[v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc offload in channel mode

Message ID 20230918075358.5878-1-rogerq@kernel.org
State New
Headers
Series [v2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc offload in channel mode |

Commit Message

Roger Quadros Sept. 18, 2023, 7:53 a.m. UTC
  From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

This patch adds MQPRIO Qdisc offload in full 'channel' mode which allows
not only setting up pri:tc mapping, but also configuring TX shapers
(rate-limiting) on external port FIFOs.

The MQPRIO Qdisc offload is expected to work with or without VLAN/priority
tagged packets.

The CPSW external Port FIFO has 8 Priority queues. The rate-limit can be
set for each of these priority queues. Which Priority queue a packet is
assigned to depends on PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP register which maps header
priority to switch priority.

The header priority of a packet is assigned via the P0_REG_RX_PRI_MAP
register which maps packet priority to header priority.

The packet priority is either the VLAN priority (for VLAN tagged packets)
or the thread/channel offset.

For simplicity, we assign the same priority queue to all queues of a
Traffic Class so it can be rate-limited correctly.

Configuration example:
 ethtool -L eth1 tx 5
 ethtool --set-priv-flags eth1 p0-rx-ptype-rrobin off

 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent root handle 100: mqprio num_tc 3 \
 map 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \
 queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 hw 1 mode channel \
 shaper bw_rlimit min_rate 0 100mbit 200mbit max_rate 0 101mbit 202mbit

 tc qdisc replace dev eth2 handle 100: parent root mqprio num_tc 1 \
 map 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 queues 1@0 hw 1

 ip link add link eth1 name eth1.100 type vlan id 100
 ip link set eth1.100 type vlan egress 0:0 1:1 2:2 3:3 4:4 5:5 6:6 7:7

In the above example two ports share the same TX CPPI queue 0 for low
priority traffic. 3 traffic classes are defined for eth1 and mapped to:
TC0 - low priority, TX CPPI queue 0 -> ext Port 1 fifo0, no rate limit
TC1 - prio 2, TX CPPI queue 1 -> ext Port 1 fifo1, CIR=100Mbit/s, EIR=1Mbit/s
TC2 - prio 3, TX CPPI queue 2 -> ext Port 1 fifo2, CIR=200Mbit/s, EIR=2Mbit/s

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c | 354 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h |   8 +
 2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Changelog:
---------
v2:
- clean up commit message
- avoid forward declarations
- use tc_mqprio_qopt_offload :: extack for error message reporting
- avoid unnecessary mqprio->qopt.hw == 0 checks
- set struct tc_mqprio_caps :: validate_queue_counts = true and get rid of
  am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify()
- do not modify AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_RX_PRI_MAP register.


base-commit: 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d
  

Comments

Paolo Abeni Sept. 19, 2023, 11:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 10:53 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> @@ -937,3 +918,296 @@ void am65_cpsw_qos_tx_p0_rate_init(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
>  		       host->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(tx_ch));

[...]

> +static int am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(struct am65_cpsw_port *port,
> +					  struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio)
> +{
> +	u64 min_rate_total = 0, max_rate_total = 0;
> +	u32 min_rate_msk = 0, max_rate_msk = 0;
> +	bool has_min_rate, has_max_rate;
> +	int num_tc, i;
> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> +	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = mqprio->extack;

Please, respect the reverse x-mas tree order.

> +
> +	if (!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_SHAPER))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (mqprio->shaper != TC_MQPRIO_SHAPER_BW_RATE)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	has_min_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MIN_RATE);
> +	has_max_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MAX_RATE);
> +
> +	if (!has_min_rate && has_max_rate) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "min_rate is required with max_rate");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!has_min_rate)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	num_tc = mqprio->qopt.num_tc;
> +
> +	for (i = num_tc - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		u32 ch_msk;
> +
> +		if (mqprio->min_rate[i])
> +			min_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
> +		min_rate_total +=  mqprio->min_rate[i];
> +
> +		if (has_max_rate) {
> +			if (mqprio->max_rate[i])
> +				max_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
> +			max_rate_total +=  mqprio->max_rate[i];
> +
> +			if (!mqprio->min_rate[i] && mqprio->max_rate[i]) {
> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
> +						       "TX tc%d rate max>0 but min=0\n",
> +						       i);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (mqprio->max_rate[i] &&
> +			    mqprio->max_rate[i] < mqprio->min_rate[i]) {
> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
> +						       "TX tc%d rate min(%llu)>max(%llu)\n",
> +						       i, mqprio->min_rate[i],
> +						       mqprio->max_rate[i]);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		ch_msk = GENMASK(num_tc - 1, i);
> +		if ((min_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (min_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
> +					       "TX min rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
> +					       min_rate_msk);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if ((max_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (max_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
> +					       "TX max rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
> +					       max_rate_msk);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	min_rate_total *= 8;
> +	min_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;
> +	max_rate_total *= 8;
> +	max_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;

For consistency with other code doing the same algebra, you could use a
single statement for both '*' and '/'. You could also add an helper for
that conversion, as there are multiple use-case already.

> +
> +	if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
> +		if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> +					       min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> +					       max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;
> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +
> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;
> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
> +
> +	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
> +	netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
> +	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
> +
> +	/* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
> +	writel(0,
> +	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);

No need to wrap the above statement on multiple lines.

> +}
> +
> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> +{
> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
> +	int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
> +	u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
> +	u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
> +
> +	if (!num_tc) {
> +		am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(port, mqprio);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto exit_put;
> +
> +	netdev_set_num_tc(ndev, num_tc);
> +
> +	/* Multiple Linux priorities can map to a Traffic Class
> +	 * A Traffic Class can have multiple contiguous Queues,
> +	 * Queues get mapped to Channels (thread_id),
> +	 *	if not VLAN tagged, thread_id is used as packet_priority
> +	 *	if VLAN tagged. VLAN priority is used as packet_priorit
> +	 * packet_priority gets mapped to header_priority in p0_rx_pri_map,
> +	 * header_priority gets mapped to switch_priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
> +	 * As p0_rx_pri_map is left at defaults (0x76543210), we can
> +	 * assume that Queue_n gets mapped to header_priority_n. We can then
> +	 * set the switch priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
> +	 */
> +
> +	for (tc = 0; tc < num_tc; tc++) {
> +	 /* For simplicity we assign the same priority (TCn) to all queues
> +	  * of a Traffic Class.
> +	  */

Please align the comment with the relevant code.

[...]

> +diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
> index 0cc2a3b3d7f9..5431fbf8b6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
>  
>  struct am65_cpsw_common;
> +struct am65_cpsw_port;
>  
>  struct am65_cpsw_est {
>  	int buf;
> @@ -16,6 +17,12 @@ struct am65_cpsw_est {
>  	struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload taprio;
>  };
>  
> +struct am65_cpsw_mqprio {
> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload mqprio_hw;
> +	u64 max_rate_total;
> +	unsigned shaper_en:1;

Perhaps 'bool' instead?


Cheers,

Paolo
  
Vladimir Oltean Sept. 19, 2023, 12:47 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Roger,

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:53:58AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> -int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> -			       void *type_data)
> -{
> -	switch (type) {
> -	case TC_QUERY_CAPS:
> -		return am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(ndev, type_data);
> -	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
> -		return am65_cpsw_setup_taprio(ndev, type_data);
> -	case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
> -		return am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(ndev, type_data);
> -	default:
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
> -{
> -	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> -
> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
> -		return;
> -
> -	am65_cpsw_est_link_up(ndev, link_speed);
> -	port->qos.link_down_time = 0;
> -}
> -
> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_down(struct net_device *ndev)
> -{
> -	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> -
> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!port->qos.link_down_time)
> -		port->qos.link_down_time = ktime_get();
> -
> -	port->qos.link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> -}
> -

Could you split the code movement to a separate change?

> +	if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
> +		if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> +					       min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
> +					       max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}

Link speeds can be renegotiated, and the mqprio offload can be installed
while the link is down. So this restriction, while honorable, has limited
usefulness.

> +
> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;

s/1/true/

> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +
> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;

s/0/false/

> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
> +
> +	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
> +	netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
> +	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
> +
> +	/* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
> +	writel(0,
> +	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);

What exactly needs pm_runtime_get_sync()? This writel() doesn't?

> +}
> +
> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> +{
> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
> +	int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
> +	u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
> +	u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
> +
> +	if (!num_tc) {
> +		am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
  
Roger Quadros Sept. 20, 2023, 7:09 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Paolo,

On 19/09/2023 14:32, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-18 at 10:53 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> @@ -937,3 +918,296 @@ void am65_cpsw_qos_tx_p0_rate_init(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
>>  		       host->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(tx_ch));
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static int am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(struct am65_cpsw_port *port,
>> +					  struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio)
>> +{
>> +	u64 min_rate_total = 0, max_rate_total = 0;
>> +	u32 min_rate_msk = 0, max_rate_msk = 0;
>> +	bool has_min_rate, has_max_rate;
>> +	int num_tc, i;
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
>> +	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = mqprio->extack;
> 
> Please, respect the reverse x-mas tree order.
> 
>> +
>> +	if (!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_SHAPER))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (mqprio->shaper != TC_MQPRIO_SHAPER_BW_RATE)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	has_min_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MIN_RATE);
>> +	has_max_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MAX_RATE);
>> +
>> +	if (!has_min_rate && has_max_rate) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "min_rate is required with max_rate");
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!has_min_rate)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	num_tc = mqprio->qopt.num_tc;
>> +
>> +	for (i = num_tc - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>> +		u32 ch_msk;
>> +
>> +		if (mqprio->min_rate[i])
>> +			min_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
>> +		min_rate_total +=  mqprio->min_rate[i];
>> +
>> +		if (has_max_rate) {
>> +			if (mqprio->max_rate[i])
>> +				max_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
>> +			max_rate_total +=  mqprio->max_rate[i];
>> +
>> +			if (!mqprio->min_rate[i] && mqprio->max_rate[i]) {
>> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
>> +						       "TX tc%d rate max>0 but min=0\n",
>> +						       i);
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (mqprio->max_rate[i] &&
>> +			    mqprio->max_rate[i] < mqprio->min_rate[i]) {
>> +				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
>> +						       "TX tc%d rate min(%llu)>max(%llu)\n",
>> +						       i, mqprio->min_rate[i],
>> +						       mqprio->max_rate[i]);
>> +				return -EINVAL;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ch_msk = GENMASK(num_tc - 1, i);
>> +		if ((min_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (min_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
>> +					       "TX min rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
>> +					       min_rate_msk);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if ((max_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (max_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
>> +					       "TX max rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
>> +					       max_rate_msk);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	min_rate_total *= 8;
>> +	min_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;
>> +	max_rate_total *= 8;
>> +	max_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;
> 
> For consistency with other code doing the same algebra, you could use a
> single statement for both '*' and '/'. You could also add an helper for
> that conversion, as there are multiple use-case already.
> 
>> +
>> +	if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
>> +		if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
>> +					       min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
>> +					       max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;
>> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
>> +
>> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;
>> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
>> +
>> +	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
>> +	netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
>> +	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
>> +
>> +	/* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
>> +	writel(0,
>> +	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
> 
> No need to wrap the above statement on multiple lines.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
>> +{
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
>> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
>> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
>> +	int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
>> +	u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
>> +	u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
>> +
>> +	if (!num_tc) {
>> +		am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(port, mqprio);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto exit_put;
>> +
>> +	netdev_set_num_tc(ndev, num_tc);
>> +
>> +	/* Multiple Linux priorities can map to a Traffic Class
>> +	 * A Traffic Class can have multiple contiguous Queues,
>> +	 * Queues get mapped to Channels (thread_id),
>> +	 *	if not VLAN tagged, thread_id is used as packet_priority
>> +	 *	if VLAN tagged. VLAN priority is used as packet_priorit
>> +	 * packet_priority gets mapped to header_priority in p0_rx_pri_map,
>> +	 * header_priority gets mapped to switch_priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
>> +	 * As p0_rx_pri_map is left at defaults (0x76543210), we can
>> +	 * assume that Queue_n gets mapped to header_priority_n. We can then
>> +	 * set the switch priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	for (tc = 0; tc < num_tc; tc++) {
>> +	 /* For simplicity we assign the same priority (TCn) to all queues
>> +	  * of a Traffic Class.
>> +	  */
> 
> Please align the comment with the relevant code.
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
>> index 0cc2a3b3d7f9..5431fbf8b6e0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>  #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
>>  
>>  struct am65_cpsw_common;
>> +struct am65_cpsw_port;
>>  
>>  struct am65_cpsw_est {
>>  	int buf;
>> @@ -16,6 +17,12 @@ struct am65_cpsw_est {
>>  	struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload taprio;
>>  };
>>  
>> +struct am65_cpsw_mqprio {
>> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload mqprio_hw;
>> +	u64 max_rate_total;
>> +	unsigned shaper_en:1;
> 
> Perhaps 'bool' instead?

Thanks for the review. I'll fix them in next revision.
  
Roger Quadros Sept. 20, 2023, 7:19 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Vladimir,

On 19/09/2023 15:47, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:53:58AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> -int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
>> -			       void *type_data)
>> -{
>> -	switch (type) {
>> -	case TC_QUERY_CAPS:
>> -		return am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(ndev, type_data);
>> -	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
>> -		return am65_cpsw_setup_taprio(ndev, type_data);
>> -	case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
>> -		return am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(ndev, type_data);
>> -	default:
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -	}
>> -}
>> -
>> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
>> -{
>> -	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> -
>> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	am65_cpsw_est_link_up(ndev, link_speed);
>> -	port->qos.link_down_time = 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -void am65_cpsw_qos_link_down(struct net_device *ndev)
>> -{
>> -	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> -
>> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	if (!port->qos.link_down_time)
>> -		port->qos.link_down_time = ktime_get();
>> -
>> -	port->qos.link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>> -}
>> -
> 
> Could you split the code movement to a separate change?

OK.

> 
>> +	if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
>> +		if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
>> +					       min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
>> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
>> +					       max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
> 
> Link speeds can be renegotiated, and the mqprio offload can be installed
> while the link is down. So this restriction, while honorable, has limited
> usefulness.

For link down case it won't run those checks, but I get your point.
I'll drop these checks.

> 
>> +
>> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;
> 
> s/1/true/
> 
>> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
>> +
>> +	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;
> 
> s/0/false/
> 
>> +	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
>> +
>> +	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
>> +	netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
>> +	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
>> +
>> +	/* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
>> +	writel(0,
>> +	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
> 
> What exactly needs pm_runtime_get_sync()? This writel() doesn't?

Good catch. In my tests, the network interface was up so controller
was already active. But we will need to do a pm_runtime_get_sync()
if all network interfaces of the controller are down.

So, I will need to move the pm_runtime_get_sync() call before
am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio();

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
>> +{
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
>> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
>> +	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
>> +	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
>> +	int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
>> +	u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
>> +	u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
>> +
>> +	if (!num_tc) {
>> +		am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
index 9ac2ff05d501..63742821defa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
@@ -16,10 +16,19 @@ 
 #include "cpsw_ale.h"
 
 #define AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL			0x004
+#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_TX_PRI_MAP		0x018
+#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_RX_PRI_MAP		0x020
+#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_FIFO_STATUS		0x050
+#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_CIR(pri)		(0x140 + 4 * (pri))
+#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_EIR(pri)		(0x160 + 4 * (pri))
+
 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_CTL			0x004
+#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP		0x018
+#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_RX_PRI_MAP		0x020
 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_FIFO_STATUS		0x050
 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_EST_CTL		0x060
 #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(pri)		(0x140 + 4 * (pri))
+#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_EIR(pri)		(0x160 + 4 * (pri))
 
 /* AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL register fields */
 #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_EST_EN			BIT(18)
@@ -56,6 +65,10 @@  enum timer_act {
 	TACT_SKIP_PROG,		/* just buffer can be updated */
 };
 
+/* number of priority queues per port FIFO */
+#define AM65_CPSW_PN_FIFO_PRIO_NUM		8
+#define AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT		0x76543210
+
 static int am65_cpsw_port_est_enabled(struct am65_cpsw_port *port)
 {
 	return port->qos.est_oper || port->qos.est_admin;
@@ -541,7 +554,6 @@  static void am65_cpsw_est_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
 	ktime_t cur_time;
 	s64 delta;
 
-	port->qos.link_speed = link_speed;
 	if (!am65_cpsw_port_est_enabled(port))
 		return;
 
@@ -596,6 +608,14 @@  static int am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
 	struct tc_query_caps_base *base = type_data;
 
 	switch (base->type) {
+	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO: {
+		struct tc_mqprio_caps *caps = base->caps;
+
+		caps->validate_queue_counts = true;
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO: {
 		struct tc_taprio_caps *caps = base->caps;
 
@@ -787,45 +807,6 @@  static int am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(struct net_device *ndev, struct flow_blo
 					  port, port, true);
 }
 
-int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
-			       void *type_data)
-{
-	switch (type) {
-	case TC_QUERY_CAPS:
-		return am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(ndev, type_data);
-	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
-		return am65_cpsw_setup_taprio(ndev, type_data);
-	case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
-		return am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(ndev, type_data);
-	default:
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-}
-
-void am65_cpsw_qos_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
-{
-	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
-
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
-		return;
-
-	am65_cpsw_est_link_up(ndev, link_speed);
-	port->qos.link_down_time = 0;
-}
-
-void am65_cpsw_qos_link_down(struct net_device *ndev)
-{
-	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
-
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
-		return;
-
-	if (!port->qos.link_down_time)
-		port->qos.link_down_time = ktime_get();
-
-	port->qos.link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
-}
-
 static u32
 am65_cpsw_qos_tx_rate_calc(u32 rate_mbps, unsigned long bus_freq)
 {
@@ -937,3 +918,296 @@  void am65_cpsw_qos_tx_p0_rate_init(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
 		       host->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(tx_ch));
 	}
 }
+
+static void am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(struct am65_cpsw_port *port)
+{
+	int prio;
+
+	for (prio = 0; prio < AM65_CPSW_PN_FIFO_PRIO_NUM; prio++) {
+		writel(0, port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(prio));
+		writel(0, port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_EIR(prio));
+	}
+}
+
+static void am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(struct am65_cpsw_port *port)
+{
+	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
+	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
+	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio;
+	bool enable, shaper_susp = false;
+	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt;
+	u32 rate_mbps;
+	int tc, prio;
+
+	mqprio = &p_mqprio->mqprio_hw;
+	qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
+	/* takes care of no link case as well */
+	if (p_mqprio->max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed)
+		shaper_susp = true;
+
+	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
+
+	enable = p_mqprio->shaper_en && !shaper_susp;
+	if (!enable)
+		return;
+
+	/* Rate limit is specified per Traffic Class but
+	 * for CPSW, rate limit can be applied per priority
+	 * at port FIFO.
+	 *
+	 * We have assigned the same priority (TCn) to all queues
+	 * of a Traffic Class so they share the same shaper
+	 * bandwidth.
+	 */
+	for (tc = 0; tc < mqprio->qopt.num_tc; tc++) {
+		prio = tc;
+
+		rate_mbps = mqprio->min_rate[tc] * 8 / 1000000;
+		rate_mbps = am65_cpsw_qos_tx_rate_calc(rate_mbps,
+						       common->bus_freq);
+		writel(rate_mbps,
+		       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(prio));
+
+		rate_mbps = 0;
+
+		if (mqprio->max_rate[tc]) {
+			rate_mbps = mqprio->max_rate[tc] - mqprio->min_rate[tc];
+			rate_mbps = rate_mbps * 8 / 1000000;
+			rate_mbps = am65_cpsw_qos_tx_rate_calc(rate_mbps,
+							       common->bus_freq);
+		}
+
+		writel(rate_mbps,
+		       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_EIR(prio));
+	}
+}
+
+void am65_cpsw_qos_link_up(struct net_device *ndev, int link_speed)
+{
+	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
+
+	port->qos.link_speed = link_speed;
+	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(port);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
+		return;
+
+	am65_cpsw_est_link_up(ndev, link_speed);
+	port->qos.link_down_time = 0;
+}
+
+void am65_cpsw_qos_link_down(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TI_AM65_CPSW_TAS))
+		return;
+
+	if (!port->qos.link_down_time)
+		port->qos.link_down_time = ktime_get();
+
+	port->qos.link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
+	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(port);
+}
+
+static int am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(struct am65_cpsw_port *port,
+					  struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio)
+{
+	u64 min_rate_total = 0, max_rate_total = 0;
+	u32 min_rate_msk = 0, max_rate_msk = 0;
+	bool has_min_rate, has_max_rate;
+	int num_tc, i;
+	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
+	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = mqprio->extack;
+
+	if (!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_SHAPER))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (mqprio->shaper != TC_MQPRIO_SHAPER_BW_RATE)
+		return 0;
+
+	has_min_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MIN_RATE);
+	has_max_rate = !!(mqprio->flags & TC_MQPRIO_F_MAX_RATE);
+
+	if (!has_min_rate && has_max_rate) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "min_rate is required with max_rate");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (!has_min_rate)
+		return 0;
+
+	num_tc = mqprio->qopt.num_tc;
+
+	for (i = num_tc - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		u32 ch_msk;
+
+		if (mqprio->min_rate[i])
+			min_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
+		min_rate_total +=  mqprio->min_rate[i];
+
+		if (has_max_rate) {
+			if (mqprio->max_rate[i])
+				max_rate_msk |= BIT(i);
+			max_rate_total +=  mqprio->max_rate[i];
+
+			if (!mqprio->min_rate[i] && mqprio->max_rate[i]) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+						       "TX tc%d rate max>0 but min=0\n",
+						       i);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
+			if (mqprio->max_rate[i] &&
+			    mqprio->max_rate[i] < mqprio->min_rate[i]) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+						       "TX tc%d rate min(%llu)>max(%llu)\n",
+						       i, mqprio->min_rate[i],
+						       mqprio->max_rate[i]);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+		}
+
+		ch_msk = GENMASK(num_tc - 1, i);
+		if ((min_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (min_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+					       "TX min rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
+					       min_rate_msk);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if ((max_rate_msk & BIT(i)) && (max_rate_msk ^ ch_msk)) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+					       "TX max rate limiting has to be enabled sequentially hi->lo tx_rate_msk%x\n",
+					       max_rate_msk);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	min_rate_total *= 8;
+	min_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;
+	max_rate_total *= 8;
+	max_rate_total /= 1000 * 1000;
+
+	if (port->qos.link_speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
+		if (min_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate min %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
+					       min_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (max_rate_total > port->qos.link_speed) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack, "TX rate max %llu exceeds link speed %d\n",
+					       max_rate_total, port->qos.link_speed);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 1;
+	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = max_t(u64, min_rate_total, max_rate_total);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
+{
+	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
+	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
+	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
+
+	p_mqprio->shaper_en = 0;
+	p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
+
+	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
+	netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
+	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
+
+	/* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
+	writel(0,
+	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
+}
+
+static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
+{
+	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
+	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
+	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
+	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
+	struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
+	int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
+	u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
+	u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
+
+	if (!num_tc) {
+		am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(port, mqprio);
+	if (ret)
+		goto exit_put;
+
+	netdev_set_num_tc(ndev, num_tc);
+
+	/* Multiple Linux priorities can map to a Traffic Class
+	 * A Traffic Class can have multiple contiguous Queues,
+	 * Queues get mapped to Channels (thread_id),
+	 *	if not VLAN tagged, thread_id is used as packet_priority
+	 *	if VLAN tagged. VLAN priority is used as packet_priorit
+	 * packet_priority gets mapped to header_priority in p0_rx_pri_map,
+	 * header_priority gets mapped to switch_priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
+	 * As p0_rx_pri_map is left at defaults (0x76543210), we can
+	 * assume that Queue_n gets mapped to header_priority_n. We can then
+	 * set the switch priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
+	 */
+
+	for (tc = 0; tc < num_tc; tc++) {
+	 /* For simplicity we assign the same priority (TCn) to all queues
+	  * of a Traffic Class.
+	  */
+		prio = tc;
+
+		/* set this prio to all queues for this TC */
+		for (i = qopt->offset[tc]; i < qopt->offset[tc] + qopt->count[tc]; i++)
+			tx_prio_map |= prio << (4 * i);
+
+		count = qopt->count[tc];
+		offset = qopt->offset[tc];
+		netdev_set_tc_queue(ndev, tc, count, offset);
+	}
+
+	writel(tx_prio_map,
+	       port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
+
+	am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(port);
+
+exit_put:
+	pm_runtime_put(common->dev);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
+			       void *type_data)
+{
+	switch (type) {
+	case TC_QUERY_CAPS:
+		return am65_cpsw_tc_query_caps(ndev, type_data);
+	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
+		return am65_cpsw_setup_taprio(ndev, type_data);
+	case TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO:
+		return am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(ndev, type_data);
+	case TC_SETUP_BLOCK:
+		return am65_cpsw_qos_setup_tc_block(ndev, type_data);
+	default:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
index 0cc2a3b3d7f9..5431fbf8b6e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 
 #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
 
 struct am65_cpsw_common;
+struct am65_cpsw_port;
 
 struct am65_cpsw_est {
 	int buf;
@@ -16,6 +17,12 @@  struct am65_cpsw_est {
 	struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload taprio;
 };
 
+struct am65_cpsw_mqprio {
+	struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload mqprio_hw;
+	u64 max_rate_total;
+	unsigned shaper_en:1;
+};
+
 struct am65_cpsw_ale_ratelimit {
 	unsigned long cookie;
 	u64 rate_packet_ps;
@@ -26,6 +33,7 @@  struct am65_cpsw_qos {
 	struct am65_cpsw_est *est_oper;
 	ktime_t link_down_time;
 	int link_speed;
+	struct am65_cpsw_mqprio mqprio;
 
 	struct am65_cpsw_ale_ratelimit ale_bc_ratelimit;
 	struct am65_cpsw_ale_ratelimit ale_mc_ratelimit;