[v2] vdpa_sim: fix possible memory leak in vdpasim_net_init() and vdpasim_blk_init()
Message ID | 20221110050446.3932031-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a5d:6687:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l7csp732667wru; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5pBdOzWss2dh9v5phGkCdRto+vWyBcYmCZm3gB/ww4kcIxDJQyykJNceeRn7N59VGxULBq X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d78f:0:b0:461:8d98:3d6d with SMTP id s15-20020aa7d78f000000b004618d983d6dmr1594910edq.116.1668057044220; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1668057044; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qlP9PdjlEGamquYpk8dlosftzWT9sPImutrnr8noYe40kHMI+n/CWd8nu/vJnfRug5 82M+dpZRGt41d/k/iNskJC7+j5pOhn2lvJkONL9TlpHIeZxT3TR4uc2UDwrQlI8fiDre sVoF7vcXhGwgfGyeMLWhupGthOJlvazQmO84h0wet7v/c6o49FrImC0ZE3mnq8hKzgHr Zk5/k98Qd89MEnGuAvoLqLBJp0fR2YW2Y/A7O7jvzmjsmh1Law85PWJjTh3v4g1YjQQr 5oiaT1WAKvdX+qgtqmGbdvxEakQqhJapgIDe6rCJdu8O5IrsabgpmZhPK4F+e/ufUBQ0 xzHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=+Wcmz7voPyOA88P4ELUjFdHw2d1whQZrgF5bh9CTi7w=; b=u7PNJ5ZWxHxuJhJpe1NSvgMyEheCtpvjWnXX030FbrU46FKNIo3lXQC4KgfP3qqCOQ XnJ6h4ez65zjyqzxpnCRdD/oDr7iIV9vILPI3y6iNNRqiPTVSWOIx2dcESYoBOFEoTll 94G3wPAtx5o5PCpsTUyGqp8wpdgBoOPDf73ypZM2i+sqXchwr7yKhYK0u+3OqB3aJQIb T3qDoMAKhlyNUNUzU3E3P6ZHp1icCWPoc2FUVBtTqYRjkkcRiUxohV1O7icTdZpbpEuw 2lOBBK5wXelAXehqMHTOtri74Ub9LkllXpuwtE3sPSDKxxLF0D7TmOvyIArErFCcvgFd Hjzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eb6-20020a0564020d0600b0046453c39abdsi20711882edb.104.2022.11.09.21.10.20; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 21:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230243AbiKJFIM (ORCPT <rfc822;dexuan.linux@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:08:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46456 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229516AbiKJFIH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:08:07 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413A12C123 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4N78wh3jVHzmV7B; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:07:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.175.83) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:08:02 +0800 From: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> To: <mst@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>, <sgarzare@redhat.com>, <eperezma@redhat.com>, <gautam.dawar@xilinx.com>, <elic@nvidia.com>, <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> CC: <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH v2] vdpa_sim: fix possible memory leak in vdpasim_net_init() and vdpasim_blk_init() Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:04:46 +0800 Message-ID: <20221110050446.3932031-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.67.175.83] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1749084583384228888?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1749084583384228888?= |
Series |
[v2] vdpa_sim: fix possible memory leak in vdpasim_net_init() and vdpasim_blk_init()
|
|
Commit Message
Jinjie Ruan
Nov. 10, 2022, 5:04 a.m. UTC
Inject fault while probing module, if device_register() fails in
vdpasim_net_init() or vdpasim_blk_init(), but the refcount of kobject is
not decreased to 0, the name allocated in dev_set_name() is leaked.
Fix this by calling put_device(), so that name can be freed in
callback function kobject_cleanup().
(vdpa_sim_net)
unreferenced object 0xffff88807eebc370 (size 16):
comm "modprobe", pid 3848, jiffies 4362982860 (age 18.153s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 6e 65 74 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_net.kkk.
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150
[<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60
[<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110
[<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
[<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80
[<ffffffffa0270013>] 0xffffffffa0270013
[<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0
[<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640
[<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0
[<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0
[<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
(vdpa_sim_blk)
unreferenced object 0xffff8881070c1250 (size 16):
comm "modprobe", pid 6844, jiffies 4364069319 (age 17.572s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 62 6c 6b 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_blk.kkk.
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150
[<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60
[<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110
[<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
[<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80
[<ffffffffa0220013>] 0xffffffffa0220013
[<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0
[<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640
[<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0
[<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0
[<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
[<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- add fault inject message
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c | 4 +++-
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:04:46PM +0800, ruanjinjie wrote: >Inject fault while probing module, if device_register() fails in >vdpasim_net_init() or vdpasim_blk_init(), but the refcount of kobject is >not decreased to 0, the name allocated in dev_set_name() is leaked. >Fix this by calling put_device(), so that name can be freed in >callback function kobject_cleanup(). > >(vdpa_sim_net) >unreferenced object 0xffff88807eebc370 (size 16): > comm "modprobe", pid 3848, jiffies 4362982860 (age 18.153s) > hex dump (first 16 bytes): > 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 6e 65 74 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_net.kkk. > backtrace: > [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150 > [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60 > [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110 > [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0 > [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80 > [<ffffffffa0270013>] 0xffffffffa0270013 > [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640 > [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0 > [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0 > [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 > [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 > >(vdpa_sim_blk) >unreferenced object 0xffff8881070c1250 (size 16): > comm "modprobe", pid 6844, jiffies 4364069319 (age 17.572s) > hex dump (first 16 bytes): > 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 62 6c 6b 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_blk.kkk. > backtrace: > [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150 > [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60 > [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110 > [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0 > [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80 > [<ffffffffa0220013>] 0xffffffffa0220013 > [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640 > [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0 > [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0 > [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 > [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 > >Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> >--- >v2: >- add fault inject message >--- > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c | 4 +++- > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for the v2 of this patch! It LGTM, just a couple of comments about the submit process. Usually when you get A-b R-b's and the patch doesn't change, it's better to bring them in later versions. Also, we had suggested reporting the Fixes tag, because usually when we fix a bug it's good to identify which patch introduced the problem, so it's easier to backport this fix into stable versions of the kernel. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes In this case we should use the following tags: Fixes: 899c4d187f6a ("vdpa_sim_blk: add support for vdpa management tool") Fixes: a3c06ae158dd ("vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user supported devices") With them: Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Thanks, Stefano
Thank you very much! On 2022/11/10 16:01, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:04:46PM +0800, ruanjinjie wrote: >> Inject fault while probing module, if device_register() fails in >> vdpasim_net_init() or vdpasim_blk_init(), but the refcount of kobject is >> not decreased to 0, the name allocated in dev_set_name() is leaked. >> Fix this by calling put_device(), so that name can be freed in >> callback function kobject_cleanup(). >> >> (vdpa_sim_net) >> unreferenced object 0xffff88807eebc370 (size 16): >> comm "modprobe", pid 3848, jiffies 4362982860 (age 18.153s) >> hex dump (first 16 bytes): >> 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 6e 65 74 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_net.kkk. >> backtrace: >> [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150 >> [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60 >> [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110 >> [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0 >> [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80 >> [<ffffffffa0270013>] 0xffffffffa0270013 >> [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0 >> [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640 >> [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0 >> [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0 >> [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 >> [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 >> >> (vdpa_sim_blk) >> unreferenced object 0xffff8881070c1250 (size 16): >> comm "modprobe", pid 6844, jiffies 4364069319 (age 17.572s) >> hex dump (first 16 bytes): >> 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 62 6c 6b 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_blk.kkk. >> backtrace: >> [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150 >> [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60 >> [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110 >> [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0 >> [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80 >> [<ffffffffa0220013>] 0xffffffffa0220013 >> [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0 >> [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640 >> [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0 >> [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0 >> [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 >> [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 >> >> Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> >> --- >> v2: >> - add fault inject message >> --- >> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c | 4 +++- >> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c | 4 +++- >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Thanks for the v2 of this patch! > It LGTM, just a couple of comments about the submit process. > > Usually when you get A-b R-b's and the patch doesn't change, it's better > to bring them in later versions. > > Also, we had suggested reporting the Fixes tag, because usually when we > fix a bug it's good to identify which patch introduced the problem, so > it's easier to backport this fix into stable versions of the kernel. > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes > > In this case we should use the following tags: > > Fixes: 899c4d187f6a ("vdpa_sim_blk: add support for vdpa management tool") > Fixes: a3c06ae158dd ("vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user supported > devices") > > With them: > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> > > Thanks, > Stefano >
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c index c6db1a1baf76..f745926237a8 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c @@ -427,8 +427,10 @@ static int __init vdpasim_blk_init(void) int ret; ret = device_register(&vdpasim_blk_mgmtdev); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + put_device(&vdpasim_blk_mgmtdev); return ret; + } ret = vdpa_mgmtdev_register(&mgmt_dev); if (ret) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c index c3cb225ea469..11f5a121df24 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c @@ -305,8 +305,10 @@ static int __init vdpasim_net_init(void) int ret; ret = device_register(&vdpasim_net_mgmtdev); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + put_device(&vdpasim_net_mgmtdev); return ret; + } ret = vdpa_mgmtdev_register(&mgmt_dev); if (ret)