diff mbox series

[v3,49/50] dt-bindings: arm: add sam9x75 curiosity board

Message ID 20230728103106.267793-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com
State New
Headers
Series [v3,01/50] dt-bindings: microchip: atmel,at91rm9200-tcb: add sam9x60, sam9x7 compatible |

Commit Message

Varshini Rajendran July 28, 2023, 10:31 a.m. UTC 
  Add documentation for SAM9X75 Curiosity board.

Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Comments

Rob Herring July 28, 2023, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add documentation for SAM9X75 Curiosity board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> index dfb8fd089197..15b11feae46a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ properties:
>            - const: microchip,sam9x60
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9
>  
> +      - description: Microchip SAM9X7 Evaluation Boards
> +        items:
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x75-curiosity
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7
> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9

Has this compatible been useful in prior use? Can s/w make some decision 
based on it? If not, I'd drop it.

Rob
Varshini Rajendran Aug. 10, 2023, 5:59 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 29/07/23 12:55 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add documentation for SAM9X75 Curiosity board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> index dfb8fd089197..15b11feae46a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
>> @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ properties:
>>             - const: microchip,sam9x60
>>             - const: atmel,at91sam9
>>
>> +      - description: Microchip SAM9X7 Evaluation Boards
>> +        items:
>> +          - const: microchip,sam9x75-curiosity
>> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7
>> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9
> 
> Has this compatible been useful in prior use? Can s/w make some decision
> based on it? If not, I'd drop it.

Hi Rob,

There is no s/w decision depending on this compatible per se. But this 
is how we have maintained different boards from the same SoC or SoC 
family so far. So I would say, any decision on this would require 
discussion internally.

> 
> Rob

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
index dfb8fd089197..15b11feae46a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
@@ -99,6 +99,12 @@  properties:
           - const: microchip,sam9x60
           - const: atmel,at91sam9
 
+      - description: Microchip SAM9X7 Evaluation Boards
+        items:
+          - const: microchip,sam9x75-curiosity
+          - const: microchip,sam9x7
+          - const: atmel,at91sam9
+
       - description: Nattis v2 board with Natte v2 power board
         items:
           - const: axentia,nattis-2