[fortran] Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
Checks
Commit Message
The attached patch incorporates two of Steve's "Orphaned Patches" -
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-June/059423.html
They have in common that they both involve faults in use of default
type and that I was the ultimate cause of the bugs.
The patch regtests with the attached testcases.
I will commit in the next 24 hours unless there are any objections.
Paul
Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
gcc/fortran
PR fortran/99139
PR fortran/99368
* match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
defined types before applying default type.
(gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
unlnown type if possible.
* resolve.cc (resolve_fl_variable): Do not apply local default
initialization to assumed rank entities.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/999139
* gfortran.dg/pr99139.f90 : New test
PR fortran/99368
* gfortran.dg/pr99368.f90 : New test
Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
gcc/fortran
PR fortran/99139
PR fortran/99368
* match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
defined types before applying default type.
(gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
unlnown type if possible.
* resolve.cc (resolve_fl_variable): Do not apply local default
initialization to assumed rank entities.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/999139
* gfortran.dg/pr99139.f90 : New test
PR fortran/99368
* gfortran.dg/pr99368.f90 : New test
Comments
Hi Paul,
thanks for taking this.
I have just a minor comment regards coding style:
+ if (tmp
+ && tmp->attr.generic
+ && (tmp = gfc_find_dt_in_generic (tmp)))
+ {
+ if (tmp->attr.flavor == FL_DERIVED)
My reading of the guidelines says that I should rather write
if (tmp && tmp->attr.generic)
{
tmp = gfc_find_dt_in_generic (tmp);
if (tmp && tmp->attr.flavor == FL_DERIVED)
Both variants are equally readable, though.
I haven't though long enough about possible minor memleaks,
i.e. if a freeing of gfc_symbol tmp is advised.
Running f951 under valgrind might give you a hint.
Thanks,
Harald
Am 08.07.23 um 16:23 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches:
> The attached patch incorporates two of Steve's "Orphaned Patches" -
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-June/059423.html
>
> They have in common that they both involve faults in use of default
> type and that I was the ultimate cause of the bugs.
>
> The patch regtests with the attached testcases.
>
> I will commit in the next 24 hours unless there are any objections.
>
> Paul
>
> Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
>
> 2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/99139
> PR fortran/99368
> * match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
> defined types before applying default type.
> (gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
> unlnown type if possible.
> * resolve.cc (resolve_fl_variable): Do not apply local default
> initialization to assumed rank entities.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR fortran/999139
> * gfortran.dg/pr99139.f90 : New test
>
> PR fortran/99368
> * gfortran.dg/pr99368.f90 : New test
>
> Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
>
> 2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/99139
> PR fortran/99368
> * match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
> defined types before applying default type.
> (gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
> unlnown type if possible.
> * resolve.cc (resolve_fl_variable): Do not apply local default
> initialization to assumed rank entities.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR fortran/999139
> * gfortran.dg/pr99139.f90 : New test
>
> PR fortran/99368
> * gfortran.dg/pr99368.f90 : New test
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 03:23:31PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> The attached patch incorporates two of Steve's "Orphaned Patches" -
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-June/059423.html
Thanks Paul for picking up the pieces I left behind.
A few nits below.
> They have in common that they both involve faults in use of default
> type and that I was the ultimate cause of the bugs.
>
> The patch regtests with the attached testcases.
>
> I will commit in the next 24 hours unless there are any objections.
>
> Paul
>
> Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
>
> 2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
kargl@gcc.gnu.org.
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/99139
> PR fortran/99368
> * match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
> defined types before applying default type.
> (gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
> unlnown type if possible.
s/unlnown/unknown
> * resolve.cc (resolve_fl_variable): Do not apply local default
> initialization to assumed rank entities.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR fortran/999139
> * gfortran.dg/pr99139.f90 : New test
>
> PR fortran/99368
> * gfortran.dg/pr99368.f90 : New test
>
> Fortran: Fix default type bugs in gfortran [PR99139, PR99368]
>
> 2023-07-08 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
kargl@gcc.gnu.org
>
> gcc/fortran
> PR fortran/99139
> PR fortran/99368
> * match.cc (gfc_match_namelist): Check for host associated or
> defined types before applying default type.
> (gfc_match_select_rank): Apply default type to selector of
> unlnown type if possible.
s/unlnown/unknown
Other than the nits the patch looks fine.
@@ -5622,10 +5622,32 @@ gfc_match_namelist (void)
gfc_error_check ();
}
else
- /* If the type is not set already, we set it here to the
- implicit default type. It is not allowed to set it
- later to any other type. */
- gfc_set_default_type (sym, 0, gfc_current_ns);
+ {
+ /* Before the symbol is given an implicit type, check to
+ see if the symbol is already available in the namespace,
+ possibly through host association. Importantly, the
+ symbol may be a user defined type. */
+
+ gfc_symbol *tmp;
+
+ gfc_find_symbol (sym->name, NULL, 1, &tmp);
+ if (tmp
+ && tmp->attr.generic
+ && (tmp = gfc_find_dt_in_generic (tmp)))
+ {
+ if (tmp->attr.flavor == FL_DERIVED)
+ {
+ gfc_error ("Derived type %qs at %L conflicts with "
+ "namelist object %qs at %C",
+ tmp->name, &tmp->declared_at, sym->name);
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Set type of the symbol to its implicit default type. It is
+ not allowed to set it later to any other type. */
+ gfc_set_default_type (sym, 0, gfc_current_ns);
+ }
}
if (sym->attr.in_namelist == 0
&& !gfc_add_in_namelist (&sym->attr, sym->name, NULL))
@@ -6805,8 +6827,20 @@ gfc_match_select_rank (void)
gfc_current_ns = gfc_build_block_ns (ns);
m = gfc_match (" %n => %e", name, &expr2);
+
if (m == MATCH_YES)
{
+ /* If expr2 corresponds to an implicitly typed variable, then the
+ actual type of the variable may not have been set. Set it here. */
+ if (!gfc_current_ns->seen_implicit_none
+ && expr2->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
+ && expr2->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN
+ && expr2->symtree && expr2->symtree->n.sym)
+ {
+ gfc_set_default_type (expr2->symtree->n.sym, 0, gfc_current_ns);
+ expr2->ts.type = expr2->symtree->n.sym->ts.type;
+ }
+
expr1 = gfc_get_expr ();
expr1->expr_type = EXPR_VARIABLE;
expr1->where = expr2->where;
@@ -13510,7 +13510,8 @@ resolve_fl_variable (gfc_symbol *sym, int mp_flag)
}
}
- if (sym->value == NULL && sym->attr.referenced)
+ if (sym->value == NULL && sym->attr.referenced
+ && !(sym->as && sym->as->type == AS_ASSUMED_RANK))
apply_default_init_local (sym); /* Try to apply a default initialization. */
/* Determine if the symbol may not have an initializer. */