Compiling nolibc for rv32 got such errors:
In file included from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/nolibc.h:99,
from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/errno.h:26,
from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/stdio.h:14,
from tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:12:
nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:946:2: error: #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
946 | #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
| ^~~~~
nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:1062:2: error: #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
1062 | #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
If a syscall is not supported by a target platform, 'return -ENOSYS' is
better than '#error', which lets the other syscalls work as-is and
allows developers to fix up the test failures reported by nolibc-test
one by one later.
This converts all of the '#error' to 'return -ENOSYS', so, all of the
'#error' failures are fixed.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/5e7d2adf-e96f-41ca-a4c6-5c87a25d4c9c@app.fastmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
---
tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Hi Zhangjin,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 08:24:15PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Compiling nolibc for rv32 got such errors:
>
> In file included from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/nolibc.h:99,
> from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/errno.h:26,
> from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/stdio.h:14,
> from tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:12:
> nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:946:2: error: #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
> 946 | #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
> | ^~~~~
> nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:1062:2: error: #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
> 1062 | #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
>
> If a syscall is not supported by a target platform, 'return -ENOSYS' is
> better than '#error', which lets the other syscalls work as-is and
> allows developers to fix up the test failures reported by nolibc-test
> one by one later.
>
> This converts all of the '#error' to 'return -ENOSYS', so, all of the
> '#error' failures are fixed.
Yeah, I like this! Initially we wanted the ifdef to spot include file
issues (which were the major concern at the beginning), and the selftest
was very limited. But now the coverage has significantly improved, the
major concern is cross-platform support and we know we won't get all of
it at once, so -ENOSYS is far better.
Thanks for this!
Willy
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int sys_chmod(const char *path, mode_t mode)
#elif defined(__NR_chmod)
return my_syscall2(__NR_chmod, path, mode);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_fchmodat nor __NR_chmod defined, cannot implement sys_chmod()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int sys_chown(const char *path, uid_t owner, gid_t group)
#elif defined(__NR_chown)
return my_syscall3(__NR_chown, path, owner, group);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_fchownat nor __NR_chown defined, cannot implement sys_chown()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int sys_dup2(int old, int new)
#elif defined(__NR_dup2)
return my_syscall2(__NR_dup2, old, new);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_dup3 nor __NR_dup2 defined, cannot implement sys_dup2()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ pid_t sys_fork(void)
#elif defined(__NR_fork)
return my_syscall0(__NR_fork);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_clone nor __NR_fork defined, cannot implement sys_fork()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
#endif
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ int sys_link(const char *old, const char *new)
#elif defined(__NR_link)
return my_syscall2(__NR_link, old, new);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_linkat nor __NR_link defined, cannot implement sys_link()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ int sys_mkdir(const char *path, mode_t mode)
#elif defined(__NR_mkdir)
return my_syscall2(__NR_mkdir, path, mode);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_mkdirat nor __NR_mkdir defined, cannot implement sys_mkdir()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ long sys_mknod(const char *path, mode_t mode, dev_t dev)
#elif defined(__NR_mknod)
return my_syscall3(__NR_mknod, path, mode, dev);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_mknodat nor __NR_mknod defined, cannot implement sys_mknod()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ int sys_open(const char *path, int flags, mode_t mode)
#elif defined(__NR_open)
return my_syscall3(__NR_open, path, flags, mode);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_openat nor __NR_open defined, cannot implement sys_open()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ int sys_poll(struct pollfd *fds, int nfds, int timeout)
#elif defined(__NR_poll)
return my_syscall3(__NR_poll, fds, nfds, timeout);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ int sys_select(int nfds, fd_set *rfds, fd_set *wfds, fd_set *efds, struct timeva
#endif
return my_syscall5(__NR__newselect, nfds, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout);
#else
-#error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ int sys_stat(const char *path, struct stat *buf)
#elif defined(__NR_stat)
ret = my_syscall2(__NR_stat, path, &stat);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_newfstatat nor __NR_stat defined, cannot implement sys_stat()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
buf->st_dev = stat.st_dev;
buf->st_ino = stat.st_ino;
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ int sys_symlink(const char *old, const char *new)
#elif defined(__NR_symlink)
return my_syscall2(__NR_symlink, old, new);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_symlinkat nor __NR_symlink defined, cannot implement sys_symlink()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ int sys_unlink(const char *path)
#elif defined(__NR_unlink)
return my_syscall1(__NR_unlink, path);
#else
-#error Neither __NR_unlinkat nor __NR_unlink defined, cannot implement sys_unlink()
+ return -ENOSYS;
#endif
}