test: Adapt slp-26.c check for RVV
Checks
Commit Message
Fix FAILs:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
Since RVV is able to vectorize it with VLS modes like amdgcn.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c: Adapt for RVV.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> Fix FAILs:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
>
> Since RVV is able to vectorize it with VLS modes like amdgcn.
OK
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c: Adapt for RVV.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> index d398a5acb0c..196981d83c1 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */
>
Committed, thanks Richard.
Pan
-----Original Message-----
From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-bounces+pan2.li=intel.com@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 8:23 PM
To: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Adapt slp-26.c check for RVV
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> Fix FAILs:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 0 loops" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0
>
> Since RVV is able to vectorize it with VLS modes like amdgcn.
OK
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c: Adapt for RVV.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> index d398a5acb0c..196981d83c1 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-26.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */
>
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
return 0;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || amdgcn-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect" { target { ! { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect" { target { mips_msa || { amdgcn-*-* || riscv_vector } } } } } */