[RFC,8/8] iommu/vt-d: Add set_dev_pasid callback for nested domain
Commit Message
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
Comments
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 5:27 PM
>
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>
> This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
> device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
pasid can be attached to either user hwpt or kernel hwpt.
We should also introduce a set_dev_pasid callback for non-nest domain ops.
On 2023/9/27 15:52, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 5:27 PM
>>
>> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
>> device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> pasid can be attached to either user hwpt or kernel hwpt.
>
> We should also introduce a set_dev_pasid callback for non-nest domain ops.
We already have the code in Linus' tree. The idxd driver uses it for
kernel DMA with pasid.
Best regards,
baolu
> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 3:58 PM
>
> On 2023/9/27 15:52, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Liu, Yi L<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 5:27 PM
> >>
> >> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
> >> device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > pasid can be attached to either user hwpt or kernel hwpt.
> >
> > We should also introduce a set_dev_pasid callback for non-nest domain
> ops.
>
> We already have the code in Linus' tree. The idxd driver uses it for
> kernel DMA with pasid.
>
ah, I forgot. 😊 probably can mention it in the commit message.
On 2023/9/27 16:09, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 3:58 PM
>>
>> On 2023/9/27 15:52, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Liu, Yi L<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 5:27 PM
>>>>
>>>> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> This allows the upper layers to set a nested type domain to a PASID of a
>>>> device if the PASID feature is supported by the IOMMU hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 47
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>> pasid can be attached to either user hwpt or kernel hwpt.
>>>
>>> We should also introduce a set_dev_pasid callback for non-nest domain
>> ops.
>>
>> We already have the code in Linus' tree. The idxd driver uses it for
>> kernel DMA with pasid.
>>
>
> ah, I forgot. 😊 probably can mention it in the commit message.
sure.
@@ -63,6 +63,52 @@ static int intel_nested_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return 0;
}
+static int intel_nested_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
+{
+ struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+ struct dev_pasid_info *dev_pasid;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!pasid_supported(iommu))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (iommu->agaw < dmar_domain->s2_domain->agaw)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(&dmar_domain->s2_domain->domain, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_pasid = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_pasid), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dev_pasid)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = domain_attach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_free;
+
+ ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, dev, pasid, dmar_domain);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_detach_iommu;
+
+ dev_pasid->dev = dev;
+ dev_pasid->pasid = pasid;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+ list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+err_detach_iommu:
+ domain_detach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
+err_free:
+ kfree(dev_pasid);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void intel_nested_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
kfree(to_dmar_domain(domain));
@@ -127,6 +173,7 @@ static int intel_nested_cache_invalidate_user(struct iommu_domain *domain,
static const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_nested_domain_ops = {
.attach_dev = intel_nested_attach_dev,
+ .set_dev_pasid = intel_nested_set_dev_pasid,
.free = intel_nested_domain_free,
.cache_invalidate_user = intel_nested_cache_invalidate_user,
};