity. On Arm64, we have seen some inconsistency especially because we use the energy model, we compute the CPU's capacity at boot and we can have different compute capacity in our system whereas x86 always uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE even on hybrid system if I'm not wrong So I was not sure that this will make any difference for x86 platform > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
On 18/10/2023 18:25, Vincent Guittot wrote: > cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This > implies that the value could be different than the one that has been > used when computing the capacity of a CPU. > > The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent reference > frequency that can be used when computing a frequency based on utilization. > > Use this arch_scale_freq_ref() when available and fallback to > policy otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > --- > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index 458d359f5991..6e4030482ae8 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -114,6 +114,28 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) > } > } > > +/** > + * cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq - get the reference frequency of a given CPU that s/cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq/get_capacity_ref_freq s/of a given CPU/for a given cpufreq policy ? (of which the CPU managing it is used for the arch_scale_freq_ref() call in the function. > + * has been used to correlate frequency and compute capacity. > + * @policy: the cpufreq policy of the CPU in question. > + * @use_current: Fallback to current freq instead of policy->cpuinfo.max_freq. Looks like use_current does not exists as a parameter. > + * > + * Return: the reference CPU frequency to compute a capacity. > + */ > +static __always_inline > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > +{ > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); > + > + if (freq) > + return freq; > + > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > + > + return policy->cur; > +} Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 22:13, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote: > > On 18/10/2023 18:25, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This > > implies that the value could be different than the one that has been > > used when computing the capacity of a CPU. > > > > The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent reference > > frequency that can be used when computing a frequency based on utilization. > > > > Use this arch_scale_freq_ref() when available and fallback to > > policy otherwise. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > > > --- > > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > > index 458d359f5991..6e4030482ae8 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > > @@ -114,6 +114,28 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) > > } > > } > > > > +/** > > + * cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq - get the reference frequency of a given CPU that > > s/cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq/get_capacity_ref_freq > > s/of a given CPU/for a given cpufreq policy ? (of which the CPU managing > it is used for the arch_scale_freq_ref() call in the function. > > > + * has been used to correlate frequency and compute capacity. > > + * @policy: the cpufreq policy of the CPU in question. > > + * @use_current: Fallback to current freq instead of policy->cpuinfo.max_freq. > > Looks like use_current does not exists as a parameter. Thanks for the review. I'm going to apply your comments > > > + * > > + * Return: the reference CPU frequency to compute a capacity. > > + */ > > +static __always_inline > > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > +{ > > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); > > + > > + if (freq) > > + return freq; > > + > > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) > > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > + > > + return policy->cur; > > +} > > Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > >
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 458d359f5991..6e4030482ae8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -114,6 +114,28 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) } } +/** + * cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq - get the reference frequency of a given CPU that + * has been used to correlate frequency and compute capacity. + * @policy: the cpufreq policy of the CPU in question. + * @use_current: Fallback to current freq instead of policy->cpuinfo.max_freq. + * + * Return: the reference CPU frequency to compute a capacity. + */ +static __always_inline +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu); + + if (freq) + return freq; + + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant()) + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; + + return policy->cur; +} + /** * get_next_freq - Compute a new frequency for a given cpufreq policy. * @sg_policy: schedutil policy object to compute the new frequency for. @@ -140,10 +162,10 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, unsigned long util, unsigned long max) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; - unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur; + unsigned int freq; util = map_util_perf(util); + freq = get_capacity_ref_freq(policy); freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max); if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update)