diff mbox series

[v3,4/8] riscv: dts: sophgo: Rename cv1800b device tree file

Message ID IA1PR20MB4953267AE83D7E6FED7C06ADBBD5A@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com
State New
Headers
Series Add Huashan Pi board support |

Commit Message

Inochi Amaoto Oct. 18, 2023, 11:31 a.m. UTC 
  As CV180x and CV181x have the identical layouts, it is OK to use the
cv1800b basic device tree for the whole series.

Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} | 0
 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} (100%)

--
2.42.0

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 18, 2023, 12:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 18/10/2023 13:31, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> As CV180x and CV181x have the identical layouts, it is OK to use the
> cv1800b basic device tree for the whole series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} | 0
>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} (100%)
> 

If nothing breaks by this commit, means the file is not used, so how did
it end up in the kernel?


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Inochi Amaoto Oct. 18, 2023, 12:37 p.m. UTC | #2 
>On 18/10/2023 13:31, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>> As CV180x and CV181x have the identical layouts, it is OK to use the
>> cv1800b basic device tree for the whole series.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} | 0
>>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} (100%)
>>
>
>If nothing breaks by this commit, means the file is not used, so how did
>it end up in the kernel?
>

This commit breaks the including file cv1800b-milkv-duo.dts, which is
fixed in the next patch. For cv1800b, it only needs to set compatible
strings. The cv1800b and cv1812h have identical layout.

I use this commit to avoid wired output provided by git and make the
change more clear.

>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
>
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 18, 2023, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 18/10/2023 14:37, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>> On 18/10/2023 13:31, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>> As CV180x and CV181x have the identical layouts, it is OK to use the
>>> cv1800b basic device tree for the whole series.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} | 0
>>>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>  rename arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/{cv1800b.dtsi => cv18xx.dtsi} (100%)
>>>
>>
>> If nothing breaks by this commit, means the file is not used, so how did
>> it end up in the kernel?
>>
> 
> This commit breaks the including file cv1800b-milkv-duo.dts, which is
> fixed in the next patch. For cv1800b, it only needs to set compatible
> strings. The cv1800b and cv1812h have identical layout.

You must preserve bisectability.

> 
> I use this commit to avoid wired output provided by git and make the
> change more clear.

Don't do this. Previous patch was ok and readable. I don't understand
how this split helps (except breaking bisectability).

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx.dtsi
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi
rename to arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx.dtsi