[v2,1/1] serial: 8250_omap: Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe()

Message ID 20231004062650.64487-1-tony@atomide.com
State New
Headers
Series [v2,1/1] serial: 8250_omap: Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() |

Commit Message

Tony Lindgren Oct. 4, 2023, 6:26 a.m. UTC
  Let's drop the use of pm_runtime_irq_safe() for 8250_omap. The use of
pm_runtime_irq_safe() is not nice as it takes a permanent usage count on
the parent device.

We can finally drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() safely as the kernel now knows
when the uart port tx is active. This changed with commit 84a9582fd203
("serial: core: Start managing serial controllers to enable runtime PM").

For serial port rx, we already use Linux generic wakeirqs for 8250_omap.

To drop pm_runtime_irq_safe(), we need to add handling for shallow idle
state where the port hardware may already be awake and an IO interrupt
happens. We also need to replace the serial8250_rpm sync calls in the
interrupt handlers with async runtime PM calls.

Note that omap8250_irq() calls omap_8250_dma_handle_irq(), so we don't
need separate runtime PM calls in omap_8250_dma_handle_irq().

While at it, let's also add the missing line break to the end of
omap8250_runtime_resume() to group the calls.

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---

Changes since v1:

- Fix build warning if CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DMA is not set as reported by
  kernel test robot

---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Andy Shevchenko Oct. 5, 2023, 9:03 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 09:26:48AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Let's drop the use of pm_runtime_irq_safe() for 8250_omap. The use of
> pm_runtime_irq_safe() is not nice as it takes a permanent usage count on
> the parent device.
> 
> We can finally drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() safely as the kernel now knows
> when the uart port tx is active. This changed with commit 84a9582fd203
> ("serial: core: Start managing serial controllers to enable runtime PM").
> 
> For serial port rx, we already use Linux generic wakeirqs for 8250_omap.
> 
> To drop pm_runtime_irq_safe(), we need to add handling for shallow idle
> state where the port hardware may already be awake and an IO interrupt
> happens. We also need to replace the serial8250_rpm sync calls in the
> interrupt handlers with async runtime PM calls.
> 
> Note that omap8250_irq() calls omap_8250_dma_handle_irq(), so we don't
> need separate runtime PM calls in omap_8250_dma_handle_irq().
> 
> While at it, let's also add the missing line break to the end of
> omap8250_runtime_resume() to group the calls.

Yoo-hoo! A few years only to get to the point :-)
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ 
  *
  */
 
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@  struct omap8250_priv {
 
 	u8 tx_trigger;
 	u8 rx_trigger;
+	atomic_t active;
 	bool is_suspending;
 	int wakeirq;
 	int wakeups_enabled;
@@ -632,14 +634,23 @@  static irqreturn_t omap8250_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	unsigned int iir, lsr;
 	int ret;
 
+	pm_runtime_get_noresume(port->dev);
+
+	/* Shallow idle state wake-up to an IO interrupt? */
+	if (atomic_add_unless(&priv->active, 1, 1)) {
+		priv->latency = priv->calc_latency;
+		schedule_work(&priv->qos_work);
+	}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DMA
 	if (up->dma) {
 		ret = omap_8250_dma_handle_irq(port);
+		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(port->dev);
+		pm_runtime_put(port->dev);
 		return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
 	}
 #endif
 
-	serial8250_rpm_get(up);
 	lsr = serial_port_in(port, UART_LSR);
 	iir = serial_port_in(port, UART_IIR);
 	ret = serial8250_handle_irq(port, iir);
@@ -676,7 +687,8 @@  static irqreturn_t omap8250_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		schedule_delayed_work(&up->overrun_backoff, delay);
 	}
 
-	serial8250_rpm_put(up);
+	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(port->dev);
+	pm_runtime_put(port->dev);
 
 	return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
 }
@@ -1270,11 +1282,8 @@  static int omap_8250_dma_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port)
 	u16 status;
 	u8 iir;
 
-	serial8250_rpm_get(up);
-
 	iir = serial_port_in(port, UART_IIR);
 	if (iir & UART_IIR_NO_INT) {
-		serial8250_rpm_put(up);
 		return IRQ_HANDLED;
 	}
 
@@ -1305,7 +1314,6 @@  static int omap_8250_dma_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port)
 
 	uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq(port);
 
-	serial8250_rpm_put(up);
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -1503,8 +1511,6 @@  static int omap8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!of_get_available_child_count(pdev->dev.of_node))
 		pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, -1);
 
-	pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
-
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
 
 	omap_serial_fill_features_erratas(&up, priv);
@@ -1743,6 +1749,7 @@  static int omap8250_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 	priv->latency = PM_QOS_CPU_LATENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE;
 	schedule_work(&priv->qos_work);
+	atomic_set(&priv->active, 0);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1752,6 +1759,10 @@  static int omap8250_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct omap8250_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct uart_8250_port *up = NULL;
 
+	/* Did the hardware wake to a device IO interrupt before a wakeirq? */
+	if (atomic_read(&priv->active))
+		return 0;
+
 	if (priv->line >= 0)
 		up = serial8250_get_port(priv->line);
 
@@ -1767,8 +1778,10 @@  static int omap8250_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 		uart_port_unlock_irq(&up->port);
 	}
 
+	atomic_set(&priv->active, 1);
 	priv->latency = priv->calc_latency;
 	schedule_work(&priv->qos_work);
+
 	return 0;
 }