[v2] testsuite: Skip intrinsics test if arm

Message ID 20220920131337.843046-1-torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com
State Accepted, archived
Headers
Series [v2] testsuite: Skip intrinsics test if arm |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patches-check success Github commit url

Commit Message

Torbjorn SVENSSON Sept. 20, 2022, 1:13 p.m. UTC
  In the test cases, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase rather than
XFAIL.
By changing to dg-skip-if, the entire test case is omitted.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Replace
	dg-xfail-if with gd-skip-if.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c: Likewise.

Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Richard Sandiford Sept. 23, 2022, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1
Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> In the test cases, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
> implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
> link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase rather than
> XFAIL.
> By changing to dg-skip-if, the entire test case is omitted.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Replace
> 	dg-xfail-if with gd-skip-if.

Typo: s/gd/dg/

OK with that change, thanks.

Richard

> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c: Likewise.
>
> Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> index 92a139bc523..f933102be47 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>  
>  #include <arm_neon.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> index 6ddd507d9cf..b20dec061b5 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>  
>  #include <arm_neon.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> index 451a0afc6aa..e59f845880e 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>  
>  #include <arm_neon.h>
  
Christophe Lyon Sept. 26, 2022, 7:41 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,


On 9/23/22 19:24, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>> In the test cases, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
>> implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
>> link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase rather than
>> XFAIL.
>> By changing to dg-skip-if, the entire test case is omitted.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Replace
>> 	dg-xfail-if with gd-skip-if.
> 

Since Kyrill explicitly added the dg-xfail for arm in 
r8-6382-gda1f8d7f12c2ef , I am not sure he is OK with making the failure 
disappear?

Christophe

> Typo: s/gd/dg/
> 
> OK with that change, thanks.
> 
> Richard
> 
>> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c: Likewise.
>> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c: Likewise.
>>
>> Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c | 2 +-
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c | 2 +-
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c | 2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
>> index 92a139bc523..f933102be47 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
>> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>>   
>>   #include <arm_neon.h>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
>> index 6ddd507d9cf..b20dec061b5 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
>> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>>   
>>   #include <arm_neon.h>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
>> index 451a0afc6aa..e59f845880e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
>> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-do run } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
>>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>>   
>>   #include <arm_neon.h>
  
Kyrylo Tkachov Sept. 26, 2022, 8:17 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lyon <Christophe.Lyon@arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 8:41 AM
> To: Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>;
> Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>; Richard Sandiford
> <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Skip intrinsics test if arm
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 9/23/22 19:24, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> >> In the test cases, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
> >> implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
> >> link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase rather than
> >> XFAIL.
> >> By changing to dg-skip-if, the entire test case is omitted.
> >>
> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c: Replace
> >> 	dg-xfail-if with gd-skip-if.
> >
> 
> Since Kyrill explicitly added the dg-xfail for arm in
> r8-6382-gda1f8d7f12c2ef , I am not sure he is OK with making the failure
> disappear?

Thanks for checking. These intrinsics are not implemented in arm, but they should be. We just never got around to adding the support.
I don't know if we have a recommendation for how to mark such cases.
So I'm okay witch changing this to dg-skip-if, but perhaps we should change the message to "unimplemented" rather than "unsupported"?
Thanks,
Kyrill

> 
> Christophe
> 
> > Typo: s/gd/dg/
> >
> > OK with that change, thanks.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c: Likewise.
> >> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c: Likewise.
> >>
> >> Co-Authored-By: Yvan ROUX  <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON  <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
> >> ---
> >>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c | 2 +-
> >>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c | 2 +-
> >>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c | 2 +-
> >>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> >> index 92a139bc523..f933102be47 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> >> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-do run } */
> >> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
> >>
> >>   #include <arm_neon.h>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> >> index 6ddd507d9cf..b20dec061b5 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> >> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-do run } */
> >> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
> >>
> >>   #include <arm_neon.h>
> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> >> index 451a0afc6aa..e59f845880e 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>   /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
> >> -/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-do run } */
> >> +/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
> >>   /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
> >>
> >>   #include <arm_neon.h>
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
index 92a139bc523..f933102be47 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
 
 #include <arm_neon.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
index 6ddd507d9cf..b20dec061b5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x3.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
 
 #include <arm_neon.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
index 451a0afc6aa..e59f845880e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vld1x4.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /* We haven't implemented these intrinsics for arm yet.  */
-/* { dg-xfail-if "" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "unsupported" { arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O3" } */
 
 #include <arm_neon.h>