diff mbox series

mips: dts: ralink: reorder MT7621 clocks in Ethernet block

Message ID 20230729110449.1357-1-zajec5@gmail.com
State New
Headers
Series mips: dts: ralink: reorder MT7621 clocks in Ethernet block |

Commit Message

Rafał Miłecki July 29, 2023, 11:04 a.m. UTC 
  From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").

This fixes:
arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
        From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
        From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml

Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
 arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Arınç ÜNAL July 29, 2023, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 29.07.2023 14:04, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").
> 
> This fixes:
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
>          From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
>          From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> 
> Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

I'm not sure if I should agree with this patch. The relevant parts of 
the schema for mediatek,mt7621-eth were added way later than the 
existing bindings on mt7621.dtsi. Why don't we address this on the 
schema along with a bunch of other issues the patch for 
mediatek,mt7621-eth brought?

Arınç
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno July 31, 2023, 10:32 a.m. UTC | #2 
Il 29/07/23 13:04, Rafał Miłecki ha scritto:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").
> 
> This fixes:
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
>          From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
>          From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> 
> Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Sergio Paracuellos Aug. 1, 2023, 6:33 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 1:04 PM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").
>
> This fixes:
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
>
> Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Acked-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>

Thanks,
    Sergio Paracuellos
Arınç ÜNAL Aug. 1, 2023, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #4 
I haven't received anything arguing with this so my answer is still no.

Also, this patch changes the lines introduced with b2f471a26721 
("staging: mt7621-dts: make use of new 'mt7621-clk'").

Arınç

On 29.07.2023 17:08, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 29.07.2023 14:04, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> Use order as specified in the binding (first "ethif" then "fe").
>>
>> This fixes:
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: 
>> ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:0: 'ethif' was expected
>>          From schema: 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dtb: 
>> ethernet@1e100000: clock-names:1: 'fe' was expected
>>          From schema: 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek,net.yaml
>>
>> Fixes: 7a6ee0bbab25 ("mips: dts: ralink: add MT7621 SoC")
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> I'm not sure if I should agree with this patch. The relevant parts of 
> the schema for mediatek,mt7621-eth were added way later than the 
> existing bindings on mt7621.dtsi. Why don't we address this on the 
> schema along with a bunch of other issues the patch for 
> mediatek,mt7621-eth brought?
> 
> Arınç
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
index 7caed0d14f11..73035d4f4cc1 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi
@@ -300,9 +300,9 @@  ethernet: ethernet@1e100000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-eth";
 		reg = <0x1e100000 0x10000>;
 
-		clocks = <&sysc MT7621_CLK_FE>,
-			 <&sysc MT7621_CLK_ETH>;
-		clock-names = "fe", "ethif";
+		clocks = <&sysc MT7621_CLK_ETH>,
+			 <&sysc MT7621_CLK_FE>;
+		clock-names = "ethif", "fe";
 
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;