[v1,05/10] mm: Implement folio_remove_rmap_range()
Commit Message
Like page_remove_rmap() but batch-removes the rmap for a range of pages
belonging to a folio, for effciency savings. All pages are accounted as
small pages.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
include/linux/rmap.h | 2 ++
mm/rmap.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
Comments
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:14 AM Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Like page_remove_rmap() but batch-removes the rmap for a range of pages
> belonging to a folio, for effciency savings. All pages are accounted as
> small pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rmap.h | 2 ++
> mm/rmap.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
Sorry for nagging: this can be included in a followup series.
@@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ void folio_add_file_rmap_range(struct folio *, struct page *, unsigned int nr,
struct vm_area_struct *, bool compound);
void page_remove_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
bool compound);
+void folio_remove_rmap_range(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
+ int nr, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
void hugepage_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
unsigned long address, rmap_t flags);
@@ -1434,6 +1434,68 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
folio_add_file_rmap_range(folio, page, nr_pages, vma, compound);
}
+/*
+ * folio_remove_rmap_range - take down pte mappings from a range of pages
+ * belonging to a folio. All pages are accounted as small pages.
+ * @folio: folio that all pages belong to
+ * @page: first page in range to remove mapping from
+ * @nr: number of pages in range to remove mapping from
+ * @vma: the vm area from which the mapping is removed
+ *
+ * The caller needs to hold the pte lock.
+ */
+void folio_remove_rmap_range(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
+ int nr, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ atomic_t *mapped = &folio->_nr_pages_mapped;
+ int nr_unmapped = 0;
+ int nr_mapped;
+ bool last;
+ enum node_stat_item idx;
+
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
+
+ if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ /* Is this the page's last map to be removed? */
+ last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount);
+ nr_unmapped = last;
+ } else {
+ for (; nr != 0; nr--, page++) {
+ /* Is this the page's last map to be removed? */
+ last = atomic_add_negative(-1, &page->_mapcount);
+ if (last) {
+ /* Page still mapped if folio mapped entirely */
+ nr_mapped = atomic_dec_return_relaxed(mapped);
+ if (nr_mapped < COMPOUND_MAPPED)
+ nr_unmapped++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (nr_unmapped) {
+ idx = folio_test_anon(folio) ? NR_ANON_MAPPED : NR_FILE_MAPPED;
+ __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, idx, -nr_unmapped);
+
+ /*
+ * Queue anon THP for deferred split if we have just unmapped at
+ * least 1 page, while at least 1 page remains mapped.
+ */
+ if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_anon(folio))
+ if (nr_mapped)
+ deferred_split_folio(folio);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * It would be tidy to reset folio_test_anon mapping when fully
+ * unmapped, but that might overwrite a racing page_add_anon_rmap
+ * which increments mapcount after us but sets mapping before us:
+ * so leave the reset to free_pages_prepare, and remember that
+ * it's only reliable while mapped.
+ */
+
+ munlock_vma_folio(folio, vma, false);
+}
+
/**
* page_remove_rmap - take down pte mapping from a page
* @page: page to remove mapping from